On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 1:38 PM Rainer Müller wrote:
>
> On 20/10/2023 15.14, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> > It happens that I'd like to "install" a variant of a self-built port
> > without actually activating it (e.g. when libraries are in use and I have
> > no immediate need to activate that diff
Well, there is no hurry here, of course. Whenever you can find some time.
Primarily I mean finding a way to force the BSD-style build, not fixing
everything through completion. (Also nothing PPC-specific is expected, that
I can hopefully sort out on my end.)
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 4:44 AM Kirill
X11 for old system is dramatically more time which I won't have for a while.
:(
--
wbr, Kirill
> On 22. Oct 2023, at 20:19, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
>
> Kirill, when you will have time for this, please also check if we can build
> this as X11-only for old systems, where native ObjC libs fail to
On Saturday October 21 2023 14:27:26 René J.V. Bertin wrote:
>Anyone feel like kicking these tyres with me? :)
Too late, but there's code to kick to see what errors I've grown!
It was an interesting little exercise, relatively easy to implement by letting
the archive unpack take place in a subp
Kirill, when you will have time for this, please also check if we can build
this as X11-only for old systems, where native ObjC libs fail to build.
I fixed the build on PPC up to AWT libs, but those are hopeless, or I got
no idea what to do to fix them anyway.
If we get rid of those, perhaps we can
On Sunday October 22 2023 19:38:46 Rainer Müller wrote:
>Yes, 'port archive' would do what you are looking for. You are correct
>this is actually missing in port(1), but please see the separate man
>page port-archive(1).
Thanks, and strange. That's exactly what I did, or thought I did (came up
em
On 20/10/2023 15.14, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> It happens that I'd like to "install" a variant of a self-built port without
> actually activating it (e.g. when libraries are in use and I have no
> immediate need to activate that different variant).
>
> Looking through the code I saw there must e
I technically can do it, but not early than November.
:(
--
wbr, Kirill
> On 22. Oct 2023, at 17:39, Nils Breunese wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The openjdk8 port in MacPorts is currently at 8u372, but two updates with
> security fixes have been released since then: 8u382 in July and 8u392 this
> m
Hello,
The openjdk8 port in MacPorts is currently at 8u372, but two updates with
security fixes have been released since then: 8u382 in July and 8u392 this
month. I don’t maintain the openjdk8 port myself, but I’ve tried bumping the
version, because this port is specified as the java.fallback d
