Re: math bold revisited

2012-09-27 Thread Paul A . Rubin
David L. Johnson Lehigh.EDU> writes: > > On 09/23/2012 08:03 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote: > > Have a look at > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!msg/comp.text.tex/ > > c8B-57irOaY/ecy76Jcr9LgJ > > > That link didn't work, GMANE's ultra-anal web interface (which absolutely will not

Re: math bold revisited

2012-09-23 Thread David L. Johnson
On 09/23/2012 08:03 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Have a look at https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!msg/comp.text.tex/ c8B-57irOaY/ecy76Jcr9LgJ There was a bug in MiKTeX involving broken font packages. I would have thought it fixed by now, but perhaps not. The answer back then seemed to b

Re: math bold revisited

2012-09-23 Thread Paul A . Rubin
Have a look at https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!msg/comp.text.tex/ c8B-57irOaY/ecy76Jcr9LgJ There was a bug in MiKTeX involving broken font packages. I would have thought it fixed by now, but perhaps not. The answer back then seemed to be to install the symbol package (or maybe, if

Re: math bold revisited

2012-09-21 Thread Brendan Godfrey
Paul A. Rubin msu.edu> writes: > > When you say you ran "update", does that mean (or include) "update formats"? > I've been off Windows for a while, but it seems to me that I had font problems > once or twice that required me to run MiKTeX's Options app and do both a refresh > of the database

Re: math bold revisited

2012-09-20 Thread Paul A . Rubin
When you say you ran "update", does that mean (or include) "update formats"? I've been off Windows for a while, but it seems to me that I had font problems once or twice that required me to run MiKTeX's Options app and do both a refresh of the database (FNDB) and an update to the formats. Paul

Re: math bold revisited

2012-09-20 Thread Brendan Godfrey
I am a new LyX user, trying to view in pdf format a short file give to me by a colleague. I receive the same error shown above, namely (from LaTeX Log): ) ("C:\Program Files\MiKTeX 2.9\tex\latex\psnfss\pifont.sty" Package: pifont 2005/04/12 PSNFSS-v9.2a Pi font support (SPQR) LaTeX Font Info:

Re: math bold revisited

2010-09-14 Thread Jack Tanner
Uwe Stöhr web.de> writes: > "To make a complete formula bold, the command \mathbf from the previous subsection cannot be used, > because it doesn't work for small Greek letters. Furthermore it prints Latin letters always upright" Whoops. I must've stopped reading that sentence when I got to the

Re: math bold revisited

2010-09-14 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 15.09.2010 04:01, schrieb Jack Tanner: The Math manual does render both \mathbf and \boldsymbol correctly, both in live preview and in PDF. However, in my own document (with all default document properties) \boldsymbol works but \mathbf doesn't work in either live preview or PDF. Then your

Re: math bold revisited

2010-09-14 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 15.09.2010 04:01, schrieb Jack Tanner: The Math manual does render both \mathbf and \boldsymbol correctly, both in live preview and in PDF. However, in my own document (with all default document properties) \boldsymbol works but \mathbf doesn't work in either live preview or PDF. Then your

Re: math bold revisited

2010-09-14 Thread Jack Tanner
Uwe Stöhr web.de> writes: > > Am 14.09.2010 23:35, schrieb Jack Tanner: > > > The Math manual does render both \mathbf and > > \boldsymbol correctly, both in live preview and in PDF. However, in my own > > document (with all default document properties) \boldsymbol works but > > \mathbf > > do

Re: math bold revisited

2010-09-14 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 14.09.2010 23:35, schrieb Jack Tanner: The Math manual does render both \mathbf and \boldsymbol correctly, both in live preview and in PDF. However, in my own document (with all default document properties) \boldsymbol works but \mathbf doesn't work in either live preview or PDF. Then your

Re: math bold revisited

2010-09-14 Thread Jack Tanner
Actually, no, problem still there. The Math manual does render both \mathbf and \boldsymbol correctly, both in live preview and in PDF. However, in my own document (with all default document properties) \boldsymbol works but \mathbf doesn't work in either live preview or PDF.

Re: math bold revisited

2010-09-14 Thread Jack Tanner
Uwe Stöhr web.de> writes: > In this case the package "pifont" is not installed. To install all > packages used by LyX, log in as admin, open an Internet connection and > reconfigure LyX (via the Tools menu). > Afterwards, restart LyX and view the EmbeddedObjects manual as PDF - > this should t

Re: math bold revisited

2010-09-14 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 14.09.2010 20:14, schrieb Jack Tanner: Thanks for suggesting the EmbeddedObjects manual as a test. The version of that manual that comes with 1.6.7 doesn't have the section 11.2 Bold Formulas. Sorry, I meant the math manual. When I try to render to PDF, I get two errors (below). Perhaps I

Re: math bold revisited

2010-09-14 Thread Paul Rubin
Jack Tanner hotmail.com> writes: > > I'm using 1.6.7 on Windows. With MiKTeX? Make sure you have the pifont and caption packages installed in MiKTeX. (You can use the MiKTeX package manager to check and, if necessary, download and install them.) /Paul

Re: math bold revisited

2010-09-14 Thread Jack Tanner
Uwe Stöhr web.de> writes: > > Am 14.09.2010 17:50, schrieb Jack Tanner: > > > Just tried using \mathbf (with all default document properties), and bold > > doesn't show up either in live preview or in PDF output. > > What is your LyX version? Do you see bold equations, sec. 11.2 "Bold > Formu

Re: math bold revisited

2010-09-14 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 14.09.2010 17:50, schrieb Jack Tanner: Just tried using \mathbf (with all default document properties), and bold doesn't show up either in live preview or in PDF output. What is your LyX version? Do you see bold equations, sec. 11.2 "Bold Formulas" of LyX's EmbeddedObjects manual that you