Re: [GSoC 2019] Web App Project Update

Dear all, This is another update regarding the Webapp GSoC'19 project. We are now in the second month of coding. The project is going nearly at same pace as scheduled in the proposal [1]. The demo of the app has been moved to an EC2 instance where it is running in a Docker container: http://ec2-5

Re: [GSoC 2019] Web App Project Update

Hi, This is just to say a huge thank you to everyone who volunteered to contribute. In just a week we collected statistics from nearly half as many machines compared to our existing (semi-official) site. At the moment the site is only showing OS version distribution, but we expect other data to be

Re: [GSoC 2019] Web App Project Update

Dear Arjun, Thanks a lot for sending out the report. Dear MacPorts users, I would warmly welcome everyone to check what has been done so far, provide feedback, but in particular volunteer to run sudo port install mpstats-gsoc to help us get more statistics ready by the time Arjun starts work

[GSoC 2019] Web App Project Update

Hi, I am working on the web app to collect build and installation statistics and show information about ports, maintainers etc. Repository: https://github.com/macports/macports-webapp We have deployed a demo on Heroku: https://frozen-falls-98471.herokuapp.com . Any feedback and feature requests

Re: GSOC 2019 project: Improvements of Buildbot views (@ MacPorts)

On Jun 3, 2019, at 15:51, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > On Sun, 2 Jun 2019 at 18:46, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> Buildbot is a program that we want to use for its own sake, so its port name >> should not begin with "py-" and it should be in a primary category that >> reflects its use. Look at the e

Re: GSOC 2019 project: Improvements of Buildbot views (@ MacPorts)

On Sun, 2 Jun 2019 at 18:30, Rajdeep Bharati wrote: > On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 9:45 PM Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > Got it, thanks for your help. One thing is that when I install the new > py37-buildbot, the command that I get to use is `buildbot-3.7`. > What changes do I need to make in the port to us

Re: GSOC 2019 project: Improvements of Buildbot views (@ MacPorts)

Hi, In this case I have a feature request for Karan ... On Sun, 2 Jun 2019 at 18:46, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Jun 2, 2019, at 11:30, Rajdeep Bharati wrote: > > > One thing is that when I install the new py37-buildbot, the command that I > > get to use is `buildbot-3.7`. > > What changes do I nee

Re: GSOC 2019 project: Improvements of Buildbot views (@ MacPorts)

Thank you for the clarification. I will update the old buildbot. Regards Rajdeep On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 10:16 PM Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > > On Jun 2, 2019, at 11:30, Rajdeep Bharati wrote: > > > One thing is that when I install the new py37-buildbot, the command that > I get to use is `buildbot-

Re: GSOC 2019 project: Improvements of Buildbot views (@ MacPorts)

On Jun 2, 2019, at 11:30, Rajdeep Bharati wrote: > One thing is that when I install the new py37-buildbot, the command that I > get to use is `buildbot-3.7`. > What changes do I need to make in the port to use the command `buildbot`? As Rainer explained in https://github.com/macports/macport

Re: GSOC 2019 project: Improvements of Buildbot views (@ MacPorts)

On May 29, 2019, at 13:29, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > As an intermezzo I want to explain one thing. Initially we had one single job > (which could run for days), and it built all the ports in a single job. > However one could not infer any information about what worked and what failed > without

Re: GSOC 2019 project: Improvements of Buildbot views (@ MacPorts)

On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 9:45 PM Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > > On May 31, 2019, at 17:27, Rajdeep Bharati wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 2:01 AM Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > > >> What does > >> port installed '*buildbot*' > >> say? > > > > It's giving None of the specified ports are installed. >

Re: GSOC 2019 project: Improvements of Buildbot views (@ MacPorts)

On May 31, 2019, at 17:27, Rajdeep Bharati wrote: > On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 2:01 AM Mojca Miklavec wrote: > >> What does >> port installed '*buildbot*' >> say? > > It's giving None of the specified ports are installed. It should show you all ports that are installed whose names contain th

Re: GSOC 2019 project: Improvements of Buildbot views (@ MacPorts)

On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 2:01 AM Mojca Miklavec wrote: > Dear Rajdeep, > > I'm sorry, I somewhat missed this one particular error. > > You need to install py37-buildbot rather than py-buildbot, same for > py37-buildbot-pkg and mock (probably py37-mock). > > Yes I installed the one with py37-*. > O

Re: GSOC 2019 project: Improvements of Buildbot views (@ MacPorts)

On Thu, 30 May 2019 at 16:43, Rajdeep Bharati wrote: > > How do we decide which ports are supposed to be built? Is it only the ports > (files) that are affected by a particular `change`? We fetch a list of modified directories. Then a bash script from mpbb runs though all of the ports in those di

Re: GSOC 2019 project: Improvements of Buildbot views (@ MacPorts)

On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 11:59 PM Mojca Miklavec wrote: > (CC-ing Arjun as parts of this might be of interest for the app as well, > and the general mailing list as they might provide further feedback.) > > On Wed, 29 May 2019 at 08:57, Rajdeep Bharati > wrote: > >> Hi, >> I wanted to be sure abo

Re: GSOC 2019 project: Improvements of Buildbot views (@ MacPorts)

(CC-ing Arjun as parts of this might be of interest for the app as well, and the general mailing list as they might provide further feedback.) On Wed, 29 May 2019 at 08:57, Rajdeep Bharati wrote: > Hi, > I wanted to be sure about one thing: > In view #2 > Screenshot 2019-05-29 at 12.21.13 PM.pn

GSOC 2019 Coding period starts tomorrow

Dear Students, Mentors & others, We are all enthusiastic about the most productive part of the GSOC that's officially about to start tomorrow. We have so many projects this year that it became non-trivial to keep all the relevant URLs in the memory. Please check if I got all the details right:

Re: GSOC 2019 project: Improvements of Buildbot views (@ MacPorts)

I re-up buildbot.buildbot.net But the console view is broken. https://github.com/buildbot/buildbot/issues/4777 Can you also have a look at this? I can also see that buildbot_travis do not build anymore https://github.com/buildbot/buildbot/issues/4778 probably I did merge the webpack PR a bit to

Re: GSOC 2019 project: Improvements of Buildbot views (@ MacPorts)

Can you please make a PR? Thanks Pierre Le mar. 21 mai 2019 à 16:21, Rajdeep Bharati a écrit : > > There's a bug in > https://github.com/buildbot/buildbot/blob/master/www/base/src/app/app.module.js > Changes haven't been `require`d. > These lines need to be added: > require('./changes/changes.c

Re: GSOC 2019 project: Improvements of Buildbot views (@ MacPorts)

Ouch, and we have https://buildbot.buildbot.net/ which is down (probably because of that ) looking at it.. Pierre Le mar. 21 mai 2019 à 15:57, Rajdeep Bharati a écrit : > > Hi > > I am having one issue with the buildbot (I think it's happening after the new > webpack PR, but not sure). > In the

Re: GSOC 2019 project: Improvements of Buildbot views (@ MacPorts)

Hi, The buildbot_badges plugin is using cairo. You can try to uninstall that to move forward Pierre Le sam. 18 mai 2019 à 07:58, Rajdeep Bharati a écrit : > > Hi, > I was trying out the webpack PR. Here's what I did: > > clone the branch git clone --single-branch --branch www-webpack > https://

Re: GSoC 2019 [Collect build statistics]

Nice. Makes testing a lot easier now. It would be great if you could push the Dockerfile as well. Also, I am not liking conversing on these multiple broken threads very much. I'll try to setup Matrix (have absolutely no idea about it yet) today so that we can compare gitter and matrix and move ahe

Re: GSOC 2019 project: Improvements of Buildbot views (@ MacPorts)

Ok cool! Thanks Rajdeep On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 1:29 PM Pierre Tardy wrote: > Hi Rajdeep, > > Buildbot calculates the version number based on tags. You you have to > fetch all the tags so that the version is correctly calculated. > > git fetch --tags --all > > then you can re-do the make virtua

Re: GSOC 2019 project: Improvements of Buildbot views (@ MacPorts)

Hi Rajdeep, Buildbot calculates the version number based on tags. You you have to fetch all the tags so that the version is correctly calculated. git fetch --tags --all then you can re-do the make virtualenv Regards Pierre Le mar. 14 mai 2019 à 11:39, Rajdeep Bharati a écrit : > > Thanks for

Re: GSoC 2019 [Collect build statistics]

Dear Arjun, I'm CC-ing the list as that's potentially interesting to others as well. On Tue, 14 May 2019 at 19:45, Arjun Salyan wrote: > Summary of today's discussion: > > 1. *Repository: *The existing repository for the web app would be moved > from the staging area to the official MacPorts org

Re: GSOC 2019 project: Improvements of Buildbot views (@ MacPorts)

Thanks for the feedback! I had a doubt in buildbot: When I install buildbot from source (github), then why is it showing version 2.1.1dev... installed? Shouldn't it show the latest version (2.3.0)? It is up to date with the master branch. Thank you. Rajdeep On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 3:17 AM Mojca

Re: GSOC 2019 project: Improvements of Buildbot views (@ MacPorts)

On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 21:00, Rajdeep Bharati wrote: > > Hi, > > I created some issues and found some which would be relevant for the project > (as discussed in the IRC meeting): > > https://github.com/buildbot/buildbot/issues/4760 > https://github.com/buildbot/buildbot/issues/4761 > https://github

Re: GSOC 2019 project: Improvements of Buildbot views (@ MacPorts)

> Could you add them to the project ? Done.

Re: GSOC 2019 project: Improvements of Buildbot views (@ MacPorts)

Hi, I created some issues and found some which would be relevant for the project (as discussed in the IRC meeting): https://github.com/buildbot/buildbot/issues/4760 https://github.com/buildbot/buildbot/issues/4761 https://github.com/buildbot/buildbot/issues/4709 https://github.com/buildbot/buildb

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

Sure, I will try them out. Thanks On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 11:29 AM Mojca Miklavec wrote: > Dear Rajdeep, > > On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 12:38, Rajdeep Bharati wrote: > > > > About the npm dependencies: Can't it be taken care of by using > buildbot-www from pypi? > > While I'm not yet sure about the

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

Dear Rajdeep, On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 12:38, Rajdeep Bharati wrote: > > About the npm dependencies: Can't it be taken care of by using buildbot-www > from pypi? While I'm not yet sure about the npm packages situation, I looked a bit around and bumped into https://www.freshports.org/devel/py-b

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 12:38, Rajdeep Bharati wrote: > > I think one more port needs to be created: autobahn. > (https://docs.buildbot.net/current/manual/installation/requirements.html) If it's not in the ports tree yet, I believe I have this port on my computer already. (I can check when I come

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

I think one more port needs to be created: autobahn . ( https://docs.buildbot.net/current/manual/installation/requirements.html) About the npm dependencies: Can't it be taken care of by using buildbot-www from pypi? Rajd

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

Dear Mojca, Root privileges worked using vim. The new ports are shown in the port search. Thanks a lot. Rajdeep On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 3:09 PM Mojca Miklavec wrote: > Dear Rajdeep, > > I'm not sure to what extent my suggestion helps. If the file is in > fact locked, this won't do it, but I fin

Re: GSoC 2019 [Collect build statistics]

On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 at 19:50, Arjun Salyan wrote: > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 3:03 AM Mojca Miklavec wrote: > >> One thing that "urgently" needs to be done is to obfuscate the email >> >> (if written at all). I'm not even sure whether we actually want the >> email being displayed there. We need it to

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 09:12, Rajdeep Bharati wrote: > > Hello, > For testing a new Portfile in my local repository, the Macports guide says > that I need to edit the sources.conf file. However, this file is locked and > I'm not able to unlock it. Did you try with root privileges? I don't know

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

Hello, For testing a new Portfile in my local repository, the Macports guide says that I need to edit the sources.conf file. However, this file is locked and I'm not able to unlock it. Could you tell me the right way to tackle this? Also, do I need to have a distfile and/or tarball to generate chec

Re: GSoC 2019 [Collect build statistics]

/ detect any breakages in the future. > Thank you. Since, I am currently working on parsing of maintainers I began testing from maintainers only. It helped me make significant improvements to the code which extracted the maintainers ( added to the pull request : https://github.com/macports-gsoc/mac

Re: GSoC 2019 [Collect build statistics]

Dear Arjun, I'll answer individual questions & provide further suggestion separately. Given the current state of the app with sufficient complexity, I believe that it would be wise to introduce some unit tests to be able to extensively test what happens with data you import, and to prevent / dete

Re: GSoC 2019 [Collect build statistics]

Hi Mojca, On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 3:03 AM Mojca Miklavec wrote: > Awesome! Thank You. One thing that "urgently" needs to be done is to obfuscate the email > (if written at all). I'm not even sure whether we actually want the > email being displayed there. We need it to send automated emails f

Re: GSoC 2019 [Collect build statistics]

Dear Arjun, Thanks a lot for the update. On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 16:15, Arjun Salyan wrote: > > I have added maintainer views and tables to the demo app. > > List of maintainers is clickable on the port-detail page. > A maintainer-detail view that display info and list of maintained ports Awesome

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

Thanks, I'll attempt this. Rajdeep On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 8:26 PM Mojca Miklavec wrote: > Dear Rajdeep, > > On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 14:02, Rajdeep Bharati wrote: > > > > I had a doubt regarding the creation of buildbot 2.x Portfile: Would > writing a Portfile be sufficient or would there need t

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

Dear Rajdeep, On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 14:02, Rajdeep Bharati wrote: > > I had a doubt regarding the creation of buildbot 2.x Portfile: Would writing > a Portfile be sufficient or would there need to be other changes to the ports > tree as well? We would presumably move the contents of the existi

Re: GSoC 2019 [Collect build statistics]

Hi, I have added maintainer views and tables to the demo app. - List of maintainers is clickable on the port-detail page. - A maintainer-detail view that display info and list of maintained ports Examples: maintainer-detail: https://frozen-falls-98471.herokuapp.com/maintainer/ryandesign__m

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

I had a doubt regarding the creation of buildbot 2.x Portfile: Would writing a Portfile be sufficient or would there need to be other changes to the ports tree as well? Rajdeep On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 9:24 PM Mojca Miklavec wrote: > Dear Rajdeep, > > On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 17:27, Rajdeep Bharati

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

Dear Rajdeep, On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 17:27, Rajdeep Bharati wrote: > > Here's a poc of buildbot workers running on mac VM using libvirt (thought I'm > not sure whether this is the kind of thing we need): > https://github.com/nextgis/buildbot Cool, nice find! I don't know how hard it would be to

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

Here's a poc of buildbot workers running on mac VM using libvirt (thought I'm not sure whether this is the kind of thing we need): https://github.com/nextgis/buildbot I have submitted a final proposal with some more changes. I'm sorry for being late (since there are just a couple of hours left for

Re: GSoC 2019 [Phase out dependency on Xcode]

Hi Mojca, Clemens, and everyone. Thank you for the feedback and comments, I've incorporated the suggestions and submitted my final proposal. On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 3:50 AM Clemens Lang wrote: > I've left a couple of comments in your Google Doc, but overall yours is > a solid proposal. Sorry for

GSoC 2019 submission deadline is today

Hello, *I apologize for another email which may not be of interest to many of the members here but till we figure out a new channel for GSoC (and more such) activities, I believe there is no other option than using -dev.* With only a few hours left in final submissions, I advise the students to s

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

Ok, thanks. One more thing: You were talking about some issues with the Collection class in buildbot data which is not well compatible with Vue. Could you specify the kind of issues? Thanks and regards Rajdeep On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 1:44 AM Pierre Tardy wrote: > A javascript library which you c

Re: GSoC 2019 - trace mode improvements

On Sunday, 07/04/2019 15:59 CEST, Mihir Luthra <1999mihir.lut...@gmail.com> wrote: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/15cVbH6f6hBr9HryJEHUZEbRsToN1BAjY8My-oRstO9A/edit#heading=h.ng3lyvrem2d1 > > This doc is really clumsy tbh, and more like just rough notes made by me. > Though the links to le

Re: GSoC 2019 - trace mode improvements

On Sunday, 07/04/2019 15:15 CEST, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> > Maybe we should be doing a better job in marketing :( > > My question is: what would we need to have done in order for the news > to have reached you one month (or more) ago? It is an hard question; the first thing that arise in my m

Re: GSoC 2019 - Feedback request

Dear Mojca, Thank you for merging the PR. And Thank you for giving me some ideas to study on and decide what I would like to work on as this GSoC. Here is my updated proposal : https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RUmFN7PSPqbGzH4h8Hqq-qkTFgS3XJ_bIrsq7GhikYE/edit?usp=sharing Can't wait

Re: GSoC 2019 [Collect build statistics]

Dear Arjun, On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 20:31, Arjun Salyan wrote: > > Dear MacPorts Community, > > I have submitted my Final Proposal. I do understand that during these last > hours it might not be possible to give feedback on the proposals. But if I am > lucky enough to get more of them, I will try

Re: GSoC 2019 [Phase out dependency on Xcode]

Hi Satryaji, On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 10:44:43AM +0700, Satryaji Aulia wrote: > Hi Clemens, I'd also like your feedback on my proposal, particularly > about Xcode dependency. What do you think? I've left a couple of comments in your Google Doc, but overall yours is a solid proposal. Sorry for only

Re: GSoC 2019 proposal - Feedback request

Hi AmirAli, On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 06:17:25PM +, AmirAli Mashayekhi via macports-dev wrote: > I have uploaded my proposal draft on GSoC webpage. > > Unfortunately we at EPITA(mon École) got informed late about this > years GSoC opportunity. But this doesn’t affect my true excitement > about

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

A javascript library which you can simply call from your main.js and which will implement all the boilerplate needed to connect your vue component to the angularjs application Regards Pierre Le lun. 8 avr. 2019 à 21:23, Rajdeep Bharati a écrit : > > Hi Pierre, > > By library do you mean a librar

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

Hi Pierre, By library do you mean a library of components and JSON interfaces? Regards Rajdeep On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 12:18 AM Pierre Tardy wrote: > Hi Rajdeep, > > We already have a yeoman generator: > https://github.com/buildbot/guanlecoja/tree/master/generator-guanlecoja > > I think the cur

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

Hi Rajdeep, We already have a yeoman generator: https://github.com/buildbot/guanlecoja/tree/master/generator-guanlecoja I think the current boilerplate has more than just boilerplate. It also has some code that could be factorized. It is better not to put too much in a generator, as it is hard to

Re: GSoC 2019 [Collect build statistics]

Dear MacPorts Community, I have submitted my Final Proposal. I do understand that during these last hours it might not be possible to give feedback on the proposals. But if I am lucky enough to get more of them, I will try to get the job done (around 23 hours still remaining). Google Doc: https:/

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

@Mojca Miklavec Oh, I see. @Pierre Tardy Regarding the npm package: I think it would be better to create a project generator CLI (which would create the boilerplate project, similar to vue-cli or create-react-app). Do you think that would work? Can I use yeoman to do this? Thank you for help. R

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

Dear Rajdeep, On Sun, 7 Apr 2019 at 19:41, Rajdeep Bharati wrote: > > I found something which might help us: https://bors.tech/homu-io/ > https://github.com/barosl/homu. > I will try it set it up on my local system and get back to you. > Mojca This sounds nice, but I wonder if it would actually

Re: GSoC 2019 [Phase out dependency on Xcode]

On Sun, 7 Apr 2019 at 16:36, Satryaji Aulia wrote: > > Hi Marcus and Mojca. > > I’ve fleshed out my proposal (also my understanding of MacOS compilers) > again. To disallow Xcode compilers, I added my idea to use a compiler > blacklist which implementation already exists. I’ve also worked a lot on

Re: GSoC 2019 - Feedback request

Dear Amir, On Sun, 7 Apr 2019 at 18:21, AmirAli Mashayekhi wrote: > > Dear Mojca (and everybody else in the mail list), > > Thank you for your response, Sorry for the misundrestanding of the proposal. > > As requested I also tried to expose myself to the whole workflow of Macports > developement

Re: GSoC 2019 [Phase out dependency on Xcode]

Hi Clemens, I'd also like your feedback on my proposal, particularly about Xcode dependency. What do you think? Also thanks for the 1 hour tutorial on macports-base. It helped a lot with understanding the MacPorts system, not just me but other prospective GSOC students as I read on the mailing lis

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

I found something which might help us: https://bors.tech/homu-io/ https://github.com/barosl/homu. I will try it set it up on my local system and get back to you. Rajdeep On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 6:17 PM Rajdeep Bharati wrote: > I was attempting to package the plugin. > A possible workflow may be:

Re: GSoC 2019 - Feedback request

Dear Mojca (and everybody else in the mail list), Thank you for your response, Sorry for the misundrestanding of the proposal. As requested I also tried to expose myself to the whole workflow of Macports developement cycle. Here is a link for my pull request : https://github.com/macports/

Re: GSoC 2019 [Phase out dependency on Xcode]

Hi Marcus and Mojca.I’ve fleshed out my proposal (also my understanding of MacOS compilers)again. To disallow Xcode compilers, I added my idea to use a compilerblacklist which implementation already exists. I’ve also worked a lot on mymacports-base PR and am confident that I can comfortably code in

Re: GSoC 2019 - trace mode improvements

> > > read [1] and related thread and probably I am too late to contribute > through > GSoC. So I give up. > > > /davide > > [1] > https://lists.macports.org/pipermail/macports-dev/2019-April/040495.html Hi , https://docs.google.com/document/d/15cVbH6f6hBr9HryJEHUZEbRsToN1BAjY8My-oRstO9A/edit#he

Re: GSoC 2019 - trace mode improvements

Dear Davide, On Sun, 7 Apr 2019 at 12:55, Davide Gerhard wrote: > On Sunday, 07/04/2019 11:55 CEST, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > On Sun, 7 Apr 2019 at 09:40, Davide Gerhard wrote: > >> > >> Sorry, I am late but I saw only the other day that MacPorts > >> participate to the Google Summer of Code. > >

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

I was attempting to package the plugin. A possible workflow may be: - The user would install the package in something like a vue-cli or create-react-app. - Write the component - Pass that component to the `link` function of the plugin. - There would be options to customize the setti

Re: GSoC 2019 [Collect build statistics]

> > Hi, On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 8:58 AM Umesh Singla > wrote: > >> It’s always to good to show your work and get feedback. It’s difficult to >> comment on the quality otherwise. Please do not forget to make a PR. >> > I have submitted the PR for adding an option to portindex (which would generate

Re: GSoC 2019 - trace mode improvements

On Sunday, 07/04/2019 11:55 CEST, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > Dear Davide, > > On Sun, 7 Apr 2019 at 09:40, Davide Gerhard wrote: >> >> Seems that macports-dev@ has not received my proposal (sent yesterday); >> moreover, mailman does not answer to my command or only after some hour. > > This is str

GSoC 2019 proposal - Feedback request

Dear Macports Developers, I have uploaded my proposal draft on GSoC webpage. Unfortunately we at EPITA(mon École) got informed late about this years GSoC opportunity. But this doesn’t affect my true excitement about  participation, open source and contributing on them. I appreciate if there

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

Thanks for the feedback! On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 7:03 PM Mojca Miklavec wrote: > Dear Rajdeep, > > On Sat, 6 Apr 2019 at 13:33, Rajdeep Bharati wrote: > > > > I was wondering what kind of features you would like to have in the new > waterfall view? > > I don't remember whether I ever explicitly s

Re: GSoC 2019 - trace mode improvements

Dear Davide, On Sun, 7 Apr 2019 at 09:40, Davide Gerhard wrote: > > Seems that macports-dev@ has not received my proposal (sent yesterday); > moreover, mailman does not answer to my command or only after some hour. This is strange and might need to be put to attention of our infrastructure team.

Re: GSoC 2019 - Feedback request

Dear Amir, Nice to see you at MacPorts! You should send your email to the macports development mailing list and you would get the answer there. (I'm forwarding it to the mailing list now, but you should subscribe for the future.) On Sat, 6 Apr 2019 at 20:14, AmirAli Mashayekhi wrote: > > Dear Ma

GSoC 2019 - trace mode improvements

Sorry, I am late but I saw only the other day that MacPorts participate to the Google Summer of Code. Any comment will be appreciate. * Personal Details Name: Davide Gerhard Email: rain...@irh.it IRC: ra1nb0w at freenode Github: @ra1nb0w University: University of Trento (Italy) Location: Ital

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

Dear Rajdeep, On Sat, 6 Apr 2019 at 13:33, Rajdeep Bharati wrote: > > I was wondering what kind of features you would like to have in the new > waterfall view? I don't remember whether I ever explicitly said I wanted some new features there :) Probably the only thing I really miss is the portna

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

All right, thank you so much (sorry for the late reply). I was wondering what kind of features you would like to have in the new waterfall view? Rajdeep On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 7:46 PM Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 16:01, Pierre Tardy wrote: > > > > Not sure if this is applicabl

Re: GSoC 2019 [Collect build statistics]

On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 8:58 AM Umesh Singla wrote: > > It’s okay to share all the project related updates on the list. In fact, > it’s preferred that way. > Thanks, I was just being hesitant to write that on the list. > Does this include additions and/or deletions? > Portindex uses modified t

Re: GSoC 2019 [Collect build statistics]

On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 at 01:52, Arjun Salyan wrote: > Hi, > [sending privately to only potential mentors, because it is just an update] > It’s okay to share all the project related updates on the list. In fact, it’s preferred that way. > > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:14 AM Mojca Miklavec wrote: >

GSoC 2019

On 2 Apr 2019, at 17:11, macports-dev-requ...@lists.macports.org wrote: > GSoC 2019 Could it be possible to relocate all this topics somewhere else?

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 16:01, Pierre Tardy wrote: > > Not sure if this is applicable, but there is no import method from > buildbot 0.8.x to buildbot 0.9+ I don't believe we really need that. It would be nice to "export" all the relevant (summary) data once before decommissioning the old master (o

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

Not sure if this is applicable, but there is no import method from buildbot 0.8.x to buildbot 0.9+ Buildbot do not import previous commit as changes when starting, it only looks for new things. Pierre Le lun. 1 avr. 2019 à 23:03, Mojca Miklavec a écrit : > > On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 18:52, Rajdee

Re: GSoC 2019 [Collect build statistics]

Hi Mojca, On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:14 AM Mojca Miklavec wrote: > The drawbacks may include: > - some ports will be skipped on the builder, for various reasons (port > is known not to build on a particular builder, it may not be > distributable, ...) > - the buildbot master may be down or experie

Re: GSoC 2019 [Collect build statistics]

Dear Arjun, On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 18:38, Arjun Salyan wrote: > > Hi, > I was working on keeping the PortIndex updated, and was able to achieve this: > > Sync Portindex from > 'rsync://rsync.macports.org/macports//trunk/dports/PortIndex_darwin_16_i386/PortIndex' > Update or Add ports that were re

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 18:52, Rajdeep Bharati wrote: > > When I would be configuring the real (production) macports buildmaster, then > would the old database be used? Not if you deploy it on a fresh server, unless you explicitly put the database there (import it from elsewhere). (I don't know ho

Re: GSoC 2019 [Phase out dependency on Xcode]

Dear Satryaji, On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 21:29, Satryaji Aulia wrote: > > Hi again Mojca and Marcus. > > >> I notice how useful a "port bump" command would be if it existed. > > > > Yes, it would be. > > I've started my implementation, under macports-base/src/port1.0/portbump.tcl. Cool! > Besides th

Re: GSoC 2019 [Phase out dependency on Xcode]

Hi again Mojca and Marcus. > On 1 Apr 2019, at 17.15, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > I'm not in position to answer this, but you may check some discussion > on this mailing list (from March / GSOC) regarding trace mode, in case > it's relevant or provides you some more insight. I have read more abou

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

No, I didn't. I guess I did not have any older builds before that date (26th March). That's why the database only contains builds after that date. When I would be configuring the real (production) macports buildmaster, then would the old database be used? Rajdeep On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 9:35 PM Mo

Re: GSoC 2019 [Collect build statistics]

Hi, I was working on keeping the PortIndex updated, and was able to achieve this: - Sync Portindex from 'rsync:// rsync.macports.org/macports//trunk/dports/PortIndex_darwin_16_i386/PortIndex ' - Update or Add ports that were recently built on 10.14_x86_64 (using time frame 'last 24

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

Dear Rajdeep, On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 17:47, Rajdeep Bharati wrote: > > Yes, I think so. But I have done `buildbot restart master` several times > after that. Did you also delete the database? Merely restarting the configuration should not delete old build results. Mojca

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

Yes, I think so. But I have done `buildbot restart master` several times after that. On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 8:53 PM Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 16:37, Rajdeep Bharati wrote: > > > > I have set up a simple datepicker widget with view #1. See the demo in > the video below. > > Aw

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 16:37, Rajdeep Bharati wrote: > > I have set up a simple datepicker widget with view #1. See the demo in the > video below. Awesome, thank you! This would probably be something very useful for any project using buildbot, not just for us. > Screen Recording 2019-04-01 at 8.

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

Dear Pierre, On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 17:06, Pierre Tardy wrote: > In buildbot, there is no difference between author and commiter, we only > keep the author. > Do you think committer info is really needed? > This has nothing to do with the project proposal at hand, but yes, this would be super use

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

In buildbot, there is no difference between author and commiter, we only keep the author. Do you think committer info is really needed? Pierre Le lun. 1 avr. 2019 à 17:04, Rajdeep Bharati a écrit : > I'm using npm run watch. In the boilerplate, there is no field called > 'committer' in the ch

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

I'm using npm run watch. In the boilerplate, there is no field called 'committer' in the change: https://github.com/uglycoyote/buildbot-react-plugin-boilerplate/blob/master/src/BuildbotJsonInterfaces.ts. It only contains the author field. I also tried using the other fields, but none of them had an

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

Hi Rajdeep, Against which data are you working on? are you using gulp dev proxy or something? The committer name is normally a field in the change, but it works only if the changesource extracts the data Regards Pierre Le lun. 1 avr. 2019 à 16:37, Rajdeep Bharati a écrit : > I have set up a

Re: GSoC 2019 [Buildbot ideas]

I have set up a simple datepicker widget with view #1. See the demo in the video below. Screen Recording 2019-04-01 at 8.02.02 PM.mov However, I have some doubts/problems: - The last date is showing only till

  1   2   3   >