I think they should have called it trusty tahr.
On 09/21/2015 12:30 PM, Terje Strømberg wrote:
I like El Kapitan. Don’t sit and think about the OSX name while using the OSX.
Take care
21. sep. 2015 kl. 14:44 skrev Scott Granados :
Anything would be better. I propose OS X 10.11. As they do
I like El Kapitan. Don’t sit and think about the OSX name while using the OSX.
Take care
21. sep. 2015 kl. 14:44 skrev Scott Granados :
Anything would be better. I propose OS X 10.11. As they do with IOS they
could just stick to the numbers.
> On Sep 18, 2015, at 5:16 PM, Shawn Krasniuk wr
Anything would be better. I propose OS X 10.11. As they do with IOS they
could just stick to the numbers.
> On Sep 18, 2015, at 5:16 PM, Shawn Krasniuk wrote:
>
> I've got a question for you guys. If you think El Capitan is a stupid name
> for an OS, what would you rather have Apple call it?
Maybe Apple should have called it "Yosemite S" – of course I'm being facetious!
😏
– Bill and leader dog Holland
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
t
Why don't you take this to a chat room???...lol
-Original Message-
From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Blee Blat
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 14:38
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: El Kapitan.
> On Sep
El Capitan is a good name, but it could be worse. Its not worth
wasting mental energy on it.
From E.T.'s Keyboard...
ancient.ali...@icloud.com
Many believe that we have been visited
in the past. What if it were true?
On 9/18/2015 2:16 PM, Shawn Krasniuk wrote:
I've got a question for yo
> On Sep 18, 2015, at 17:16, Shawn Krasniuk wrote:
>
> I've got a question for you guys. If you think El Capitan is a stupid name
> for an OS, what would you rather have Apple call it? The only reason they
> called it El Capitan is to make additions to Yosemite.
Why even have code names at al
I've got a question for you guys. If you think El Capitan is a stupid name for
an OS, what would you rather have Apple call it? The only reason they called it
El Capitan is to make additions to Yosemite.
Shawn
Sent From My White MacBook
Facebook Username: Shawn Krasniuk
Twitter Handle: shawnk_ak
Hay type it in google and get all the history it is a granit peak about 3000
feet tall in yousemette national park in northern California.
Apple changed the name of o s x from animals after mt. lion, to land marks
-Original Message-
From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com [mailto:macvision
Kawal, the recent naming convention is places in California. El Capitan is the
tallest peek in Yosemite national park which is an amazing outdoor space in
California that has been reserved as a national park. Mavericks is a place off
the Northern California coast not far from Santa Cruz or San
This is quite off topic, so I'll let it rest after I say this, but it also,
in spanish, means the captain. I'm not sure which way they meant it.
Chris.
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Lamanche"
To:
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 3:48 PM
Subject: Re:
Since I live in California and camp in Yosemite about every 3 years, El Capitan
is the largest mountain peak in Yosemite. Since Apple has placed more emphasis
on fixing things in the El Capitan release, that's why they probably selected
it for the next OS.
Best,
Eileen
Sent from my iPhone
> O
It's a mountain in a national park in US. You might get some more info on
Google.
> On 17 Sep 2015, at 20:41, Kawal Gucukoglu wrote:
>
> Please could someone tell me where this place El Capitan is as I've never
> heard of it. Is it a small place and why do Apple choose such strange names?
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
