Re: lyx server (not serverpipe)

2003-12-16 Thread Angus Leeming
stuart macgregor wrote: >> lyx 1.4.x has per-process sockets and a helper routine 'lyxclient' >> to make interaction with the expected instance simple. The eventual >> idea is to get rid of the pipes entirely as they're unix-specific. > > I would like to add a link between noweb document scrap pa

Re: lyx server (not serverpipe)

2003-12-16 Thread stuart macgregor
> lyx 1.4.x has per-process sockets and a helper routine 'lyxclient' to > make interaction with the expected instance simple. The eventual idea > is to get rid of the pipes entirely as they're unix-specific. I would like to add a link between noweb document scrap paragraphs and gvim, to allow gvi

Re: lyx server (not serverpipe)

2003-12-15 Thread Angus Leeming
christoff pale wrote: > Hi, > In emacs, one can start a emacs-server and then > I can do emacsclient file.xyz and it will open this in > the existing process. > I use lyxpipe a lot, and when I have multiple lyx > sessions, this lyxpipe gets corrupted. > > Is it possible to add this feature in lyx

lyx server (not serverpipe)

2003-12-15 Thread christoff pale
Hi, In emacs, one can start a emacs-server and then I can do emacsclient file.xyz and it will open this in the existing process. I use lyxpipe a lot, and when I have multiple lyx sessions, this lyxpipe gets corrupted. Is it possible to add this feature in lyx? However, I would prefer xemacs style

Re: serverpipe

2000-08-29 Thread Lior Silberman
On 29 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Lior Silberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On 28 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bj=F8nnes wrote: > |=20 > | > How should we handle two running LyX processes? > | > Which one should use/delete the lyxpipe? > | > (we could use a lock file that containes th

Re: serverpipe

2000-08-29 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Lior Silberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 28 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | > How should we handle two running LyX processes? | > Which one should use/delete the lyxpipe? | > (we could use a lock file that containes the pid of the "master" lyx, | > only this pid should be allowed

Re: serverpipe

2000-08-28 Thread Lior Silberman
On 28 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > How should we handle two running LyX processes? > Which one should use/delete the lyxpipe? > (we could use a lock file that containes the pid of the "master" lyx, > only this pid should be allowed to changed files in the .lyx dir) > > When we get mult

Re: serverpipe

2000-08-28 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | hi, | | the two files | | ~/.lyx/lyxpipe.in | ~/.lyx/lyxpipe.out | | are not deleted when lyx is closed. starting lyx again gives | | LyXComm: Pipe /home/voss/.lyx/lyxpipe.in already exists. | If no other LyX program is active, please delete the pip

Re: serverpipe

2000-08-26 Thread German Poo Caaman~o
Herbert Voss wrote: > LyXComm: Pipe /home/voss/.lyx/lyxpipe.in already exists. > If no other LyX program is active, please delete the pipe by hand and > try again. > > importing/exporting my citations with pybliographic to lyx > sometimes doesn't work in fact of this situation. > it may be a good

serverpipe

2000-08-26 Thread Herbert Voss
hi, the two files ~/.lyx/lyxpipe.in ~/.lyx/lyxpipe.out are not deleted when lyx is closed. starting lyx again gives LyXComm: Pipe /home/voss/.lyx/lyxpipe.in already exists. If no other LyX program is active, please delete the pipe by hand and try again. importing/exporting my citations with