Thanks for that.
Rod
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 02:35:29PM +0800, Rod Pinna wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm not sure if this is a good idea but...
> >
> > I'm following a method from an article, but with some different starting
> > assumptions. What I'm co
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 02:35:29PM +0800, Rod Pinna wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm not sure if this is a good idea but...
>
> I'm following a method from an article, but with some different starting
> assumptions. What I'm considering is numbering my equaitons, but also
> trying to have the number from
Hi all,
I'm not sure if this is a good idea but...
I'm following a method from an article, but with some different starting
assumptions. What I'm considering is numbering my equaitons, but also
trying to have the number from the original article; e.g.
e=mc^2 (1, A3a)
Where 1 is my number, and
