Aira, or by my eyes is your friend to start.btw this is the. Best
solution for all members of. The group.
> On Aug 26, 2024, at 19:16, Anders Holmberg wrote:
>
> Hi!
> So I have installed a trial of parallels desktop and it has started ub but I
> can not come any fur
Hi!
So I have installed a trial of parallels desktop and it has started ub but I
can not come any further from where I am.
What does:
kToolbarTitleLabelItemId text mean?
How do I come any further?
Bless.
/A
--
The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries
list
Mac OS sequoia You have absolutely no
worries right now.
If you only a silicon based Mac and you do plan to upgrade to Mac OS Sequoia, a
word of caution. If you???re using being fusion so far in beta testing, fusion
does not work if you have a series machine. I have found that parallels works
nd you have an
> > > > Intel face mark and you do not plan on upgrading to Mac OS sequoia You
> > > > have absolutely no worries right now.
> > > >
> > > > If you only a silicon based Mac and you do plan to upgrade to Mac OS
> > > > Sequoia, a
worries right now.
If you only a silicon based Mac and you do plan to upgrade to Mac OS Sequoia, a
word of caution. If you???re using being fusion so far in beta testing, fusion
does not work if you have a series machine. I have found that parallels works
much better than I have expected. The so
of caution. If you???re using being fusion so far in beta
> > testing, fusion does not work if you have a series machine. I have found
> > that parallels works much better than I have expected. The software seems
> > to work very well with the current version of Jaws for windows v
ly no
worries right now.
If you only a silicon based Mac and you do plan to upgrade to Mac OS Sequoia, a
word of caution. If you’re using being fusion so far in beta testing, fusion
does not work if you have a series machine. I have found that parallels works
much better than I have expected
ilicon based Mac and you do plan to upgrade to Mac OS
> Sequoia, a word of caution. If you’re using being fusion so far in beta
> testing, fusion does not work if you have a series machine. I have found
> that parallels works much better than I have expected. The software seems
> to work
parallels works
much better than I have expected. The software seems to work very well with the
current version of Jaws for windows version 2024. And NVDA. There are some
minor issues when using jaws outlook in windows with getting the Message view
table to expand. But I found that if you use the
absolutely no
worries right now.
If you only a silicon based Mac and you do plan to upgrade to Mac OS Sequoia, a
word of caution. If you’re using being fusion so far in beta testing, fusion
does not work if you have a series machine. I have found that parallels works
much better than I have
and windows
> apps. Any suggestions welcome. Thank you
> Sent from my IPhone
>
>
>> On Dec 30, 2023, at 1:41 PM, Maurice A. Mines wrote:
>>
>> Hi it. Comes down to personal chose. The. Real reason that Microsoft went
>> with Parallels, is the two compa
Hi!
I believe that Microsoft does not understand the importans of accessibility for
such purposes.
You. Can of corse use a windows computer with their own screenreader for
several tasks but when it comes to using Mac and then you need parallels using
windows seems to be to much for them to grip
; Hi it. Comes down to personal chose. The. Real reason that Microsoft went
> with Parallels, is the two companies offices are. Vary close to etch
> other. I know that this a vary small thing. But is is true. Both are in
> a subvert of. Seattle Washington.
>
> All o
Hi it. Comes down to personal chose. The. Real reason that Microsoft went
with Parallels, is the two companies offices are. Vary close to etch other.
I know that this a vary small thing. But is is true. Both are in a
subvert of. Seattle Washington.
All of that aside, it. Comes
sighted community
see Parallels to be superior to Fusion, but if that is only for the more OSX
feel to running Windows only, the looks don't matter for many of us that can't
see it. Maybe it really does bench and perform better in the real world,
especially with the graphics card, w
If you purchase an Apple silicon Mac, you can use Parallels with the version of
Windows for ARM processors, the company has been contacted by several voiceover
users about the lack of accessibility and it appears that the company has no
plans to address it.
> On Dec 29, 2023, at 10:48
I’m surprised you got Parallels to work, last time I tried it, it was
completely inaccessible with Voiceover.
> On Dec 29, 2023, at 10:02 AM, 'Matt Turner' via MacVisionaries
> wrote:
>
> Hi folks.
> I still have and intel mac and wanted to get a new one in the new
wn Media, LLC
> On Dec 29, 2023, at 8:02 AM, 'Matt Turner' via MacVisionaries
> wrote:
>
> Hi folks.
> I still have and intel mac and wanted to get a new one in the new year.
> I’ve been playing with Parallels, and so far I like it.
> I just can’t seem to get t
10:48 AM, 'Matt Turner' via MacVisionaries <macvisionaries@googlegroups.com> wrote:to set it up, I have to use VOCR to read the screen.My VO key is caps lock key.it’s like the VM doesn’t see the key.On Dec 29, 2023, at 11:44 AM, Phil Halton <philh...@gmail.com> wrote:Are you sayi
x27; via MacVisionaries
>> wrote:
>>
>> to set it up, I have to use VOCR to read the screen.
>> My VO key is caps lock key.
>> it’s like the VM doesn’t see the key.
>>
>>> On Dec 29, 2023, at 11:44 AM, Phil Halton >> <mailto:philh...@gmail.com&
ec 29, 2023, at 11:44 AM, Phil Halton > <mailto:philh...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Are you saying that parallels is now accessible at least to some degree? I
>> thought it was a complete black box for Mac voiceover users
>> Sent from my IPhone
>>
>>
&g
to set it up, I have to use VOCR to read the screen.
My VO key is caps lock key.
it’s like the VM doesn’t see the key.
> On Dec 29, 2023, at 11:44 AM, Phil Halton wrote:
>
> Are you saying that parallels is now accessible at least to some degree? I
> thought it was a complete black
Are you saying that parallels is now accessible at least to some degree? I thought it was a complete black box for Mac voiceover usersSent from my IPhoneOn Dec 29, 2023, at 11:14 AM, Jonathan Cohn wrote:As strange as it seems, telling VoiceOver to use the CAPSLOCK key and keeping VoiceOver
gt; wrote:
> Hi folks.
> I still have and intel mac and wanted to get a new one in the new year.
> I’ve been playing with Parallels, and so far I like it.
> I just can’t seem to get the Caps lock key to work with Jaws or NVDA.
> Does Anyone have any idea?
>
> --
> The following
Hi folks.
I still have and intel mac and wanted to get a new one in the new year.
I’ve been playing with Parallels, and so far I like it.
I just can’t seem to get the Caps lock key to work with Jaws or NVDA.
Does Anyone have any idea?
--
The following information is important for all members of
On 16/11/23 14:47, Maurice A. Mines wrote:
My question to the group is if the time to go back to VMware? Will VMware run
better when it comes to dealing with USB cable communication?
I don't know, but VMWare at least has an accessibility statement:
https://www.vmware.com/help/accessibility.h
Hi
I recently had my own difficulties with Parallels.
A few weeks ago I bought a brand new MacBook Pro 16 with M2 Pro, 32gb ram and
1tb ssd for using it with Parallels Pro 19 running Windows 11 and ArM Jaws 2023.
First of all Parallels isn’t very accessible with Voice Over (which I knew
y when it comes to actually
connecting the radios to the computer, because of parallels insistence that
there must be an inaccessible dialog box that demands that you okay the
communications port to be opened meaning it identifies the cable connected
properly but then refuses to actually allow U
Thanks Simon , I may look into vm fusion .
Ben Constantini
bennnyconstant...@gmail.com
> On Aug 14, 2019, at 3:27 AM, Simon Fogarty wrote:
>
> Parallels is a vm environment,
>
> Doesn’t work well for us if you use a screen reader,
> Or at least it didn’t
> Virtual
Parallels is a vm environment,
Doesn’t work well for us if you use a screen reader,
Or at least it didn’t
Virtual box or vm fusion are what you want to look at if you don’t want to go
with bootcamp.
From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com On
Behalf Of N2KPV
Sent: Wednesday, 14 August 2019 12
e . I heard there is a program called Parallels that may work with
> the Mac . Has anyone had experience with it ?
>
> Ben C. N2kpv
>
> --
> The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries
> list.
>
> If you have any questions or conc
Tnx Maurice , I will have to investigate VMware fusion.
Ben Constantini
bennnyconstant...@gmail.com
> On Aug 13, 2019, at 12:03 PM, maurice.mines wrote:
>
> Hi, as far as Pino parallels is not really usable unless something has
> changed. But VMware fusion is very usable. B
Hi, as far as Pino parallels is not really usable unless something has
changed. But VMware fusion is very usable. Both software packages do the
same thing. That is virtualize child operating systems when running OS X
as the host. I hope this helps.
Sincerely Maurice Mines.
Board member
commands you might want to try virtualbox.
> /A
>
>> 13 aug. 2019 kl. 14:55 skrev N2KPV > <mailto:bennnyconstant...@gmail.com>>:
>>
>> I have a police scanner that can only be programmed with Windows based
>> software . I heard there is a program call
I have a police scanner that can only be programmed with Windows based
software . I heard there is a program called Parallels that may work with
the Mac . Has anyone had experience with it ?
Ben C. N2kpv
--
The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries
Hi Chris,
Yes it’s been around since I think version 6 of parallels,
It allows you to have a vm setup on your mac computer and then if your out and
about and need to access your vm on that mac computer, you can setup parallels
on your IOS device and then start the vm up running a windows
Yes iPads are an apple product
If your asking if parallels can be used on an iPad etc then the answr is yes it
can!
The IOS app for Parallels works as a portal between the IOS device and a
computer that you have parallels setup and working on,
If you then have parallels running an OS such
Christopher-Mark Gilland
Sent: Thursday, 29 September 2016 2:59 AM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: parallels access
Last I knew, no. Not in the least. You'd be way better off with VMWare Fusion.
http://www.vmware.com/fusion
---
Christopher Gilland
JAWS Certified, 2016.
Tra
Huh? Parallels is available for iOS? This is new news to me. LOL! I wonder
what on earth it does? Now, you've got me curious.
---
Christopher Gilland
JAWS Certified, 2016.
Training Instructor.
i...@gillandmarketing.com
Phone: (704) 256-8010.
- Original Message -
From: ma
Its not.
/A
> 28 sep. 2016 kl. 15:15 skrev mattias :
>
> Sounds intresting
> But are it accessible?
>
> --
> The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries
> list.
>
> If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if
> you feel that a
Ah my bad..
I should have writed parallels access for ipad
Från: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com]
För Christopher-Mark Gilland
Skickat: den 28 september 2016 18:50
Till: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Ämne: Re: parallels access
My point was, you
My point was, you asked about Parallels, which is a mac based program which
runs on a mac. This is why I wrote and said it's not accessible, but to check
out Fusion. How was I to know ahead of time you didn't have a mac, and just
further for your info. No. Not everyone on here
Yes and ipads are from apple
Parallels access
But seems it are a rdp like client
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com]
För E.T.
Skickat: den 28 september 2016 18:21
Till: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Ämne: Re: SV
here maybe own a ipad only
Or maybe only iphone..
*Från:*macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
[mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com] *För *Christopher-Mark Gilland
*Skickat:* den 28 september 2016 17:56
*Till:* macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
*Ämne:* Re: parallels access
Well, you did! ask about
@googlegroups.com
Ämne: Re: parallels access
Well, you did! ask about this on a mac based mailing list, so, the assumption
was made. NO offense intended. I mean that with all due respect. Smile.
---
Christopher Gilland
JAWS Certified, 2016.
Training Instructor.
i...@gillandmarketing.com <mailt
-
From: mattias
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 10:39 AM
Subject: SV: parallels access
Yes if I owned a macbook
Från: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
[mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com] För Christopher-Mark Gilland
Skickat: den
Yes if I owned a macbook
Från: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com]
För Christopher-Mark Gilland
Skickat: den 28 september 2016 15:59
Till: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Ämne: Re: parallels access
Last I knew, no. Not in the least. You'd b
aries@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 9:15 AM
Subject: parallels access
Sounds intresting
But are it accessible?
--
The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries
list.
If you have any questions or concerns about the runni
Sounds intresting
But are it accessible?
--
The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries
list.
If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you
feel that a member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or
moderators
> Best,
>>>>> On Jul 12, 2015, at 2:41 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> There's not a command line, and no. It's still not accessible.
>>>>>
>>>>> What's wrong with
7;s wrong with VMWare Fusion, if you don't mind me asking?
Chris.
- Original Message - From: "Anders Holmberg"
To:
Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: parallels 10 accessibility
Hi!
I tried it two years ago and at that time it wasn’t accessible.
I don’t know
you aren’t kidding. once I plugged in a usb headset, it speed up to nearly
full normal when I run windows natively. I wonder why vmware can’t fix this.
I wish I could get a headphone with multiple connections at work, I need to
ware headphones, and will it is really awkward to ware 2 headph
Yes, that’s exactly what I meant: tell Fusion to treat your USB sound card just
as any other USB device. The downside of course is that now your Mac can’t
share audio output with your VM, but it’s definitely a boost for latency.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go
what do you mean? plug in a usb headset, and have windows route the audio
through that when running in the vm? Please elaborate
> On Jul 12, 2015, at 9:48 PM, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
>
> What about audio? Have you tried a USB audio interface or headset to see if
> the latency is cut simp
What about audio? Have you tried a USB audio interface or headset to see if
the latency is cut simply by avoiding VMWare sound emulation? In my
experience, it often is.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from th
;>>
>>> There's not a command line, and no. It's still not accessible.
>>>
>>> What's wrong with VMWare Fusion, if you don't mind me asking?
>>>
>>> Chris.
>>>
>>> - Original Message - From: "A
, Christopher-Mark Gilland
wrote:
There's not a command line, and no. It's still not accessible.
What's wrong with VMWare Fusion, if you don't mind me asking?
Chris.
- Original Message - From: "Anders Holmberg"
To:
Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 1:30 PM
Subject:
ble.
>
> What's wrong with VMWare Fusion, if you don't mind me asking?
>
> Chris.
>
> - Original Message - From: "Anders Holmberg"
> To:
> Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 1:30 PM
> Subject: Re: parallels 10 accessibility
>
>
> Hi!
&g
There's not a command line, and no. It's still not accessible.
What's wrong with VMWare Fusion, if you don't mind me asking?
Chris.
- Original Message -
From: "Anders Holmberg"
To:
Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: parallels 10 acce
c, so I can run some
> development software. Fusion can be very laggy, and I do not have a slow
> computer. I have a 2014 iMac, w/ i7 quad core 3.5ghz cpu, 32gb ram, and 1tb
> ssd.
>
> I have read that parallels is after than fusion.
>
> Is the parallels interface
iMac, w/ i7 quad core 3.5ghz cpu, 32gb ram, and 1tb
> ssd.
>
> I have read that parallels is after than fusion.
>
> Is the parallels interface accessible with voiceover on the mac?
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Bst,
>
> Juan
>
> --
&
Hi All,
I currently run vm fusion to load windows on my mac, so I can run some
development software. Fusion can be very laggy, and I do not have a slow
computer. I have a 2014 iMac, w/ i7 quad core 3.5ghz cpu, 32gb ram, and 1tb
ssd.
I have read that parallels is after than fusion.
Is the
Hi!
Its not accessible at all.
Sad because its cheeper than vmware.
/A
> 14 nov 2014 kl. 00:49 skrev Grant Hardy :
>
> Hi all,
>
> I hear a lot of people talking about VMWare on this list but don’t hear a lot
> of discussion about Parallels for Mac. Is anybody using Parallels
Thanks all for confirming that Parallels is not accessible. That will make the
purchasing decision easier. :)
Grant
Sent from mobile
On Nov 14, 2014, at 6:49 AM, Mike Arrigo wrote:
Unless something has changed, parallels is not accessible with voiceover and
the company seems to have no
Unless something has changed, parallels is not accessible with
voiceover and the company seems to have no interest in fixing this.
Original message:
Hi all,
I hear a lot of people talking about VMWare on this list but don’t hear
a lot of discussion about Parallels for Mac. Is anybody using
That's because Parallels is horrible in terms of accessibility. In other words,
inaccessible. Vmware is the total opposite though. Go figure.
> On 13 Nov 2014, at 23:49, Grant Hardy wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I hear a lot of people talking about VMWare on this list but do
Hi,
I checked this earlier this year and the problem wasn’t with running JAWS
within Parallels. The problem was with The Mac interface to Parallels. The
Menu bar wasn’t accessible with Voiceover. I didn’t test any further.
Marshall
> On Nov 13, 2014, at 6:36 PM, Faisal ali wrote:
>
I heard that it wasn’t accessible at all.
On Nov 13, 2014, at 3:49 PM, Grant Hardy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I hear a lot of people talking about VMWare on this list but don’t hear a lot
> of discussion about Parallels for Mac. Is anybody using Parallels to run
> Windows apps, as w
Hi all,
I hear a lot of people talking about VMWare on this list but don’t hear a lot
of discussion about Parallels for Mac. Is anybody using Parallels to run
Windows apps, as well as a screen reader, within OS X and how do you find its
accessibility and ease of use?
Best,
Grant
--
You
Hi!
No!
16 sep 2014 kl. 00:37 skrev Hank Smith, and Seeing-eye dog Iona
:
> Hello is
> Parallels vo friendly?
> it allows virtual machines on mac as well
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "MacVisionari
, 2014, at 18:37, Hank Smith, and Seeing-eye dog Iona
wrote:
> Hello is
> Parallels vo friendly?
> it allows virtual machines on mac as well
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "MacVisionaries" g
Hello is
Parallels vo friendly?
it allows virtual machines on mac as well
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to macvisionarie
You have a few options. You can use boot camp which allows you to
either boot the mac in to windows or the mac operating system. If you
want to use virtual machine software, fusion is the only option since
parallels is not accessible with voiceover, and the company seems to
have no interest in
Fusion all the way.
Parallels wasn't even accessible last i checked.
On Jan 11, 2013, at 12:49 PM, David Life wrote:
> My new 27" imac is coming next week and I will be an official mac switcher.
> Anybody have advice about which way to run windows is better within mac os
My new 27" imac is coming next week and I will be an official mac
switcher. Anybody have advice about which way to run windows is better
within mac os X? I have a couple of business programs that are windows
only. I currently use a windows seven computer with Zoom text magnified 6x
or so. M
ort for the virtual
machine software as well as full voiceover support in the guest which
is the better option, Fusion or Parallels and why? Note Windows won't
be run as a virtual machine so I'm not worried about Windows screen
reader support in the vm.
--
You received this message beca
the
> virtual machine software as well as full voiceover support in the guest which
> is the better option, Fusion or Parallels and why? Note Windows won't be run
> as a virtual machine so I'm not worried about Windows screen reader support
> in the vm.
>
> --
>
No question here, fusion is the way to go. Parallels is completely
inaccessible. People have been asking them to fix that for years, and
they have no interest in doing so. Go with fusion.
Original message:
My Girlfriend has a macbook pro that she is willing to let me use as a
secondary machine
My understanding is that Parallels is not accessible with VoiceOver. YOur best
and perhaps only option is Fusion if you wish to virtualize OSX.
Les
On Dec 20, 2012, at 8:19 AM, Jared wrote:
> My Girlfriend has a macbook pro that she is willing to let me use as a
> secondary machine to
else
stupid that would mess something up system wide instead of just effecting a
single user account on the machine. Since I need both basic voiceover
support for the virtual machine software as well as full voiceover support
in the guest which is the better option, Fusion or Parallels and why?
you who were wondering about the new parallels 7,
> it is totally inaccessible just as the previous versions are. When you launch
> the application you have the minimize and zoom buttons, the only other thing
> voiceover says is "unknown" Interacting or tabbing around does
Hi everyone, for those of you who were wondering about the new parallels 7, it
is totally inaccessible just as the previous versions are. When you launch the
application you have the minimize and zoom buttons, the only other thing
voiceover says is "unknown" Interacting or tabbing a
may do the
same, but I don't have high hopes for it working.
On Sep 14, 2011, at 8:42 PM, Justin Ekis wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> I was just wondering about this myself. Have you tried version 7 of Parallels
> yet? I'm starting with the assumption that it still is not accessible,
Hi Mike,
I was just wondering about this myself. Have you tried version 7 of Parallels
yet? I'm starting with the assumption that it still is not accessible, but I
plan to give each new version a fair try. If you've actually taken a look at
the new release first hand then I wo
Paralels is not accessible and the company seems to have no interest in fixing
this.
On Sep 14, 2011, at 12:54 PM, Anouk Radix wrote:
> Hi, All this talk about fusion has me wondering if anyone has tried parallels
> or if it is even accessible with vo? Not saying its better but its the
wrote:
> Hi, All this talk about fusion has me wondering if anyone has tried parallels
> or if it is even accessible with vo? Not saying its better but its the other
> major virtualisation tool for the mac so I was wondering why there is no talk
> about it?
> Greetings, Anouk,
Hi, All this talk about fusion has me wondering if anyone has tried parallels
or if it is even accessible with vo? Not saying its better but its the other
major virtualisation tool for the mac so I was wondering why there is no talk
about it?
Greetings, Anouk,
--
You received this message
m
Facebook/Twitter/Skype: kc5gni
On May 17, 2011, at 7:45 PM, Mike Arrigo wrote:
> Yes, parallels is not accessible with voiceover, fusion from vmware is a much
> better choice.
> On May 17, 2011, at 12:58 AM, Jenny Wood wrote:
>
>> Good day all. So basically, I am just now
Yes, parallels is not accessible with voiceover, fusion from vmware is a much
better choice.
On May 17, 2011, at 12:58 AM, Jenny Wood wrote:
> Good day all. So basically, I am just now toying with running windows inside
> of OS X. We already happen to have a copy of Parallels, so we d
part, what inspired
me to go ahead and get my machine setup to run windows inside of OS X. I
already have windows installed with Bootcamp, but I would so love to avoid the
inconvenience of booting up separately between windows and mac. Hopefully I
can back out of Parallels grace
opy of Parallels, so we decided to
> give it a try. Um, best I can tell, it's not voiceover compatible. I did
> some poking around on google and judging by the results I got, it's still
> not. For those of you who have tried it, would you find this to be accurate,
> or is
Good day all. So basically, I am just now toying with running windows inside
of OS X. We already happen to have a copy of Parallels, so we decided to give
it a try. Um, best I can tell, it's not voiceover compatible. I did some
poking around on google and judging by the results I got,
Go with Fusion, parallels is not accessible with voiceover. For some reason,
when parallels was developed, the company chose to use all nonstandard
controls, I have no idea why, but they seem to have no interest in correcting
this.
On Apr 13, 2011, at 3:23 PM, Ronald McEwan wrote:
> I h
yeah. 1 works with vo, one doesn't.
get fusion
ash
On 13/04/2011 21:23, Ronald McEwan wrote:
I have herd discussion of Fusion on the list but not parallels.
Can people comment on the difference between the two and if one is better with
VO than the other.
In the Journey,
Ron
-
I hear that Parallels has less lag than Fusion does, but all discussion I've
heard regarding Parallels seems to be only that it is inaccessible with VO. I
know of a lot of us VI Mac users who use Fusion. I myself use it and find it to
quite a smooth experience with VO.
Hth,
Rose
On A
I have herd discussion of Fusion on the list but not parallels.
Can people comment on the difference between the two and if one is better with
VO than the other.
In the Journey,
Ron
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MacVisionaries"
27;s demo of Fusion and how incredibly bad the audio was almost like
> a buffered stream or something. Is Parallels any better in this regard? How
> is switching between Mac and the Windows virtual machine handled with
> Parallels, and will it create conflicts with Jaws in hot key assign
DO not use parallels, it pretty much sucks the big one in terms of performance
and fusion is much more accessible.
Also, audio is not a problem under fusion. I'm not sure what you heard but I
run tons of apps under fusion at the same time as apps on the Mac and no
problems. Streaming
Hi there. I've been looking at running Windows on my Mac to play a couple
games and maybe to do a little streaming, probably with Stationplaylist. I
heard Sara's demo of Fusion and how incredibly bad the audio was almost like
a buffered stream or something. Is Parallels any bett
@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: vmware Fusion or Parallels Desktop
Thanks for the response. I looks good but based on what I've seen so far,
I'll have to go with VMWare Fusion.
Kev
On Jun 12, 2010, at 4:35 PM, Mary Otten wrote:
> I do not have personal experience with parallels. but there ha
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
