On 21 Jul 2017, at 17:09, Scott Bonacker wrote:
If email is to be used for legal notices, with potential penalties and
consequences for non-receipt, non-delivery, etc.,
This would be a terrible idea. There is no single responsible party
overseeing end-to-end handling of email that crosses dom
Thank you to those who made their comments, it was helpful. Msgs
started coming through today - I had contacted whomever I could at the
sender side and also made delisting requests at the other end but who
knows. Actually I thought this might be a tech article for
TechnoLawyer too so I passed it al
We used Precedence: bulk for 7 years, then we stopped using that header
since a month.
The main reason was a big B2B italian provider (Aruba) that simply dropped
email with "Precedence: bulk" when the contact was on holiday and then
kept dropping them even when the vacation was over. It took almo
Hello all,
Based on your experience, is this "Precedence" header mandatory on
campaigns sent ? I mean, for a legit sender, does it have a negative impact
in term of spam/reputation filtering ?
I know Google expect bulk senders to set it, but what on other destinations
?
For example, Sendforensic
