On Oct 13, 2015, at 9:35 PM, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
> On Oct 13, 2015, at 5:19 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> On Oct 13, 2015, at 2:43 PM, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
>>
>>> It turns out that for the moment 2. didn’t work, as you had suggested, it
>>> seems that there is a bug that the OpenModelica has t
> On Oct 13, 2015, at 5:19 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 13, 2015, at 2:43 PM, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
>
>> It turns out that for the moment 2. didn’t work, as you had suggested, it
>> seems that there is a bug that the OpenModelica has to fix for the new
>> qt4-mac layout. Is there
+1
I would suggest looking at how the binary distros build their gmp. We
should do the same thing in our port for the default no-variants case,
and have a variant that forces a local build and gives better runtime
performance.
Personally I don't need gfactor from coreutils to run at peak efficien
On Oct 13, 2015, at 9:12 AM, Rodolfo Aramayo wrote:
> Is anyone else also getting this error?
>
> Suggestions?
>
> Thanks
>
> --R
>
> $ port -v selfupdate
> ---> Updating MacPorts base sources using rsync
> receiving file list ... done
>
> sent 36 bytes received 69 bytes 70.00 bytes/sec
>
It would probably be a useful variant on the port (and if I were the
maintainer, it would probably be the default - if only so that people could get
a binary archive).
> On Oct 13, 2015, at 5:21 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Oct 13, 2015, at 1:06 PM, Thomas Bodlien wrote:
>> it is really great,
On Oct 13, 2015, at 9:22 AM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Sepideh Razavi wrote:
>> So I cleaned all the ports and uninstalled macports, then built again from
>> the source. Again run into signature verification failure step but this time
>> even at the self update s
On Oct 13, 2015, at 6:55 AM, Sepideh Razavi wrote:
> So I cleaned all the ports and uninstalled macports, then built again from
> the source. Again run into signature verification failure step but this time
> even at the self update step (where I had no issues before):
>
> hawkeye:1-Analysis s
On Oct 13, 2015, at 1:06 PM, Thomas Bodlien wrote:
> it is really great, that Macports-Software is compiled with
> Haswell-Optimizations.
> But I want to bundle libgmp with an App.
> How can I compile a universal Version of the Library?
MacPorts doesn't specifically request haswell optimization
On Oct 13, 2015, at 2:43 PM, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
> It turns out that for the moment 2. didn’t work, as you had suggested, it
> seems that there is a bug that the OpenModelica has to fix for the new
> qt4-mac layout. Is there any documentation, or hints, explaining the new
> layout, or what
> On Oct 8, 2015, at 10:02 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 8, 2015, at 8:34 AM, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
>
>> On Oct 8, 2015, at 8:57 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 7, 2015, at 9:53 AM, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
>>>
Is there a way that I can rebuild and reactivate an older versi
Hello,
it is really great, that Macports-Software is compiled with
Haswell-Optimizations.
But I want to bundle libgmp with an App.
How can I compile a universal Version of the Library?
Thomas Bodlien
creative-software-des...@t-online.de
___
macports
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Sepideh Razavi
wrote:
> So I cleaned all the ports and uninstalled macports, then built again from
> the source. Again run into signature verification failure step but this
> time even at the self update step (where I had no issues before):
I believe that was ci
So I cleaned all the ports and uninstalled macports, then built again from
the source. Again run into signature verification failure step but this
time even at the self update step (where I had no issues before):
hawkeye:1-Analysis srazavi$ sudo port -v -d selfupdate
DEBUG: Copying /Users/srazavi
On 2015-10-13 11:47, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Tuesday October 13 2015 11:32:58 Aljaž Srebrnič wrote:
>
>>
>> Oh, so *that's* why wireshark can’t find QtCore...
>
> That's only partly true. The main reason may simply be that it doesn't use
> the Qt4 Portgroup like it should.
>
> It's a pity
On Tuesday October 13 2015 11:32:58 Aljaž Srebrnič wrote:
>
> Oh, so *that's* why wireshark can’t find QtCore...
That's only partly true. The main reason may simply be that it doesn't use the
Qt4 Portgroup like it should.
It's a pity that there's nothing in base to print a warning (or raise an
> On 13 ott 2015, at 10:02, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
>
> Just saw this in a log of a build against the "nouveau" qt4-mac port:
>
> PKG_CONFIG_PATH='/opt/local/libexec/qt4/lib/pkgconfig'
>
> Voilà what putting everything in a sandboxy leads to, situations à la
> HomeBrew that I don't even have a
On Tuesday October 06 2015 17:29:02 René J.V. Bertin wrote:
>On Tuesday October 06 2015 07:47:03 Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>> > On Oct 6, 2015, at 3:20 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
>
>> We have:
>> man porthier
Just saw this in a log of a build against the "nouveau" qt4-mac port:
PKG_CONFIG_PATH=
17 matches
Mail list logo
