Re: [mailop] Best Re-engagement Email

2019-09-18 Thread Hal Murray via mailop
Damon said: > I have asked around and got a few opposing answers. Plain text vs. HTML, > images ok/images not-ok, Opt-out Link at top or bottom, send from > transactional IP vs. customer's 'regular' IP, CTA incentive for re-engaging > included or not. You skipped the most important part. Send ma

Re: [mailop] Best Re-engagement Email

2019-09-18 Thread Jay Hennigan via mailop
On 9/18/19 13:56, Michael Rathbun via mailop wrote: From experience, the best re-engagement email is sent to someone who has not opened or clicked within the past four months, and says, essentially, "If you want to continue to receive email from us, click here. Otherwise, you won't ever hear f

Re: [mailop] Best Re-engagement Email

2019-09-18 Thread Luke via mailop
If you're philosophically opposed to clicking links in an email, I doubt you'd be in a position to receive too many re-engagement campaigns from email marketers. Unless they are spammers then the whole point is moot. I guess you could argue that one should subscribe to a newsletter but only *read*

Re: [mailop] Best Re-engagement Email

2019-09-18 Thread ml+mailop--- via mailop
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019, Michael Rathbun via mailop wrote: > opened or clicked within the past four months, and says, essentially, "If you > want to continue to receive email from us, click here. Otherwise, you won't I hate that stuff... beside the annoyance of requiring web stuff to receive info v

Re: [mailop] Must be a lot of abuse at Microsoft these days

2019-09-18 Thread Michael Wise via mailop
Noted. People poked. Thanks for the heads-up. And no, I don't get traffic sent to that mailbox. Aloha, Michael. -- Michael J Wise Microsoft Corporation| Spam Analysis "Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed." Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool ? -Original Message- From: mailop On Behalf

[mailop] Must be a lot of abuse at Microsoft these days

2019-09-18 Thread John Levine via mailop
All my spam reports to ab...@microsoft.com are bouncing back as mailbox full. -- Regards, John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly ___ ma

Re: [mailop] Best Re-engagement Email

2019-09-18 Thread Michael Rathbun via mailop
On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 12:22:32 -0700, Damon via mailop wrote: >I have asked around and got a few opposing answers. Plain text vs. HTML, >images ok/images not-ok, Opt-out Link at top or bottom, send from >transactional IP vs. customer's 'regular' IP, CTA incentive for re-engaging >included or not. >

[mailop] Best Re-engagement Email

2019-09-18 Thread Damon via mailop
I have asked around and got a few opposing answers. Plain text vs. HTML, images ok/images not-ok, Opt-out Link at top or bottom, send from transactional IP vs. customer's 'regular' IP, CTA incentive for re-engaging included or not. Anyone have any really good examples of ubiquitous re-engagement e

Re: [mailop] Spamhaus contact

2019-09-18 Thread Brett Schenker via mailop
Yes, I'm part of that team. - Is there an abuse reporting address set up? Are reports to that address read by humans and the reports reviewed to identify policy compliance issues? I don't see an address like that registered with abuse.net, which is where I usually check to look for where to send re

Re: [mailop] Spamhaus contact

2019-09-18 Thread Al Iverson via mailop
Brett, Linkedin suggests you work for NGP VAN. I've received spam from your platform in the past and wasn't sure where to report it. Could you clarify a couple of things for the group and world? - Is there an abuse reporting address set up? Are reports to that address read by humans and the report

[mailop] Contact for Spectrum, Roadrunner, Charter Mitigation Requests

2019-09-18 Thread T R via mailop
Hi is there anyone that has a viable postmaster contact that I can connect with off-list? Thanks, Tony ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop