On Apr 5, 2016, at 2:08 AM, Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
> Ryan it's like this: `sudo port install xorg-server` didn't install XQuartz,
> I had to manually download XQuartz and install it or no display was ever
> found.
> Once I've done that, everything was OK.
We need to be a little more precise w
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 3:08 AM, Andrea Giammarchi <
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ryan it's like this: `sudo port install xorg-server` didn't install
> XQuartz, I had to manually download XQuartz and install it or no display
> was ever found.
Did you log out and back in to activate the l
Ryan it's like this: `sudo port install xorg-server` didn't install
XQuartz, I had to manually download XQuartz and install it or no display
was ever found.
Once I've done that, everything was OK.
I can reproduce this every single time ( I have a timemachine restore point
right after a fresh clean
On Apr 3, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
> It looks like installing `xorg-server` and `xinit` won't solve the problem; I
> had to install XQuartz a part.
The software available via the XQuartz.org web site is the same as the software
available in the various xorg-* ports in MacPor
On Apr 3, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2016-4-4 01:46 , Clemens Lang wrote:
>> I think we should add an additional MPL-2-NoRelicensing (or "MPL-2
>> GPLConflict") license to denote the few ports that explicitly do not
>> have the exception.
>
> Making the dual licensing explicit see
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> xorg-server and xinit ports
If I recall correctly xinit is already included inside the xorg-server port.
--
Eneko Gotzon Ares
enekogot...@gmail.com
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-user
On 2016-4-4 01:46 , Clemens Lang wrote:
Hi Josh,
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 01:06:50AM +1000, Joshua Root wrote:
MPL 2.0 is GPL compatible only by way of an optional clause that
allows relicensing under the GPL. Some software is under MPL-2 but has
an "Incompatible With Secondary Licenses" notice.
Hi Josh,
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 01:06:50AM +1000, Joshua Root wrote:
> MPL 2.0 is GPL compatible only by way of an optional clause that
> allows relicensing under the GPL. Some software is under MPL-2 but has
> an "Incompatible With Secondary Licenses" notice. If a port uses the
> version of MPL-
It looks like installing `xorg-server` and `xinit` won't solve the problem;
I had to install XQuartz a part.
Since that's the default backend for macports Gtk3, wouldn't make sense to
have it installed as Gtk3 dependency? Or, at least, as `gjs` one.
Anyway, thanks for the hint.
Best Regards
On
On 2016-4-4 00:45 , Clemens Lang wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 04:05:02PM +0200, Clemens Lang wrote:
Doesn't seem like it will:
$ port_binary_distributable.tcl -v mozjs24
"mozjs24" is not distributable because its license "mpl" conflicts with license "GPL-3+"
of dependency "gdbm"
Actua
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Brandon Allbery
wrote:
> Install XQuartz
I should mention that MacPorts defaults to building gtk with +x11 because
many gtk-using programs either do not build or do not work properly with
gtk +quartz. If you want to try it anyway, you would remove the gtk ports
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 03:49:01PM +0100, Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
> ```
> gjs -c 'imports.gi.Gtk.init(null);'
>
> (gjs 999): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display:
> ```
That looks like you don't have XQuartz installed. MacPorts' copy of Gtk
uses an X11 backend, which requires that you have X
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Andrea Giammarchi <
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've also noticed, after successfully installing `gjs`, that it doesn't
> work anyway.
>
> ```
> gjs -c 'imports.gi.Gtk.init(null);'
>
> (gjs 999): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display:
> ```
>
Install XQuar
Thanks!
I've also noticed, after successfully installing `gjs`, that it doesn't
work anyway.
```
gjs -c 'imports.gi.Gtk.init(null);'
(gjs 999): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display:
```
This one also works on homebrew (I'm trying to test Gtk+ configuration
through both installers)
Any idea how
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 04:05:02PM +0200, Clemens Lang wrote:
> Doesn't seem like it will:
>
> $ port_binary_distributable.tcl -v mozjs24
> "mozjs24" is not distributable because its license "mpl" conflicts with
> license "GPL-3+" of dependency "gdbm"
Actually, mozjs24's license is MPL-2.0,
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 02:24:28PM +0100, Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
> Installing `gjs` brings in a lot of modules and `mozjs24` is one of
> these.
>
> There are pre-built binaries via homebrew and `mozjs24` has been
> around for very long time so it surprises me it needs to be built via
> macp
Hi everyone!
Installing `gjs` brings in a lot of modules and `mozjs24` is one of these.
There are pre-built binaries via homebrew and `mozjs24` has been around for
very long time so it surprises me it needs to be built via macports.
It's also actually the only one that needs this step, everythin
17 matches
Mail list logo
