Re: Airport Time-capsule

Hi, Overall, it should be just fine for whatever people wish to do. Sure, you can have 10 GB performance with newer, more modern routers, but the bottleneck is your Internet connection. The fastest residential Internet connections, for the most part, is 1 GB or less. The Airport Extreme and

Re: Airport Time-capsule

Hi! Depends on who you’re asking. I think its ok for my purpose but its no longer made. /A > 26 okt. 2019 kl. 03:56 skrev Dave Carlson : > > So, is the AirPort Extreme also a dinosaur? > > Dave Carlson > Pioneer, Farfar, Oregonian, Woodworker, Engineer, and Musician > > > > > > -- > The fo

RE: Airport Time-capsule

' via MacVisionaries Subject: Re: Airport Time-capsule Okay Simon. Still have the Airport Extreme and a 2 Tb Lacie drive attached for Time Machine backups. Satisfied for no, unless a newer router from Brand X-Y-Z is so good as to tempt me away. Dave Carlson Musician, Engineer, Farfar, Oregonian, Woodw

RE: Airport Time-capsule

4:32 PM To: 'Tim Kilburn' via MacVisionaries Subject: Re: Airport Time-capsule Cool. I see several Netgear models ranging from $99 to $599. Speeds ranging from 1.8 Gb to 10.2 Gb. Nothing more in our home than a smart TV and three computers, two iPhones, and an iPad, plus a Wireless

Re: Airport Time-capsule

If you’re happy with what you have then there’s probably no reason to change. My Rooter is 4 years old now and since I bought it my network has expanded at a rapid rate to the point where you notice the Rooter struggling to manage and process data from coming in all directions. > On 26 Oct 2019

Re: Airport Time-capsule

, cost me $199 for a 4TB unit. Whilst these drives aren’t Rooters they do far more and are exactly what the Time Capsule should have been, a Time Capsule backup, a media streamer, a local Cloud drive, completely programmable with SHHH etc. > On 26 Oct 2019, at 1:38 pm, Simon A Fogarty wr

Re: Airport Time-capsule

Cool. I see several Netgear models ranging from $99 to $599. Speeds ranging from 1.8 Gb to 10.2 Gb. Nothing more in our home than a smart TV and three computers, two iPhones, and an iPad, plus a Wireless irrigation controller. So far our AirPort Extreme seems to be handling the traffic just fine

Re: Airport Time-capsule

Yes, the old Time Capsule would work but it would slow down my Network considerably compared to what I’m using now. Actually one could say those Time Capsules were made to withstand the test of time, very good construction, very good quality hard drive etc. > On 26 Oct 2019, at 1:44 pm, Si

Re: Airport Time-capsule

Okay well firstly security, you want to get a Rooter that is of recent production as it has firmware to stop hackers getting into your systems, computers, backups or whatever else is on your network. Modern-Day rooters can handle a larger amount of traffic than the Time Capsule, AirPort Extreme

Re: Airport Time-capsule

Okay Simon. Still have the Airport Extreme and a 2 Tb Lacie drive attached for Time Machine backups. Satisfied for no, unless a newer router from Brand X-Y-Z is so good as to tempt me away. Dave Carlson Musician, Engineer, Farfar, Oregonian, Woodworker, and Pioneer -- The following informa

RE: Airport Time-capsule

@googlegroups.com On Behalf Of Dave Carlson Sent: Saturday, 26 October 2019 3:06 PM To: 'Tim Kilburn' via MacVisionaries Subject: Re: Airport Time-capsule That’s amazing. What is/are the latest, and why so much better than an Apple AirPort Extreme? Dave Carlson Engineer, Pione

RE: Airport Time-capsule

airport express and streme should work fine as access points but they aren’t what I’d use for connecting to the internet From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com On Behalf Of Dave Carlson Sent: Saturday, 26 October 2019 2:57 PM To: 'Tim Kilburn' via MacVisionaries Subject: Re: Ai

RE: Airport Time-capsule

But is that a reason to say it wont work as a back up drive any longer? -Original Message- From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan Sent: Saturday, 26 October 2019 10:27 AM To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Airport Time-capsule Hi, The Airport

Re: Airport Time-capsule

That’s amazing. What is/are the latest, and why so much better than an Apple AirPort Extreme? Dave Carlson Engineer, Pioneer, Farfar, Woodworker, Musician, and Oregonian -- The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries list. If you have any questions or conc

Re: Airport Time-capsule

Compared to modern-day rooters yes. > On 26 Oct 2019, at 12:56 pm, Dave Carlson wrote: > > So, is the AirPort Extreme also a dinosaur? > > Dave Carlson > Pioneer, Farfar, Oregonian, Woodworker, Engineer, and Musician > > > > > > -- > The following information is important for all members

Re: Airport Time-capsule

So, is the AirPort Extreme also a dinosaur? Dave Carlson Pioneer, Farfar, Oregonian, Woodworker, Engineer, and Musician -- The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries list. If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you fee

Re: Airport Time-capsule

Hi, The Airport Time Capsule has come and gone in the scheme of things here for a variety of reasons. The device used to be my main rooter however technology has passed it by and the rooter I’m now using is far more efficient when it comes to handling Network traffic, far more secure etc. My

Airport Time-capsule

Hello, I just got my Airport Time Capsule out of storage. Thinking about setting it up again. Is it still worth using? What are the most recent updates? Thanks. -- The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries list. If you have any questions or concerns about

Re: Time capsule randomly reinitializing MacBook air Data running sierra

ine completed a verification of your backups on “Phil's AirPort Time > Capsule”. To improve reliability, Time Machine must create a new backup for > you. > Click Start New Backup to create a new backup. This will remove your existing > backup history. This could take several hours

Time capsule randomly reinitializing MacBook air Data running sierra

Two or three times since installing sierra I received the following time machine notification. Time Machine completed a verification of your backups on “Phil's AirPort Time Capsule”. To improve reliability, Time Machine must create a new backup for you. Click Start New Backup to create

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

Thanks, Scott. It's quite clear to me that you know a lot more about the who's who at this level than I do. I defer to you on this. I've just learned a lot, and I thank you for that. Seems to me if companies like Akamai, who I understand makes a business of media delivery, are happy with, and per

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

Well, first, I had actually built one of the first privately held rings so I was bringing in circuits of all sizes. I had a DS3 run in to my mother’s house at one point where I started my first ISP and then we moved we went to an OC12 then OC48 configuration with channel cards breaking out all

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

Ah, T3. How I used to drool over those speeds--beyond the range of the possible, and why would you ever need that much as a single user? And, here today's it's barely qualifying as broadband speed! I hear you about open peering, but would you want your Netflicks stream to come across that way? Af

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

I’ll tell you what I remember about UUNet, $40,000 monthly for a DS3.:). Seems like another life time ago. Another thing I remember vividly about UUNet was when they went from an open peering network to very closed and depeered with everyone, including me.:). Then again I was always an open pee

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

Ah, WorldCom. How well I remember the days of dialup around the planet with my local access number for uu.net! I had to place an international call for tech support on my first trip to Japan. I'd not previously encountered stutter tone as dialtone, and I couldn't remember the Hayes command to igno

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

Well, I am in Northern Virginia about 3 blocks away from where UUNET HQ was in the 1990's. They eventually moved out west of Dulles Airport in 1999 / 2000 after being bought by WorldCom. Why do I mention UUNET? Because Verizon bought WorldCom for pennies on the dollar after fraudulent accountin

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

Hi, Scott: Wow! Believe it or not, I remember that Verizon IPv6 page. It gave me hope while I still had FiOS at my last address over 5 years ago! As I recall, they were testing dual stack with Verizon employees in Northern Virginia. What seems to be missing, and I went and looked, is anykind of t

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

Hi Janina, here is a page detailing IPV6 on VZ. This looks somewhat out of date but it’s the only thing I could find that’s officially from VZ. https://www.verizon.com/support/consumer/consumer-education/ipv6 Also found a publi

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

Well, it saddens me to agree that Comcast service bites the big one. If my issue is simple and straight forward, I can usually get good service, but anything slightly above Level One support is bound to take time and persistance. Scott Granados writes: > You know what bugged me worse than the net

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

This is good to know, Scott. I'm glad they're finally rolling IPv6 on FiOS. Do you know if they have a page documenting their rollout? For the record Ipv6 is long since rolled out on T-Mobile across the U.S., predating their rollout of LTE. Their prefix is 2607:fb90 ... On some phones, you may nee

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

You know what bugged me worse than the network performance, the lower quality television and the instability in my area of Comcast was the customer service. By far the absolute worst I have run in to. Made me wish for the days of AT&T, that should tell you something. I have the reverse issue

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

FYI FIOS is rolling out V6 now. It’s not in my area yet but it is under way. There’s also talk of which routers you need to support it, luckily mine is one of the models that does. Like you I used a tunnel breaker before, in my case I worked with Hurricane electric but there are many option

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

I should have read the rest of this thread before posting the below. Oh, I still feel this way, but all ya'all are also talking about wired cable telivision, and I didn't pay for that when I hadmy FiOS. I went straight from my ONT to my in home Linux server over cat6 cabling. Verizon tried to coll

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

Hi, Mary: I used to drool over FiOS, then I got it and I was sort of happy. However,s hortly thereafter I was forced to move, and I ended up moving where FiO was unavailable. So, I settled for Comcast, i.e. Xfinity. Now, I'll not go back to FiOS even if I could for one simple reason. Xfinity give

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

Hi, Scott: Two answers to your question about throughput on Linksys. First, my personal experience is with the WRT1900AC, first rev. It was easily the fastest I'd ever worked with. I say this in the past tense, because I blew it up and it no longer boots. I'm just not good with tasks like crackin

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

True, with regard to Comcast and the talking menus. However, the prices are out rages, unacceptably so. They take advantage of their monopoly position in markets where they have that. Notice the difference between Comcast pricing where there is competition and where there isn't. I live in an are

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

They have that’s true and Comcast does have the talking menus but on the down side, you’re on the Comcast network. The HD performance is shameful and over compressed, the DVR is not nearly as feature packed and you do not have equivalent upload and download speeds. You’re also on some shared f

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

On the down side they still have not enabled the required talking menus like Comcast. ComCast has certainly supported the disabled and the veterans, Best wishes, Jonathan > On Nov 24, 2016, at 7:21 PM, Scott Granados wrote: > > It’s really fantastic other than they don’t su

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

You East Coast guys get the good stuff. Out here in the wilds of Oregon, we get well I won't say it because this is a family list. Mary Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 24, 2016, at 4:21 PM, Scott Granados wrote: > > It’s really fantastic other than they don’t support IPV6 yet in my area. > Oth

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

It’s really fantastic other than they don’t support IPV6 yet in my area. Otherwise it’s the best home service I’ve ever had. With the quantum service you get up to 500 megabits (last I look it might even be more), you can record up to 12 shows at a time and have hundreds of hours of record tim

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

I am jealous of you people with Fios. Mary Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 24, 2016, at 3:24 PM, Scott Granados wrote: > > I’ve never been able to push more than 18 megabits through any of the WRT > routers I’ve tried but honestly I jumped off their band wagon once Cisco > bought them. This is

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

I have not gotten it to work but I plan on spending more time on this tomorrow. I am trying to connect an AirPort Extreme to an actiontech but so far no joy. It’s very likely the guy on this side of the keyboard though so far. Will update as I continue experimenting. > On Nov 24, 2016, at

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

I’ve never been able to push more than 18 megabits through any of the WRT routers I’ve tried but honestly I jumped off their band wagon once Cisco bought them. This is a huge issue in Cisco gear and has been for their entire life. They are known for not providing wire speed solutions. I would

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

Hi! I think you can but i am not sure. My Airport extreme is the newer one with ac support and i’ll definitly keep it as long as it lives. /A > 23 nov. 2016 kl. 04:30 skrev Mary Otten : > > OK, Scott. I await your results with interest. > Mary > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Nov 22, 2016, at

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

Hi Scott, I have used four or five models of WRT family for about 10 years, recommended them nearly wholesale to customers, and never experienced any issue where trafic on forwarded ports would be comparatively slower than trafic taking place on a direct connection with no router at all. Th

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

Scott, I'd be interested in your results as well. I've connected Airport Expresses via ethernet to other networks and the Airplay feature remains as easy as ever. I don't have any non-Apple Home routers though to test with to see if WDS or whatever the newest connection method is, will work.

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

Hi Janina, I thought like most Cisco products the links’s devices had poor forwarding rates. In other words, they only forward at a third to a half of the line rate. Has this changed in more recent years or does WRT also help to address this with better more optimized software? Thanks Scott

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

It's a couple years old now, but I regard the Linksys WRT1900AC as still a top choice, but not for its native software because It's not all that accessible. This router runs OpenWRT brilliantly, and OpenWRT is fully accessible. http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/linksys/wrt_ac_series PS: I have no pers

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

happen before my Time Capsule runs to slow. Here is video 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xP61HmcVBJQ Take care > 23. nov. 2016 kl. 04.30 skrev Mary Otten : > > OK, Scott. I await your results with interest. > Mary > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Nov 22, 2016,

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

OK, Scott. I await your results with interest. Mary Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 22, 2016, at 7:06 PM, Scott Granados wrote: > > Mary, this is a very good question. I have not tried this, I will set this > up in my lab over the weekend and see what I can come up with in case nobody > else r

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

Mary, this is a very good question. I have not tried this, I will set this up in my lab over the weekend and see what I can come up with in case nobody else responds in the mean time. I would suspect it’s possible and quite easy but not having done it I want to try before I confirm. > On Nov

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

OK, I am curious. I have an airport extreme which is working fine, and I have to airport expresses connected to stereos because I have airplay and I love it. I know the AirPort Extreme is old, it doesn't even have AC, much less the one that comes after that. So here's the question. Where I could

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

Kawal, I have been using this router for several months. If cost is a factor, this might be of interest. From E.T.'s Keyboard... Without H2O there is no life! ancient.ali...@icloud.com On 11/22/2016

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

Here is the one Scott recommends. Says you get good range, and it is very secure. On reading upon it, it also has a lot of forwarding features, and parental controls for those with kids. https://www.amazon.com/NETGEAR-Nighthawk-X10-802-11ac-Quad-Stream/dp/B01M12RE4A/ref=cm_cd_al_qh_dp_t

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

I like my Airport Extreme so if it breaks down I'm not sure what I'm going to do. So I too will want to know a good reliable router if this breaks down. > On 22 Nov 2016, at 09:26, Krister Ekstrom wrote: > > Uh oh, so what’s a good and accessible wireless router in case my old trusty > Airport

Re: RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

Uh oh, so what’s a good and accessible wireless router in case my old trusty Airport Extreme breaks down on me? /Krister > 21 nov. 2016 kl. 23:52 skrev Dan D. : > > > > http://www.macworld.com/article/3143604/hardware/rip-airport-apple-may-abandon-wireless-routers-and-time-capsule.html#tk.rss_

RIP AirPort? Apple may abandon wireless routers and Time Capsule

http://www.macworld.com/article/3143604/hardware/rip-airport-apple-may-abandon-wireless-routers-and-time-capsule.html#tk.rss_all XB -- The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries list. If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or

Re: Networking and Time Capsule

irport Utility for each TC but the router info is found >>> under the Internet tab. >>> >>> Hope things get worked out quick for you. >>> >>> Later... >>> >>> Tim Kilburn >>> Fort McMurray, AB Canada >>> >>> O

Re: Networking and Time Capsule

for you. >> >> Later... >> >> Tim Kilburn >> Fort McMurray, AB Canada >> >> On Sep 21, 2016, at 18:25, Jeff Berwick > <mailto:mailingli...@berwick.name>> wrote: >> >> So far, no joy! >> >> I made the changes, but my ne

Re: Networking and Time Capsule

> So far, no joy! > > I made the changes, but my network has completely crapped out on me. As a > result, I’ve undone everything I did, but things are still not working. > > It seems that computers connected to the hub which is connected to the 1st > Time Capsule are self-assi

Re: Networking and Time Capsule

y, AB Canada > > On Sep 21, 2016, at 18:25, Jeff Berwick <mailto:mailingli...@berwick.name>> wrote: > > So far, no joy! > > I made the changes, but my network has completely crapped out on me. As a > result, I’ve undone everything I did, but things are still not

Re: Networking and Time Capsule

r, no joy! > > I made the changes, but my network has completely crapped out on me. As a > result, I’ve undone everything I did, but things are still not working. > > It seems that computers connected to the hub which is connected to the 1st > Time Capsule are self-assigning ip ad

Re: Networking and Time Capsule

a result, I’ve undone everything I did, but things are still not working. It seems that computers connected to the hub which is connected to the 1st Time Capsule are self-assigning ip addresses. One is a Windows machine and one is a MacBook Pro. I can’t figure out how to convince them to get

Re: Networking and Time Capsule

Berwick wrote: So far, no joy! I made the changes, but my network has completely crapped out on me. As a result, I’ve undone everything I did, but things are still not working. It seems that computers connected to the hub which is connected to the 1st Time Capsule are self-assigning ip addre

Re: Networking and Time Capsule

So far, no joy! I made the changes, but my network has completely crapped out on me. As a result, I’ve undone everything I did, but things are still not working. It seems that computers connected to the hub which is connected to the 1st Time Capsule are self-assigning ip addresses. One is a

Re: Networking and Time Capsule

works? Just wondering if devices on each will >> be able to see each other. >> >> Thx, >> Jeff >> >>> On Sep 21, 2016, at 2:54 PM, Scott Granados >> <mailto:sc...@qualityip.net>> wrote: >>> >>> Here’s how i would address this

Re: Networking and Time Capsule

.net>> wrote: >>> >>> Here’s how i would address this issue, Tim and John and anyone else please >>> input your ideas. >>> >>> 1. I would take the first time capsule out of router mode and put also in >>> to bridge mode. >>> 2.

Re: Networking and Time Capsule

c...@qualityip.net>> wrote: >> >> Here’s how i would address this issue, Tim and John and anyone else please >> input your ideas. >> >> 1. I would take the first time capsule out of router mode and put also in to >> bridge mode. >> 2. I would wire

Re: Networking and Time Capsule

<mailto:sc...@qualityip.net>> wrote: >> >> Here’s how i would address this issue, Tim and John and anyone else please >> input your ideas. >> >> 1. I would take the first time capsule out of router mode and put also in to >> bridge mode. >> 2.

Re: Networking and Time Capsule

orks? Just wondering if devices on each will > be able to see each other. > > Thx, > Jeff > >> On Sep 21, 2016, at 2:54 PM, Scott Granados > <mailto:sc...@qualityip.net>> wrote: >> >> Here’s how i would address this issue, Tim and John and anyone els

Re: Networking and Time Capsule

at 2:54 PM, Scott Granados <mailto:sc...@qualityip.net>> wrote: > > Here’s how i would address this issue, Tim and John and anyone else please > input your ideas. > > 1. I would take the first time capsule out of router mode and put also in to > bridge mode. >

Re: Networking and Time Capsule

h the same SSID, Security and Password in the Wireless tab of AU. Later... Tim Kilburn Fort McMurray, AB Canada On Sep 21, 2016, at 12:54, Scott Granados wrote: Here’s how i would address this issue, Tim and John and anyone else please input your ideas. 1. I would take the first time capsule o

Re: Networking and Time Capsule

, Tim and John and anyone else please > input your ideas. > > 1. I would take the first time capsule out of router mode and put also in to > bridge mode. > 2. I would wire your first time capsule right to your cable modem. > 3. I would take the second time capsule and also wire

Re: Networking and Time Capsule

Here’s how i would address this issue, Tim and John and anyone else please input your ideas. 1. I would take the first time capsule out of router mode and put also in to bridge mode. 2. I would wire your first time capsule right to your cable modem. 3. I would take the second time capsule and

Re: Networking and Time Capsule

The 1st Time Capsule is: ip: 192.168.2.10 and lan 10.0.2.1 The 2nd Time Capsule is: IP: 10.0.2.4 and LAN: same (10.0.2.4) Jeff > On Sep 21, 2016, at 2:45 PM, Scott Granados wrote: > > Bam, Tim scores! > > Your cable modem is in NAT mode hence the double NAT. SO your cable

Re: Networking and Time Capsule

Bam, Tim scores! Your cable modem is in NAT mode hence the double NAT. SO your cable modem is NAT translating the packets from a real IP on the outside to an inside IP from the 192 space. What IP is on the other inside time capsule if you don’t mind? > On Sep 21, 2016, at 2:42 PM, J

Re: Networking and Time Capsule

gt;> wrote: > > Well, you’re losing me a bit, but this is the setup: > > Cable modem connects to first time Capsule via ethernet, > 1st Time Capsule connects to hub via ethernet, > Hub connects to 2nd Time Capsule via ethernet. > > So, there is only one ethernet conne

Re: Networking and Time Capsule

to. Later... Tim Kilburn Fort McMurray, AB Canada On Sep 21, 2016, at 12:29, Jeff Berwick wrote: Well, you’re losing me a bit, but this is the setup: Cable modem connects to first time Capsule via ethernet, 1st Time Capsule connects to hub via ethernet, Hub connects to 2nd Time Capsule via eth

Re: Networking and Time Capsule

Well, you’re losing me a bit, but this is the setup: Cable modem connects to first time Capsule via ethernet, 1st Time Capsule connects to hub via ethernet, Hub connects to 2nd Time Capsule via ethernet. So, there is only one ethernet connection to the modem, but it also connects to my Fibe TV

Re: Networking and Time Capsule

John, I think you’re on to something here. Let me make sure I have the wiring correct. Jeff starts out with a cable modem which I think John is right is probably locked to one IP and probably also bound by Mac address. >From the cable modem we have a cable attaching to an airport time caps

Re: Networking and Time Capsule

I have a modem supplied by them which is > the first touch point in the house. The ethernet cables then connect to a > Time Capsule set to DHCP and NET, more ethernet cables through a hub and then > to another Time Capsule set to Bridge mode. > > When I look at the status tabl

Re: Networking and Time Capsule

Hi there, Unfortunately, I know just enough about this stuff to get my network somewhat working and be a little dangerous. I use Bell services in Canada and I have a modem supplied by them which is the first touch point in the house. The ethernet cables then connect to a Time Capsule set to

Re: Networking and Time Capsule

, you may be able to determine the issue. So, in AU, access the Time Capsule, then interact with the Scroll area, there should be a Status table there that should note the issue. I expect that it is likely a double NAT issue which Scott's suggestion will fix. Later... Tim Kilburn Fort McM

Re: Networking and Time Capsule

BY time capsule I assume you mean airport router? Here’s how it should be set up, you should have your ISP router as the head end as you do now. Next, you should set the airports in to bridging mode or as access points so you’re not using them to route. Set the addresses assignment to dhcp

Networking and Time Capsule

the way to the ISP’s modem, but can’t get anything outside my home through ping or on the internet. If I move closer to my older Time Capsule, everything is fine; however, if I am using my newer Time Capsule, this is when I get the problems. So, I am pretty sure it is something with my newer

Re: Time Capsule on a u-verse router

was due to an ice storm. I get 24MB download and 3MB upload. Works great. > Sarai D. Bucciarelli www.linkedin.com/in/SaraiDBucciarelli > >> On Feb 25, 2015, at 5:02 PM, Joseph wrote: >> >> Hello list, >> Is anyone using a time capsule on u-verse with success? &g

Re: Time Capsule on a u-verse router

t; Is anyone using a time capsule on u-verse with success? > Here’s the deal. We for a number of reasons are thinking about switching from > cable to u-verse. > I am currently using my 802 11 AC duel band airport time capsule on the > docsis 3 cable modem just fine. Except when the

Re: Time Capsule on a u-verse router

I didn’t have to change my Uverse router, nor configure it. Sarai D. Bucciarelli www.linkedin.com/in/SaraiDBucciarelli > On Feb 27, 2015, at 7:59 AM, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote: > > Yeah, granted that you can work around it to get BTMM working, but it’s an > awful hack, and I’d really rather t

Re: Time Capsule on a u-verse router

Yeah, granted that you can work around it to get BTMM working, but it’s an awful hack, and I’d really rather the AirPort does the routing anyway, because it’s just a truckload better at it. It is one thing that cable puts a shine on, because cable modems built to spec are generally trivial to p

Re: Time Capsule on a u-verse router

Hello, Here’s the thing. For what we pay for cable we should be getting much better service, in my opinion. In regards to over the phone techs, I agree. But we’ve also had repair technicians come to the door both back when we had DSL several years ago and also with Comcast support. The problem i

Re: Time Capsule on a u-verse router

Att is going to be more consistent. they have a better network than any cable company. However, cable has faster speeds at the moment, but it’s mostly burst speeds. I think there is much greater potential from the telecom offerings, but their rollout of new stuff is still a bit rocky at the m

Re: Time Capsule on a u-verse router

Well, I don’t see it as surrender exactly, rather as picking my battles. You actually don’t have to bridge any of the residential gateways to use back to my mac, but you do have to do some tweaking. I’ve seen a couple of methods, one of which is at https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3865704.

Re: Time Capsule on a u-verse router

Hello guys, This is getting really interesting. And I appreciate all that is being said here. I did listen to the Video. Now I’ll look at the other info. What this all hedges on is if Comcast is interested in making it’s service more consistent or not. I won’t even go into Comcast customer servic

Re: Time Capsule on a u-verse router

Hello, Thanks. Thats also a good point, because I do want back to my mac enabled. > On Feb 26, 2015, at 4:07 AM, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote: > > I prefer running the AirPort directly facing the Internet, for that way the > guest network and Back To My Mac features are available. > > U-Verse is

Re: Time Capsule on a u-verse router

I prefer running the AirPort directly facing the Internet, for that way the guest network and Back To My Mac features are available. U-Verse is often just (V)DSL. It might be worthwhile your investing in a modem that does the bridging, such as Draytek 120/130. Or, see if you can get your mode

Re: Time Capsule on a u-verse router

erches the equipment from them when you sign up. Uverse DSL is IP DSL and >> the modulation is either ADSL2+ or VDSL2+. If you are able to get Uverse >> tv, than it will be the latter. >> >> On Feb 25, 2015, at 5:02 PM, Joseph wrote: >> >> Hello list, >&

Re: Time Capsule on a u-verse router

u are able to get Uverse tv, > than it will be the latter. > > On Feb 25, 2015, at 5:02 PM, Joseph wrote: > > Hello list, > Is anyone using a time capsule on u-verse with success? > Here’s the deal. We for a number of reasons are thinking about switching from > cable t

Re: Time Capsule on a u-verse router

ither ADSL2+ or VDSL2+. If you are able to get Uverse tv, > than it will be the latter. > > On Feb 25, 2015, at 5:02 PM, Joseph wrote: > > Hello list, > Is anyone using a time capsule on u-verse with success? > Here’s the deal. We for a number of reasons are thinking

Re: Time Capsule on a u-verse router

from them when you sign up. Uverse DSL is IP DSL and the modulation is either ADSL2+ or VDSL2+. If you are able to get Uverse tv, than it will be the latter. On Feb 25, 2015, at 5:02 PM, Joseph wrote: Hello list, Is anyone using a time capsule on u-verse with success? Here’s the deal. We for

Time Capsule on a u-verse router

Hello list, Is anyone using a time capsule on u-verse with success? Here’s the deal. We for a number of reasons are thinking about switching from cable to u-verse. I am currently using my 802 11 AC duel band airport time capsule on the docsis 3 cable modem just fine. Except when the cable

  1   2   3   >