RPMS for xforms 88.1, which I used to build lyx on RH7, can be obtained
in the redhat contrib directory. There's a fill mirror at
ftp://ftp.varesearch.com. go to /pub/mirrors/redhat/contrib/i386 for
xforms and xforms-devel. DOn't forget you need the newest RedHat
updates for glibc and gcc to ma
> 1. make sure /etc/ld.so.conf lists non-standard¹ directories that those
> libraries may be in and then run ldconfig (you'll need to root to do this)
> ¹ anything other than /lib and /usr/lib
>
> 2. It'd be nice to know why c++ is being tried instead of g++. I'm sure
> g++ is supposed to
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, astrid wrote:
> Allan Rae wrote:
> >
>
> >
> > Hmmm... at this point it may simply be better to take a look at the
> > config.log file (I think your original message said it was the
> > sigc++/configure that failed so look at sigc++/config.log) and search so
> > "error" or "E
Allan Rae wrote:
>
>
> Hmmm... at this point it may simply be better to take a look at the
> config.log file (I think your original message said it was the
> sigc++/configure that failed so look at sigc++/config.log) and search so
> "error" or "Error" in the file then send the surrounding lines
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, astrid wrote:
>
> >
> > So you have the libraries and will be able to run already-compiled code. To
> > compile your own, however, you'll need the associated header files. Here's
> > the contents of my g++ header file dir. You'll need to find/install the
> > equivalent for yo
>
> So you have the libraries and will be able to run already-compiled code. To
> compile your own, however, you'll need the associated header files. Here's
> the contents of my g++ header file dir. You'll need to find/install the
> equivalent for your flavour of g++.
>
> Angus
>
> aleem@pneum
> I found:
> /usr/lib/
> libstdc++.so.2.7.2
[snip]
So you have the libraries and will be able to run already-compiled code. To
compile your own, however, you'll need the associated header files. Here's
the contents of my g++ header file dir. You'll need to find/install the
equivalent fo
Allan Rae wrote:
>
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, astrid wrote:
>
> > > Note that you can test the program without 'installing' it. Configure
> > > --with-lyxname (again to preserve ~/.lyx), and compile with just 'make'
> > > (and not 'make install' if you've been using that). Then you can run the
> > >
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, astrid wrote:
> > Note that you can test the program without 'installing' it. Configure
> > --with-lyxname (again to preserve ~/.lyx), and compile with just 'make'
> > (and not 'make install' if you've been using that). Then you can run the
> > exectuable from [wherever the s
> Note that you can test the program without 'installing' it. Configure
> --with-lyxname (again to preserve ~/.lyx), and compile with just 'make'
> (and not 'make install' if you've been using that). Then you can run the
> exectuable from [wherever the sources are]/src/lyx
Hello,
I did try this
Chris,
The way to do this is to recompile the new lyx under a different name.
Get the sources (lyx-1.1.6pre3.tar.gz), untar them.
There are two configure switches that help you.
One is --with-lyxname, which sets the name for various directories and
files (but not the main executable) to somethi
> "Svante" == Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Svante> Jean-Marc, Sorry I did not dig deep enough into the web pages.
Svante> I was only looking to the lyx http://www.lyx.org/ and
Svante> lyx-devel http://www.devel.lyx.org/ pages and did not find a
Svante> link to the archives there
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dekel> This is a known bug in 1.1.6pre3: the list of layouts is not
Dekel> updated after changing the document class (you need to close
Dekel> the file and reopen it to get the correct list.)
It is in fact worse than that: the environments
Jean-Marc,
Sorry I did not dig deep enough into the web pages. I was only looking
to the lyx http://www.lyx.org/ and lyx-devel http://www.devel.lyx.org/
pages and did not find a link to the archives there. Did not expect to
find it at the internet resources page. Also I found no link from the
dev
L PROTECTED]>, LyX users
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: re 1.1.6pre3
>Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 20:39:36 +0200
>
>On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 11:01:26AM +, John O'Gorman wrote:
> > Question: I tried the Noweb article.
> > Problem 1: import of the exampl
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 11:01:26AM +, John O'Gorman wrote:
> Question: I tried the Noweb article.
> Problem 1: import of the examples in /usr/doc failed with a reLyX
> error: didn't find \begin{document} cammand
The examples you have may be partial files, i.e. no \begin{document} ..
\end{do
Complaint: The damned platypus is still wrong!
You have copy to platypus.eps from clipart to doc under the
/usr/share/lyx directory to view the UserGuide properly.
Question: I tried the Docbook ducument layout. I hate the sans-serif
fonts it produces. Does anyone know how to change this. (I expec
> "Svante" == Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Svante> What do you think about having links to the mail archives at
Svante> the LyX web pages, not only to the mailing addresses
Svante> [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
Did you really read the page
http://www.lyx.org/internet/mailing.php3
?
It
Allan Rae writes:
> On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Svante Signell wrote:
>
> > BTW: Are the lyx lists archived somewhere? A lot of problems
> > can be solved by referring to older postings. There was a lot of
> > disussion recently about the X11 header file defining Object.
>
> http://www.mail-archi
See below.
Lars Gullik Bjønnes writes:
> Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Lars Gullik Bjønnes writes:
> | > Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | >
> | > | Even though LyX now compiles, I have problems with LyX dumping core at
> | > | start up. Lars, has this
Norm Matloff wrote:
> For those of us who are not skilled at installing gcc, could you tell us
> the easiest way to install 2.95, without running into unforeseen
> problems with libraries, paths, etc? Should we download an RPM?
What we (that is, the system manager) did was simply remove the
Allan is correct.
Stay the hell away from the xform RPM in RH's powertools directory.
Compiling Lyx against that (xform-0.88-15) will bomb! Refer to my
previous email.
What I did was to build my own RPM for 0.89. Here is the .spec file for
your enjoyment...
For the RH newbies:
1. Copy xforms.spe
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Svante Signell wrote:
>
> Sorry, my replies should also go to the users list. Damned mailer.
>
> The xforms version in rawhide/powertools directory is still 0.88-15, where
> the following change has to be made to forms.h: Comment out
> .
>
> Even though LyX now compiles, I hav
Sorry, my replies should also go to the users list. Damned mailer.
The xforms version in rawhide/powertools directory is still 0.88-15, where
the following change has to be made to forms.h: Comment out
.
Even though LyX now compiles, I have problems with LyX dumping core at
start up. Lars, has
Sorry, my replies should also go to the users list. Damned mailer.
Lars Gullik Bjønnes writes:
> Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Even though LyX now compiles, I have problems with LyX dumping core at
> | start up. Lars, has this been solved recently?
>
> And you are sur
"Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote:
>
> FUD, gcc-2.96 works just perfect.
>
Lars, you're absolutely right. gcc-2.96 are so much better in compiling
C++ stuff (although the one shipped with RH7 is pretty crappy, which I
believed was 2.96-54).
>
> Your XForms dist is too old. Get a newer one.
> (but
Why not try the new update to RH7.0 gcc-2.96-69?
For those of us who are not skilled at installing gcc, could you tell us
the easiest way to install 2.95, without running into unforeseen
problems with libraries, paths, etc? Should we download an RPM?
Norm Matloff
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 11:39:19AM +0200, Andre Juffer wrote:
>
>
> Wai-Sun Ch
Andre Juffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Wai-Sun Chia wrote:
|
| > Hello,
| > Just downloaded the latest lyx-1.1.6pre3 and tried to compile it on my
| > RH7 system. This is updated frequently from Rawhide. Specifically this
| > system is running:
| > gcc-2.96-69
| > glibc-2.2-9
| > binutils-2.
Wai-Sun Chia wrote:
> Hello,
> Just downloaded the latest lyx-1.1.6pre3 and tried to compile it on my
> RH7 system. This is updated frequently from Rawhide. Specifically this
> system is running:
>
> gcc-2.96-69
> glibc-2.2-9
> binutils-2.10.1.0.2-1
> libsigc++-1.0.1-1
gcc-2.96 is a develop
30 matches
Mail list logo
