Hi!
Oh, didn’t realize that.
They haven’t included the swedish voices yet.
Hope they will.
/A
> 17 jun 2015 kl. 08:50 skrev Shawn Krasniuk :
>
> You guys realize that Nuance bought Loquendo right? Therefore, we already
> have Loquendo voices on here. They are Alison, Kate and Susan.
>
> Shawn
>
You guys realize that Nuance bought Loquendo right? Therefore, we already have
Loquendo voices on here. They are Alison, Kate and Susan.
Shawn
Sent from my White MacBook
> On Jun 16, 2015, at 6:30 AM, Jessica Moss wrote:
>
> I'd love to have the loquendo voices too, even for the iPhone.
>
>
Hi!
Actually Loquendo is available for mac developpers but no one has integrated
it into voiceover.
The same with espeak.
/A
> 16 jun 2015 kl. 20:23 skrev Devin Prater :
>
> I do think eSpeak would be a good investment for Apple. They do, after all,
> use other open source products or libraries
I do think eSpeak would be a good investment for Apple. They do, after all, use
other open source products or libraries don't they?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 11, 2015, at 8:51 AM, Anders Holmberg wrote:
>
> Hi!
> As Jonathan mentioned a voice may not be prefered by someone but others may
>
I'd love to have the loquendo voices too, even for the iPhone.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 11, 2015, at 9:51 AM, Anders Holmberg wrote:
>
> Hi!
> As Jonathan mentioned a voice may not be prefered by someone but others may
> like it.
> I would like for example to have espeak for mac intergrate
About Espeak, yeah, especially now Swift will be open source. Just saying in
case one wishes to compile Espeak in this language.
> On 11 Jun 2015, at 14:51, Anders Holmberg wrote:
>
> Hi!
> As Jonathan mentioned a voice may not be prefered by someone but others may
> like it.
> I would like for
Hi!
As Jonathan mentioned a voice may not be prefered by someone but others may
like it.
I would like for example to have espeak for mac intergrated into voiceover.
Or the loquendo voices which are really great.
This is something i have been telling apple but it might be good to remind
them.
/A
gt;
>>>> I know there is a port for Eloquence done by Tylor Spivy of Eloquence that
>>>> works on the mac, but it's a bit tricky to get it working, and is
>>>> incredibly incredibly unstable. I used it just long enough to see if it
>>>> real
t; really actually worked, but obviously took it off, 1, when I saw how
>>> unstable it was, and 2, due to the fact it's also illegal. Even had it
>>> worked flawlessly, I couldn't have kept it in good concience.
>>>
>>> I agree though, if there was
bly can listen to on and on for hours at a time.
Chris.
- Original Message - From: "'Kevin Cussick' via MacVisionaries"
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 2:17 PM
Subject: Re: time for Apple to get a new default voice
Well I use Fiona Compact and have it as fast as I ca
There is enough documentation for a new TTS to be written. It’s sparse, but it
is there. It’s simply a question of who will write the speech manager plug-in.
FMM, I appreciate that Apple and followers are opposed to anything retro, but I
think there’s both enough evidence and enough interest t
gt;> really actually worked, but obviously took it off, 1, when I saw how
>>> unstable it was, and 2, due to the fact it's also illegal. Even had it
>>> worked flawlessly, I couldn't have kept it in good concience.
>>>
>>> I agree though, if there wa
it off, 1, when I saw how
>>> unstable it was, and 2, due to the fact it's also illegal. Even had it
>>> worked flawlessly, I couldn't have kept it in good concience.
>>>
>>> I agree though, if there was a way to buy a mac ported stable mind you,
&g
I'd do it faster than a blink of an eye!
>> Darn straight I would! It's really about the only synth I can not only
>> understand, but comfortably can listen to on and on for hours at a time.
>>
>> Chris.
>>
>> - Original Message - From: "&#x
the fact it's also illegal. Even had it worked
>> flawlessly, I couldn't have kept it in good concience.
>>
>> I agree though, if there was a way to buy a mac ported stable mind you,
>> license for Eloquence, for OSX, I'd do it faster than a blink of an eye
ter than a blink of an eye! Darn
> straight I would! It's really about the only synth I can not only
> understand, but comfortably can listen to on and on for hours at a time.
>
> Chris.
>
> - Original Message - From: "'Kevin Cussick' via MacVision
stable mind you,
> license for Eloquence, for OSX, I'd do it faster than a blink of an eye! Darn
> straight I would! It's really about the only synth I can not only
> understand, but comfortably can listen to on and on for hours at a time.
>
> Chris.
>
> -
Eloquence is great because it is so familiar due to its popularity on a wide
variety of screen readers and other assistive technology products. But
realistically, it has not been in development since, I believe, the late 1990s.
For some perspective on that, the first public version of Mac OS X w
omfortably can listen to on and on for hours at a time.
>
> Chris.
>
> ----- Original Message - From: "'Kevin Cussick' via MacVisionaries"
>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 2:17 PM
> Subject: Re: time for Apple to get a new default voice
>
link of an eye!
Darn straight I would! It's really about the only synth I can not only
understand, but comfortably can listen to on and on for hours at a time.
Chris.
- Original Message -
From: "'Kevin Cussick' via MacVisionaries"
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 1
Well I use Fiona Compact and have it as fast as I can and love it. but
each to there own.
On 10/06/2015 20:16, Jonathan Mosen wrote:
Hi Christopher. I think it depends on the hearing loss. I've worked with people
for example with a hearing loss who find Alex unintelligible once you go a
littl
Hi!
Well, i think they should renew the hole voice collection.
Lets hope they do something.
/A
> 10 jun 2015 kl. 19:07 skrev Ray Foret Jr :
>
> Subject line pretty much says it all. Nothing against Alex mind you: but,
> frankly, I reckon it's high time Apple adopted a new and much more updated
Hello All,
I agree with you Jonathan. An official copy of Eloquence would be just fine
with me. I tried Ava and the responsiveness was sluggish in comparison to Alex.
Eventually, I needed to switch back to Alex.
Best,
Eileen
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 10, 2015, at 12:16 PM, Jonathan Mosen
Hi Christopher. I think it depends on the hearing loss. I've worked with people
for example with a hearing loss who find Alex unintelligible once you go a
little above the default rate, but who can have compact Daniel cranked up
remarkably fast.
Personally I'd be delighted to have Eloquence on m
If anyone has doubts that Alex will be kept on, then sending Apple
some feedback would be the ticket because Apple cannot read minds.
Alex is great for a male voice. Samantha is the best for a female
voice...almost. She eats some words so adding Siri would be a definite plus.
From E.T.'
I hope Alex stics around for a while. Historically it did for software voices
what dec-talk did in the 80s for hardware synths. However times were different
and Alex has always been more responsive than I ever remember dec being:).
> On Jun 10, 2015, at 2:28 PM, christopher hallsworth
> wrote:
i prefer alex. daniel gives me a headache if i listen to him too long.
> On 10 Jun 2015, at 19:28, christopher hallsworth
> wrote:
>
> Might be coming next year . Seriously though, I don't ever want Apple
> to remove Alex. He's fantastic for someone with moderately severe to profound
> hearin
Might be coming next year . Seriously though, I don't ever want Apple to
remove Alex. He's fantastic for someone with moderately severe to profound
hearing loss which I have. The other voices included are fine, but doesn't cut
it like Alex.
> On 10 Jun 2015, at 18:46, Shawn Krasniuk wrote:
>
>
Why not just keep updating Alex?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 10, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Ray Foret Jr wrote:
>
> Subject line pretty much says it all. Nothing against Alex mind you: but,
> frankly, I reckon it's high time Apple adopted a new and much more updated
> default voice. The new Siri
Hi Ray. I don't really want Apple to get rid of Alex. I lve the fact that he
takes breaths and everything. I am with you on one thing though, I hope Apple
considers making the Siri voices available in El Capitan. After all, you can
get them for NVDA in Windows so why can't it be done on the Mac?
30 matches
Mail list logo
