Sean Boudreau wrote: > They're non standard and present challenges in the portability department > so if they aren't needed the less they're referenced the better.
I agree with you. We considered this point. (For example, there is a way to implement the 'close-stream' module with fpending and one without.) But in the case of fflush & fseek, these additional low-level functions appear to be really needed. Bruno _______________________________________________ M4-discuss mailing list M4-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/m4-discuss
