On 10.09.2017 07:49, racoon wrote:
On 09.09.2017 15:32, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
You have to change it in order to use the native support. But you still
should be able to continue with the workaround.
Maybe it would be nice to have a guide how to get from [1] to native
support at [1]. Is the
Am Sonntag, den 10.09.2017, 07:49 +0200 schrieb racoon:
> On 09.09.2017 15:32, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Am Samstag, den 09.09.2017, 11:31 +0200 schrieb racoon:
> > > I have a document that works fine in 2.2 but generates an error
> > > in
> > > 2.3
> > >
> > > "I found no \citation commands--
Am Sonntag, den 10.09.2017, 09:53 +0200 schrieb racoon:
> On 10.09.2017 07:49, racoon wrote:
> > On 09.09.2017 15:32, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > > You have to change it in order to use the native support. But you
> > > still
> > > should be able to continue with the workaround.
> >
> > Maybe it
On 10.09.2017 10:12, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 10.09.2017, 07:49 +0200 schrieb racoon:
On 09.09.2017 15:32, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Samstag, den 09.09.2017, 11:31 +0200 schrieb racoon:
I have a document that works fine in 2.2 but generates an error
in
2.3
"I found no \cit
Am Sonntag, den 10.09.2017, 10:36 +0200 schrieb racoon:
> By the way the usage of upper case is inconsistent. Either the T
> should
> be lower or the l and x upper case. There is no upper case usage in
> Document Settings > Bibliography for Biblatex but for BibTeX...
Thats's because Biblatex is
Am Sonntag, den 10.09.2017, 10:36 +0200 schrieb racoon:
> I noticed that the BibTex Bibliography dialog's Content field is
> blank
> by default. Either this represents some "not set" value but then
> this
> should be explicit and an option in the drop down menu, or "all
> cited
> references" sho
On 10.09.2017 10:12, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Yes, it would be nice to document issues there. Note that the
workaround was never officially supported, so the transition might
entails some caveats (although not too much hopefully).
I added what I did for the transition:
http://wiki.lyx.org/Bib
Am Sonntag, den 10.09.2017, 11:14 +0200 schrieb racoon:
> On 10.09.2017 10:12, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Yes, it would be nice to document issues there. Note that the
> > workaround was never officially supported, so the transition might
> > entails some caveats (although not too much hopefully
To my experience, Lyx generates now this error when you have inserted a
bibliography in the document but you do not have any citation in the document.
This check is a good idea, but it should generate a warning instead of an error
IMHO.
Murat
Le 10 sept. 2017 à 07:47 +0200, racoon , a écrit :
>
Am Sonntag, den 10.09.2017, 13:54 +0200 schrieb Murat Yildizoglu:
> To my experience, Lyx generates now this error when you have inserted
> a bibliography in the document but you do not have any citation in
> the document. This check is a good idea, but it should generate a
> warning instead of an
On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 06:00:39PM +0200, jezZiFeR wrote:
> Dear Rich, dear all,
>
> meanwhile I startet trying to use the KOMA-script article class. For me it is
> not that easy to search for the proper places in the documentation because it
> exists only in English and is very long. I would li
On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 06:24:40AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2017-09-06, Richard Heck wrote:
> > On 09/06/2017 02:08 AM, Anders Ekberg wrote:
>
> >> Tested briefly on Mac latest OS and fresh TeX installation. Only
> >> problem was that the welcome document complains about unknown image
> >>
12 matches
Mail list logo
