> On Jan 21, 2022, at 00:05, Greg Earle wrote:
[...]
> My-Mac-mini:/ root# egrep " Error |build error"
> /opt/local/var/macports/logs/_private_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_macports_release_tarballs_ports_devel_gettext/gettext-tools-libs/main.log
> :info:build error CS0006: Me
On Jan 20, 2022, at 17:05, Greg Earle wrote:
> Is anyone still using/building on Sierra?
Sure. We still produce binaries for Mac OS X 10.6 and later.
> it tries to build gettext-tools-libs @0.21_0+universal and croaks.
I saw a build failure of one of the gettext subports, might've been
gettex
On Jan 20, 2022, at 22:12, Gabriel Rosenkoetter wrote:
> I didn't have the perl5 port installed on this system at all, just the
> several perl5.xx ports. So I did `sudo port install perl5`.
>
> And that's neat, but:
>
> [58] (gr@wedge:~)% which perl
> /opt/local/bin/perl
> [59] (gr@wedge:~)% ls
On 21 Jan 2022, at 4:14, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jan 20, 2022, at 17:05, Greg Earle wrote:
Not sure if this is something to file a bug report on in Trac or if
it's operator error on my part?
We would need to see the contents of the main.log file to determine
what's going on. The best way t
On 2022-01-21 00:21 EST, Kastus Shchuka wrote:
You got the link /opt/local/bin/perl -> perl5.28 from the default variant of
perl5 as you did not specify which variant you wanted.
Yep, I understood that, and that's exactly what I would've expected: I
just didn't realize that system didn't even
On 2022-01-21 05:21 EST, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
As was already mentioned, the /opt/local/bin/perl symlink is controlled by the
perl5 port, so install it with whatever variant you wish.
I had to glance back and forth a couple times there. I… guess you're
also "Kastus Shchuka"? :^>
Yes, that was
On 2022-01-21 20:43 EST, Gabriel Rosenkoetter wrote:
On 2022-01-21 05:21 EST, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
As was already mentioned, the /opt/local/bin/perl symlink is
controlled by the perl5 port, so install it with whatever variant you
wish.
I had to glance back and forth a couple times there. I… gues
> On Jan 21, 2022, at 5:42 PM, Gabriel Rosenkoetter wrote:
>
> On 2022-01-21 00:21 EST, Kastus Shchuka wrote:
>> You got the link /opt/local/bin/perl -> perl5.28 from the default variant of
>> perl5 as you did not specify which variant you wanted.
>
> Yep, I understood that, and that's exact
On 2022-01-21 23:48 EST, Kastus Shchuka wrote:
If you want to see just the active port, you may trim down the output like this:
$ port installed and active and perl5
The following ports are currently installed:
perl5 @5.28.3_0+perl5_30 (active)
Hope this helps to reduce confusion.
Thank yo
I am afraid there is still confusion about port info action. According to the
man page, it merely "Displays meta-information available for portname". This
information comes from port definition, not from port installation. You may run
"port info" on any port, regardless whether it is installed o
On 2022-01-22 01:28 EST, Kastus Shchuka wrote:
Please note a clash of terms as there is port action "installed" and port pseudo-portname "installed". That is why "port
installed" is a valid syntax ("installed" is an action here), while "port active" is not. You have to use action "echo" with
"a
11 matches
Mail list logo
