On 2019-4-6 11:01 , KARAN SHETH via macports-dev wrote:
> One issue I faced while going over the checklist for PR is:
> When I try installing upt with trace mode (-vst), it fails but other
> than that it installs properly.
> Any way to fix this issue?
>
> Error:
>
> ---> Building upt
> Executing
On 2019-4-6 12:27 , Michael Dickens wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2019, at 6:33 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> I am slightly concerned about this. The MacPorts base version is
>> available to Portfiles, and Portfiles do occasionally need to do
>> different things depending on the MacPorts base version. For
Hello,
On 2019-04-05 09:22, Renee Otten wrote:
> this looks like a very good start! There are a few things that should be
> changed and I listed them below (some of them common to all three ports):
What could be interesting here is to improve upt to make sure we never
witness these issues ever a
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019, at 6:33 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> I am slightly concerned about this. The MacPorts base version is
> available to Portfiles, and Portfiles do occasionally need to do
> different things depending on the MacPorts base version. For example,
> the behavior of *.env options was c
On 2019-04-05 17:02 EDT, MacPorts wrote:
> #58307: [port abandoned] abcde
> Maintainer has not had any activity
> [https://trac.macports.org/search?q=eclipsed.net since 2016] and had been
> assigned #56443.
>
> #48948 was also opened on their port but I think they might not have ever
> been n
Hey,
> 1) you’re missing the “license” field (you should have gotten a warning about
> this when doing “port lint —nitpick py-upt”)
> 2) the value for “homepage” seems incorrect
> 3) since upt is a tool (i.e., run on the command line and not really used as
> a library by other packages) only on
On Apr 5, 2019, at 14:30, Michael Dickens wrote:
> Thank you, Ryan, for that info. I'll have to poke at the Qt5 PortGroup more &
> see what it says about OSX 10.12 and 10.13 since that's where my current
> issues are.
>
> A quick followup from yesterday for this issue on OSX 10.13: I was sur
Hi Clemens,
I see you're getting the hang of the difficulties of the project now :)
>
That’s really encouraging for me to know that you think so ^_^
> You have the right ideas to solve the problem. Do keep in mind though
> that CAS will only work up to a word size or a double word size at most,
Thank you, Ryan, for that info. I'll have to poke at the Qt5 PortGroup more &
see what it says about OSX 10.12 and 10.13 since that's where my current issues
are.
A quick followup from yesterday for this issue on OSX 10.13: I was surprised
that "port" did indeed "update" -all- of Qt5 from 5.12
On 2019-4-6 02:05 , Aaron Madlon-Kay wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I was thinking of making a Netbeans port since recent versions aren't
> packaged nicely for Mac. The distfile is 303MB, which would make it one of
> the heaviest ports I could find (looking at `size` entries). Is this too big?
> If so, w
I wanted to take a shot at updating the Pandoc port from version 1.12 to
2.7.1, but the GHC prerequisite build fails.
:info:build deriveConstants: fd:31: hClose: invalid argument (Bad file
descriptor)
:info:build make[1]: ***
[includes/dist-derivedconstants/header/DerivedConstants.h] Error 1
Hi all.
I was thinking of making a Netbeans port since recent versions aren't packaged
nicely for Mac. The distfile is 303MB, which would make it one of the heaviest
ports I could find (looking at `size` entries). Is this too big? If so, would
it be acceptable with e.g. special license notation
hi Karan,
this looks like a very good start! There are a few things that should be
changed and I listed them below (some of them common to all three ports):
1) you’re missing the “license” field (you should have gotten a warning about
this when doing “port lint —nitpick py-upt”)
2) the value
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 2:25 PM Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 at 09:16, KARAN SHETH wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 11:59 AM Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear Karan,
> > >
> > > No time to test now, but what does "port contents py37-upt" say? It
> > > could be called upt-py37
On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 at 09:16, KARAN SHETH wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 11:59 AM Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> >
> > Dear Karan,
> >
> > No time to test now, but what does "port contents py37-upt" say? It
> > could be called upt-py37 or something. That's a weird consequence of
> > supporting multiple ve
Hey,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 11:59 AM Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
> Dear Karan,
>
> No time to test now, but what does "port contents py37-upt" say? It
> could be called upt-py37 or something. That's a weird consequence of
> supporting multiple version of python at the same time.
Port py37-upt contai
16 matches
Mail list logo
