On Oct 13, 2015, at 9:35 PM, Adam Dershowitz wrote: > On Oct 13, 2015, at 5:19 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> On Oct 13, 2015, at 2:43 PM, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> >>> It turns out that for the moment 2. didn’t work, as you had suggested, it >>> seems that there is a bug that the OpenModelica has to fix for the new >>> qt4-mac layout. Is there any documentation, or hints, explaining the new >>> layout, or what changes might be necessary? Any guidance that I can pass >>> along to those developers would be appreciated. >>> For now, I ended up doing 2, then having to downgrade qt4-mac as well, to >>> get it to build, ,then having to downgrade a few other ports, to go with >>> the old qt4-mac layout. >> >> I believe the intention is that if the port developer uses the qt4 1.0 or >> qmake 1.0 portgroups, and the variables therein, things should just work, >> and all that should be needed after the layout changes is a revbump to >> rebuild the port. > > The only info I can find is this: > https://guide.macports.org/chunked/reference.portgroup.html and it doesn’t > say anything about qt4 or qmake. Currently, the OpenModelica port doesn’t > use portgroups. Any suggestions for how to potentially get that port to use, > would be very helpful. That could potentially include incorporation of > portgroups in the port. The existing port works with qt4 4.8.7_1 and now > fails with 4.8.7_2, and I am not really sure what variables are necessary, or > how to fix it.
Correct, many portgroup are not documented in the guide. In those situations, the documentation is the portgroup file itself -- the source code and any comments -- and also any existing ports using the portgroup. _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
