On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 05:54:52PM -0400, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Sean Boudreau wrote:
> > They're non standard and present challenges in the portability
> department
> > so if they aren't needed the less they're referenced the better.
>
> I agree with you. We considered this point. (For example, th
Sean Boudreau wrote:
> They're non standard and present challenges in the portability department
> so if they aren't needed the less they're referenced the better.
I agree with you. We considered this point. (For example, there is a way
to implement the 'close-stream' module with fpending and one
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 06:51:04PM -0400, Eric Blake wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> According to Sean Boudreau on 9/30/2007 4:10 PM:
> > Hello:
>
> Hello Sean, and adding bug-gnulib,
>
> >
> > Would it be possible to not bring in freading.c and fpurge.c
> > and to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Sean Boudreau on 9/30/2007 4:10 PM:
> Hello:
Hello Sean, and adding bug-gnulib,
>
> Would it be possible to not bring in freading.c and fpurge.c
> and to disable the associated tests if fflush() behaves as
> you expect?
For m4 1.4.x: I
Hello:
Would it be possible to not bring in freading.c and fpurge.c
and to disable the associated tests if fflush() behaves as
you expect?
Thanks,
Sean Boudreau
___
M4-discuss mailing list
M4-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/m4-