On 3 Nov 2013, at 7:59, mailmate-l...@seebs.net wrote:
A mail server went kerplooie.
Sorry to hear that.
And the next time I connected to the new server... Mailmate deleted
all the messages which had previously been considered to be associated
with that account, because they were no longer
On 3 Nov 2013, at 19:59, mailmate-l...@seebs.net wrote:
I think I've run into this before, with the notion that IMAP's goal is
synchronization. But I don't want synchronization; I want to download
mail and then keep it forever. I absolutely, positively, under NO
CIRCUMSTANCES WHATSOEVER, want
On 3 Nov 2013, at 2:21, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
And the next time I connected to the new server... Mailmate deleted
all the messages which had previously been considered to be
associated with that account, because they were no longer present on
the server.
Er. That is exactly the opposite
On 3 Nov 2013, at 3:29, Alasdair Muckart wrote:
If you want fetch-and-store rather than server-stored you want
something like POP rather than IMAP. Fetchmail to a local store you
access using IMAP and MailMate would act the way you sound like you
need and could be backed up locally.
That's b
On 3 Nov 2013, at 10:37, Seebs wrote:
On 3 Nov 2013, at 2:21, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
I understand that, but as you write yourself then this is how IMAP is
supposed to work.
Is it, though?
I was under the impression there were supposed to be some sanity
checks to avoid catastrophic data
On 3 Nov 2013, at 4:03, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
I hope everything goes well.
For reference: Mailmate crashed once about 60k messages into the
restore, but it appears to have been fairly clean, and the restore is
continuing peacefully. So, the local cache is now repopulated, it's just
gott
On 2 Nov 2013, at 15:05, Scott Blystone wrote:
[...]
You are certainly as an advanced user as one can be with respect to
S/MIME.
Ideally, I would like to see MailMate have a combo box for both
S/MIME and OpenPGP whereby the sender could select any certificate
desired. While one might thi
On 3 Nov 2013, at 5:26, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
...
Ok, I can see that it's not enough to be able to bind a sender address
to a specific key/certificate as it is currently possible when using
[OpenPGP](http://manual.mailmate-app.com/hidden_preferences#openpgp).
Maybe I should allow multiple
>> If there are any 5by5 jackals in the room, you know Dan Benjamin does
>> a mean ad read. Get one of the alpha nerds hooked on MailMate and they
>> will sing its praises until everyone HAS to buy it.
I'd go for Brett Terpstra. He's a Markdown fanatic and loves low level
tweaking. I think Mail
On 3 Nov 2013, at 14:12, Scott Blystone wrote:
Well, just to throw more gasoline on the fire, I also have multiple
OpenPGP keys for the same identities and have been even more involved
with that community! I know it's asking a lot, but something similar
to what we've been discussing would also
On 3 Nov 2013, at 10:15, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
...
And how do they do it?
The best way of describing this was to show you some screenshots. I've
put them in my public Dropbox folder, and here are the links:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3102272/SMIME%20Selection.tiff
https://dl.d
On 3 Nov 2013, at 9:10, Bruce Steinberg wrote:
If there are any 5by5 jackals in the room, you know Dan Benjamin
does
a mean ad read. Get one of the alpha nerds hooked on MailMate and
they
will sing its praises until everyone HAS to buy it.
I'd go for Brett Terpstra. He's a Markdown fanatic a
12 matches
Mail list logo
