agreed that joke of a security company along with norton are absolutely useless
unless you want to trash your winblows crap box.
On Dec 28, 2010, at 7:58 PM, Scott Granados wrote:
> This is BS.
>
>
> Macafee has about as much clue and product quality as the burnouts they hire
> in radio shack
I absolutely agree.
My thought is exploits will happen via services that people enable with out the
appropriate clue just like you see in the Unix world today. Someone with an
improperly patched httpd or BIND, that sort of thing.
Nice to see someone with common interests. I feel like I need b
Yep, i completely agree with all your points, but...
All the arguments you pointed out are the ones i myself point out when
discussing security with PC owners. The unix base, BSD, posix permissions which
are better laid out than windows ACLs, the fact that windows was not initially
made for int
This is BS.
Macafee has about as much clue and product quality as the burnouts they hire in
radio shack.
Apple has a Unix underpinning which means if set up correctly virus code won't
propegate. Windows is much easier because permissions aren't handled correctly
among other massive security
Hi list,
Please have a look at this article :
http://www.macworld.com/article/156738/2010/12/apple_bigger_security_target_in_2011.html?lsrc=rss_main
This is just to put it into people's minds that there is an end to everything,
but better early than too late
--
You received this message
