Re: [mailop] Outlook/Hotmail Blacklist

2019-03-12 Thread Jim Popovitch via mailop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Wed, 2019-03-06 at 16:03 -0500, Scott Mutter wrote: > Hello list > > I'm looking for any assistance in trying to get off of an Outlook/Hotmail > mailinst list with Microsoft. Received: from hawk.wznoc.com ([209.140.28.140]) envelope-from

Re: [mailop] Outlook/Hotmail Blacklist

2019-03-12 Thread Erik Figueiredo
Scott Mutter described exactly my pain. I have been sending more than a million emails daily for two years and never had any problem with Microsoft / Outlook / Hotmail. Recently I had 12 blocked IPs in a week. I submited the postmaster form twice, at the second time I got the answer: the block

Re: [mailop] Outlook/Hotmail Blacklist

2019-03-12 Thread Michael Wise via mailop
Yeah, we get that a lot about the, "Don't really see anything..." There are a number of issues with that, one of which is, being blocked isn't the whole story, as a lot can happen to the traffic from the time it passes the edge to the time it arrives at the mailbox server, and even until the

Re: [mailop] Certain addresses from G Suite going straight to O365 spam

2019-03-12 Thread Nick Stallman
Just a quick update, Michael seems to have sorted my issue out by stirring the secret sauce a little. On 12/3/19 5:04 am, Nick Stallman wrote: Nope this is 100% manual email sent to people who have specifically asked to be contacted (either via website form, phone or email). No templates, co

[mailop] cloudfilter.net/sprintpcs.com MX servers giving 250 with ESMTP server not available

2019-03-12 Thread Josiah Ritchie
All our outbound mail servers have seen strange responses to messages to sprintpcs.com, vmobl.com, sms.myboostmobile.com and message.ting.com. They are delivered to postmark's spr-sms.mx.a.cloudfilter.net MX servers and frequently given a 250 with the message "ESMTP server not available". Our postf

[mailop] Whats up with Microsoft Support?

2019-03-12 Thread Michael Ellis
I have sent support tickets twice now for a customer and they have been answered with the usual here is your ticket but theres nothing in the ticket. No we fixed it or even a screw you!! Is there an issue? ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org

Re: [mailop] Mailing list with From header munging... and Outlook

2019-03-12 Thread Jesse Thompson via mailop
On 3/11/2019 5:44 PM, Michael Wise wrote: > It does appear that it did it correctly with my first reply, … but this > reply has it just to you. Initially. So, the behavior is inconsistent for you, as well? Jesse > > A screenshot of a cell phone Description automatically generated > > Aloha,

Re: [mailop] Mailing list with From header munging... and Outlook

2019-03-12 Thread Jesse Thompson via mailop
On 3/12/2019 3:36 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > On Tue 12/Mar/2019 02:43:38 +0100 Neil Jenkins wrote: >> On Tue, 12 Mar 2019, at 09:26, Jesse Thompson via mailop wrote: >>> When someone reply-alls to a munged message it only composes a message to >>> the >>> Reply-to and the Cc, but ignores the F

Re: [mailop] Mailing list with From header munging... and Outlook

2019-03-12 Thread Jesse Thompson via mailop
On 3/12/2019 1:50 AM, Benjamin BILLON wrote: > So, the question is rather why Jesse and Michael's messages contain a > Reply-To: header, and not yours. > > (What will my contain? Surprise surprise! Using Outlook) Well, splio.com publishes p=none, so this list isn't munging it, as expected. Thi

[mailop] Shopify Contact

2019-03-12 Thread Mohammed Ahmed
Hello, Anyone from Shopify in here? If yes, please contact me off list. Need to work on some dmarc policy issue. -- Thanks, Mohammed Ahmed MarketHero ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mail

Re: [mailop] Mailing list with From header munging... and Outlook

2019-03-12 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On Tue 12/Mar/2019 02:43:38 +0100 Neil Jenkins wrote: > On Tue, 12 Mar 2019, at 09:26, Jesse Thompson via mailop wrote: >> When someone reply-alls to a munged message it only composes a message to the >> Reply-to and the Cc, but ignores the From (the list address is munged into >> the From header).