On 5/18/2022 11:01 AM, John R Levine wrote:
but even though both are technically sound, nobody uses them outside of a
few specialized communities which suggests that it's not going to happen.
btw, neither does cert management in a way that has been shown to scale
across the open, hetero
On 5/17/2022 8:44 PM, Luis E. Muñoz wrote:
I wonder if this one
( ) Public reluctance to accept weird new forms of money
should be complemented with a crypto version, to avoid triggering those that
hate cryptos being compared with money?
Indeed. In fact it seems clear to me that this is
On 5/18/2022 11:01 AM, John R Levine wrote:
Hm, your copy of the message appears to have been cut off. Here's the
rest which you presumably missed:
I didn't.
Your opening echoed my language, in a form casting it as taking
exception to it.
I was noting that your choice for interpreting m
Note that, in spite of DMARC, we still do not have per-user
authentication.
We have at least two flavors in PGP and S/MIME,
When something exists for 30 years and has market penetration that cannot
even rise to the level of being called 'meager'. /WE/ -- it, the Internet
community -- does not
On 5/18/2022 10:32 AM, John Levine wrote:
> It appears that Dave Crocker via mailop said:
...
Note that, in spite of DMARC, we still do not have per-user
>> authentication.
We have at least two flavors in PGP and S/MIME,
When something exists for 30 years and has market penetration that
It appears that Dave Crocker via mailop said:
>
>
>On 5/17/2022 4:40 PM, Anne Mitchell via mailop wrote:
>> "why we can't do that", culminating in "the Commission concludes that, under
>> present conditions, a National Do Not Email Registry in any form would not
>> have any beneficial impact on
On 5/17/22 16:40, Anne Mitchell via mailop wrote:
For those who didn't know, you may find this infuria...interesting. Did you know that CAN-SPAM mandated that the FTC look at creating a Do Not Email list and report their findings within 6 months of CAN-SPAM being enacted?
Of course, because la
It appears that Luis E. Muñoz via mailop said:
>On 17 May 2022, at 21:59, Dave Crocker via mailop wrote:
>
>> I keep enjoying that it has the style of satire, but is so well done is it
>> /extremely/ useful for legitimate use.
>
>I wonder if this one
>
>( ) Public reluctance to accept weird new f
> On May 17, 2022, at 8:10 PM, Paul Vixie via mailop wrote:
>
> that was vernon schryver, and the list is still online, and vernon still adds
> to it from time to time. rather than post the url itself, i'll post the
> KARKIVE link from news.admin.net-abuse.email where it was first announced.
As Lyle says, AOL and Yahoo are the same entity nowadays. So you'll
want to go here - https://senders.yahooinc.com/ - click on contact,
and click on the first button (problems).
Lyle -- they are no longer Verizon Media, FYI:
https://www.spamresource.com/2021/09/yahoo-is-yahoo-again.html
Cheers,
A
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 4:04 PM sam via mailop wrote:
> I am trying to track down a contact for aol.com as we have a couple users
> who are emailing into aol.com but there mail is landing in spam
>
You can get support at https://senders.yahooinc.com
- Marcel
___
11 matches
Mail list logo
