> The statement was the selectors do not have an effect on reputation, but
that sometimes people believe they do because they changed the selector at
the same time they changed other things.
@Laura> that too; but there were clearly a possibility to say "no we don't
use s= at all", it hasn't been sa
On 2017-10-10 08:20, John R Levine wrote:
On Tue, 10 Oct 2017, David Hofstee wrote:
Didn't Google mention they wanted the age of the keys to count in the
spam
score?
I'll check but I would be surprised if it made much difference.
I rotate my keys every month, which seems to be more often tha
Yeah, I'd echo a bunch of what Vladimir said, selectors are useful for
different mail streams from the same domain, and we've played with using it
for reputation (as a tuple with domain). That said, we don't want to
discourage rotation, especially not anything crazy like requiring senders
to ramp
> On Oct 10, 2017, at 9:25 AM, Vladimir Dubrovin via mailop
> wrote:
>
>
> I can say nothing about Google, but selectors can really have indirect impact
> on the reputation.
>
> We do not bind reputation directly to objects like domains, selectors, etc
> and use dynamic tuples instead (that
The *.gappssmtp.com default DKIM signatures for GSuite domains are
currently all a single key, which would seem to say that we don't currently
think that blending keys is a bad thing.
That isn't to say it can't change in the future if there becomes a need, of
course.
Brandon
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Philip Paeps wrote:
>
> Are there any published recommendations on how frequently one should
> rotate DKIM keys?
>
Yes:
https://www.m3aawg.org/documents/en/m3aawg-dkim-key-rotation-best-common-practices
There's an update coming soon but the frequency recommendat
I can say nothing about Google, but selectors can really have indirect
impact on the reputation.
We do not bind reputation directly to objects like domains, selectors,
etc and use dynamic tuples instead (that is content of this tuple is
flexible to better match specific mailing type), and in many
On 2017-10-10 10:20:36 (-0400), John R Levine wrote:
I rotate my keys every month, which seems to be more often than anyone
else in the world. and they like my mail just fine.
Are there any published recommendations on how frequently one should
rotate DKIM keys?
I've been rotating mine annua
> On Oct 9, 2017, at 8:15 PM, Benjamin BILLON via mailop
> wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> > Do you?
> In the way I tried to express it, yes.
> Gmail recently said that the selector, or the change of the selector, can
> have a role in their anti-spam and reputation system. Just because it's an
> el
outlook.com's inbound MX is sporadically rejecting messages from us
(devoted.com, sending via G Suite) with:
550 5.7.1 Service unavailable, Client host [209.85.216.174] blocked using
Customer Block list (AS16012607)
[CY1NAM02FT044.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com]
AS16012607 indica
On Tue, 10 Oct 2017, David Hofstee wrote:
Didn't Google mention they wanted the age of the keys to count in the spam
score?
I'll check but I would be surprised if it made much difference.
I rotate my keys every month, which seems to be more often than anyone
else in the world. and they like m
Didn't Google mention they wanted the age of the keys to count in the spam
score?
Old keys tend to have a longer timeframe to get stolen I guess. Maybe a
frequent key changes is an indicator of having good ops practices which
result in fewer incidents? Funny enough, I have only ever met one custom
12 matches
Mail list logo
