On Apr 3, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Joshua Root <j...@macports.org> wrote: > On 2016-4-4 01:46 , Clemens Lang wrote: >> I think we should add an additional MPL-2-NoRelicensing (or "MPL-2 >> GPLConflict") license to denote the few ports that explicitly do not >> have the exception. > > Making the dual licensing explicit seems less confusing to me than calling > the same license two different names.
I agree. If we really wanted two different names, I think it would make more sense to leave MPL-2 the way it is and add MPL-2-GPLException [but this seems really similar to GPL + OpenSSLException, so to me it seems simplest to handle it similarly] -- Daniel J. Luke _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
