On 2022-02-23 at 17:49 +0100, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
> Why are you looking for a webmail close to Gmail? Gmail's webmail
> interface is one of the worst possible. It is very inefficient to
> operate,
> counter-intuitive, hides many important information from the user
> etc., not mentioning
On 2/24/22 16:40, Grant Taylor via mailop wrote:
On 2/24/22 1:44 PM, Jay Hennigan via mailop wrote:
Assuming that your home connection is typical residential broadband,
consider a split system. Host your receiving SMTP at home with a
dynamic DNS tracker to keep the MX pointed at your dynamic re
On 2/24/22 1:44 PM, Jay Hennigan via mailop wrote:
Assuming that your home connection is typical residential broadband,
consider a split system. Host your receiving SMTP at home with a dynamic
DNS tracker to keep the MX pointed at your dynamic residential IP and
use this for inbound mail to you
On 2/24/22 11:36, Grant Taylor via mailop wrote:
Maybe it's silly, but my understanding is that it's more difficult to
/legally/ gain access to my email when it's hosted in my house as
opposed to hosted on a VPS / CO-LO *without* /my/ /knowledge/ of it. As
in the police can take a warrant to
Hi list,
I am in the search of a email relay service for low volume [1] of high
quality messages to be used as fallback outbound SMTP server for the
service my company provides.
Do any of you folks provide such kind of service? Please reply to be
off-list.
My servers sent emails on behalf
On 2/24/22 10:38 AM, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
I guess theres no single answer to that question that everybody will
agree upon :).
Let's agree to /disagree/. ;-)
But as for me, I would understand hosting any service X (be it email,
web or anything else) "entirely" at your home (on a ho
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 06:38:24PM +0100, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
> And in this particular case we are discussing, not only a VPS is involved,
> but also a 3rd party service that acts both as a MX for incoming mail and as
> an outgoing SMTP server that actually delivers mail to recipients.
Dnia 24.02.2022 o godz. 09:30:27 Grant Taylor via mailop pisze:
>
> What I don't know is if this qualifies as "hosting entirely
> yourself". Does the reliance on a VPS to be an L3 endpoint break
> "entirely"? Does substituting the VPS with a box that you Co-Lo
> change anything?
I guess theres n
On 2/24/22 3:42 AM, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
So you are not hosting entirely yourself. You are using a 3rd party
provider to send the mail for you.
Hosting your mail entirely on a home server (ie. using this server
directly to send and receive, without a 3rd party provider), although
t
Dnia 24.02.2022 o godz. 01:58:36 Paul Gregg via mailop pisze:
>
> So I concur with John... it is perfectly possible to host yourself if
> you can get past things like 'dialup rbls' and other poor reputation
> blocks. It's often easier just to let established providers do that
> bit.
So you are n
On Wed 23/Feb/2022 14:10:56 +0100 Sinclair, John via mailop wrote:
it’s more of a what OS/email/webmail is best of breed these days, not only for
robustness/security, but also something that can have at least some attempt at
blocking most of the spam…
For an uncommon choice, let me mention Co
11 matches
Mail list logo
