Re: What is IMHO much better in 1.1.6 fix 4 than in 1.2.0

2002-06-21 Thread Ling Li
LyX 1.2.0 can not work with floats (figure or table, ...) included in a paragraph with \emph on. For example, it will translate into LaTeX code like: \emph{ \begin{table} ...\end{table} ...} which can not compile. While in LyX 1.1.6fix4, LyX will correctly shift the mode: \emph{

Re: why does it need libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3

2002-06-21 Thread Ling Li
In one computer with RH 7.2, I used the rpm package for RH 7.3 together with xforms-0.89, i.e., rpm -U xforms-0.89-1.i386.rpm lyx-1.2.0-1rh73-xforms089.i386.rpm and it works. On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Matt Brennan wrote: > > Addelkader, > > I had a similar porblem. I just created a soft link which

Re: What is IMHO much better in 1.1.6 fix 4 than in 1.2.0

2002-06-22 Thread Ling Li
> why should this not compile?? > > \documentclass{article} > \begin{document} > \emph{ blah % > \begin{table}% > \begin{tabular}{|c|}\hline blah\\\hline\end{tabular}% > \end{table}% > } > \end{document} If you include caption in your table, you will find the bug. Step

\langle and

2002-06-22 Thread Ling Li
Here is another small difference in TeX code exporting between LyX 1.1.6fix4 and 1.2.0: create a math in LyX: \left< a+b \right> and then compile it. Both versions work OK. Then save the file. Reopen it. Both versions complain "Deco was not found..." However, if you compile it,

Re: \langle and

2002-06-23 Thread Ling Li
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002, Dekel Tsur wrote: > > The exported TeX code looks like > >$\left\< a+b\right\> $ > > > > Though we can use \langle and \rangle to work around this problem, it > > would be more convenient if < and > work. > > Perhaps the fastest way to insert \left<\right> is to type M-m <