Well, there is no hurry here, of course. Whenever you can find some time. Primarily I mean finding a way to force the BSD-style build, not fixing everything through completion. (Also nothing PPC-specific is expected, that I can hopefully sort out on my end.)
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 4:44 AM Kirill A. Korinsky <kir...@korins.ky> wrote: > X11 for old system is dramatically more time which I won't have for a > while. > > :( > > -- > wbr, Kirill > > On 22. Oct 2023, at 20:19, Sergey Fedorov <vital....@gmail.com> wrote: > > Kirill, when you will have time for this, please also check if we can > build this as X11-only for old systems, where native ObjC libs fail to > build. > I fixed the build on PPC up to AWT libs, but those are hopeless, or I got > no idea what to do to fix them anyway. > If we get rid of those, perhaps we can have openjdk8 at least back to > 10.5, including PPC. > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 1:18 AM Kirill A. Korinsky via macports-dev < > macports-dev@lists.macports.org> wrote: > >> I technically can do it, but not early than November. >> >> :( >> >> -- >> wbr, Kirill >> >> On 22. Oct 2023, at 17:39, Nils Breunese <n...@breun.nl> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> The openjdk8 port in MacPorts is currently at 8u372, but two updates with >> security fixes have been released since then: 8u382 in July and 8u392 this >> month. I don’t maintain the openjdk8 port myself, but I’ve tried bumping >> the version, because this port is specified as the java.fallback depedency >> for a number of ports, but sadly without success. I think the patches that >> MacPorts tries to apply are no longer valid, but I don’t have an Intel >> machine and I don’t know how to make the ARM patch work. >> >> I’ve created Trac issues for updating openjdk8 in which I’ve documented >> the errors I got, but the oldest has already been open for over 3 months: >> >> * 8u382: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/67804 >> * 8u392: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/68498 >> >> Can anyone update openjdk8 to 8u392? >> >> I have updated the openjdk8-zulu and openjdk-corretto ports, which >> installed pre-built binaries from Azul and Amazon respectively, but it >> would be nice if our main built-from-source openjdk8 port was also >> up-to-date with all security fixes. >> >> Nils. >> >> >> >
