Or virtual box. I find vm fusion is very slow virtual box is not as accessible, but a lot faster
-----Original Message----- From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com [mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Mattingly Sent: Sunday, 13 June 2010 8:42 a.m. To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: vmware Fusion or Parallels Desktop Thanks for the response. I looks good but based on what I've seen so far, I'll have to go with VMWare Fusion. Kev On Jun 12, 2010, at 4:35 PM, Mary Otten wrote: > I do not have personal experience with parallels. but there have been notes on this list in the past stating that Parallels was completely unusable with VO. > > mary > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. > To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
