On 14 Jun 2018, at 17:29 (-0400), Randall Meadows wrote:
(they claim that lots of messages in INBOX slows things down)
That is not implausible. In fact, it makes a lot of sense.
INBOX sees a lot of random-ish single-message churn, making it ideal for
a file-per-message/directory-per-mailbox
On 14 Jun 2018, at 16:25 (-0400), Peter Borsella wrote:
Hello, All,
I currently have hundreds of IMAP folders. Now that I have MailMate
I’m wondering, is it better to create IMAP folders, or, better to
create smart mailboxes every time I need a new collection of emails?
It depends... on so
On 14 Jun 2018, at 14:25, Peter Borsella wrote:
I currently have hundreds of IMAP folders. Now that I have MailMate
I’m wondering, is it better to create IMAP folders, or, better to
create smart mailboxes every time I need a new collection of emails?
I don't know if it's endemic to IMAP, or
Hi Peter
Assuming you have (or can articulate) consistent rules about what goes
into which folder, smart mailboxes are (in my view) much better, because
I don’t much care for spending time filing. I only have these actual
mailboxes:
- inbox
- sent items
- junk (via spamsieve)
- archive
- sa
Hello, All,
I currently have hundreds of IMAP folders. Now that I have MailMate
I’m wondering, is it better to create IMAP folders, or, better to
create smart mailboxes every time I need a new collection of emails?
If this has already been debated I’d appreciate pointing me to the
discussio
