Re: Table in SGML LinuxDoc article

2005-06-29 Thread Jose' Matos
On Wednesday 22 June 2005 21:57, Guillaume Marcais wrote: > When I insert a table in LinuxDoc, it creates what looks like a text > table (with + and |). But it seems to forget to add the right . So > instead of the expected: It was not evident to me what is the version of linu

Table in SGML LinuxDoc article

2005-06-22 Thread Guillaume Marcais
When I insert a table in LinuxDoc, it creates what looks like a text table (with + and |). But it seems to forget to add the right . So instead of the expected: +---+---+ | cell1 | cell2 | +---+---+ I get the unsightly: +---+---+| cell1 | cell2 |+---+---+ Is it

Re: Problems in Using - SGML ( LinuxDoc manpage) Document Style

2004-09-29 Thread udayan singh
Thanks, for your views, cleared up a lot of stuff. Will post any updates if I get. Regards, Udayan From: José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Problems in Using - SGML ( LinuxDoc manpage) Document Style Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:28:50 +0100

Re: Problems in Using - SGML ( LinuxDoc manpage) Document Style

2004-09-29 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 12:26:46PM +, udayan singh wrote: > > > > > Because then you are using different tools. > > If using linxudoc manpage the path to pdf is: > >lyx -> linuxdoc -> latex -> pdf > > > > while with "LaTeX (book)"

Re: Problems in Using - SGML ( LinuxDoc manpage) Document Style

2004-09-29 Thread udayan singh
> > Well I think if its playing some role in formatting ( or some other thing ) > of this doc class, then it should have been mentioned ( my views) . I agree. But my priority is not linuxdoc, linuxdoc is a dead end. It works well for simple things. The problem was that it started

Re: Problems in Using - SGML ( LinuxDoc manpage) Document Style

2004-09-29 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 06:42:29AM +, udayan singh wrote: > Would you like me to put the file here, that I got in .sgml format? Its the > example linuxdoc_manpage.sgml that we get from the linuxdoc_manpage.lyx, > which comes with lyx. No need to, at least for now. > Regards, > Udayan -

Re: Problems in Using - SGML ( LinuxDoc manpage) Document Style

2004-09-29 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 06:33:00AM +, udayan singh wrote: > > Well I think if its playing some role in formatting ( or some other thing ) > of this doc class, then it should have been mentioned ( my views) . I agree. But my priority is not linuxdoc, linuxdoc is a dead end. It w

Re: Problems in Using - SGML ( LinuxDoc manpage) Document Style

2004-09-28 Thread udayan singh
Would you like me to put the file here, that I got in .sgml format? Its the example linuxdoc_manpage.sgml that we get from the linuxdoc_manpage.lyx, which comes with lyx. Regards, Udayan _ Life on the fast tracks! http://server1.msn

Re: Problems in Using - SGML ( LinuxDoc manpage) Document Style

2004-09-28 Thread udayan singh
> >> Hi , > >> > >> I am using lyx with the document class ? ?SGML (LinuxDoc manpage)?. Now > >I > >> really tried to find some docs related to this class specifically, but > >> couldn?t find anything really specific to it. I am facing some p

Re: Problems in Using - SGML ( LinuxDoc manpage) Document Style

2004-09-28 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 07:08:58AM +, udayan singh wrote: > >> Hi , > >> > >> I am using lyx with the document class ? ?SGML (LinuxDoc manpage)?. Now > >I > >> really tried to find some docs related to this class specifically, but > >> couldn

Re: Problems in Using - SGML ( LinuxDoc manpage) Document Style

2004-09-28 Thread udayan singh
> Hi , > > I am using lyx with the document class ? ?SGML (LinuxDoc manpage)?. Now I > really tried to find some docs related to this class specifically, but > couldn?t find anything really specific to it. I am facing some probs in > documenting using the above-mentioned c

Re: linuxdoc

2003-11-17 Thread Jose' Matos
On Friday 14 November 2003 00:42, John O'Gorman wrote: > > I will try the same things on a Redhat 9 system. (Most things I try on > SuSE seem to go wrong!). Ok. > On the topic of linuxdoc Jose', I am considering doing the documentation > for the Aubit4GL project. The

Re: linuxdoc

2003-11-14 Thread John O'Gorman
Jose' Matos wrote: That is weird and those problems should be related. The linuxdoc tools chain uses latex to make a dvi, so something is going wrong in that department. I will try the same things on a Redhat 9 system. (Most things I try on SuSE seem to go wrong!). On the top

Re: linuxdoc

2003-11-14 Thread Jose' Matos
On Thursday 13 November 2003 04:42, John O'Gorman wrote: > Trying the article(linuxdoc) option, I get 2 distinct problems. Before > delving deeper into them can anyone offer suggestions. > > 1. Runs OK as root but will not produce a .dvi file as a normal user. > The problem

linuxdoc

2003-11-13 Thread John O'Gorman
Trying the article(linuxdoc) option, I get 2 distinct problems. Before delving deeper into them can anyone offer suggestions. 1. Runs OK as root but will not produce a .dvi file as a normal user. The problem seems to be missing .pk files. Presumably a permission problem or something wrong

Re: SGML (LinuxDoc article) class

2003-02-06 Thread José Matos
On Thursday 06 February 2003 19:03, Adinda Praditya wrote: > > So Is it true that SGML (LinuxDoc article) class doesn't allow us to insert > image? If it is, how come? I never saw any example of linuxdoc that presented an image. That was the reason why it never got implemented.

SGML (LinuxDoc article) class

2003-02-05 Thread Adinda Praditya
I changed my class after i installed linuxdoc-tools-0.9.20-4mdk as discussed earlier. When i viewed both with DVI and HTML, the image didn't show up. I checked by creating an empty file using article class, inserting a small image. I can view the image with DVI. But after i changed the

Re: Newbie: linuxdoc and forced page breaks - SOLVED

2003-01-23 Thread Richard Huxton
On Wednesday 22 Jan 2003 7:26 pm, José Matos wrote: > The information you are looking for is in > /usr/share/linuxdoc-tools/dist/linuxdoc-tools/latex2e/mapping > > there you should modify > + "\n\\section" > > to > + "\n\\

Re: Newbie: linuxdoc and forced page breaks

2003-01-22 Thread José Matos
they're > just being escaped on the way. Got a work-around for the moment anyway. The information you are looking for is in /usr/share/linuxdoc-tools/dist/linuxdoc-tools/latex2e/mapping there you should modify + "\n\\section" to + "\n\\p

Re: Newbie: linuxdoc and forced page breaks

2003-01-22 Thread Richard Huxton
On Wednesday 22 Jan 2003 4:53 pm, José Matos wrote: > On Wednesday 22 January 2003 12:24, Richard Huxton wrote: > > I'm putting together about a 20-page help doc for pdf and html output > > using the linuxdoc (article) template. > > Good. :-) > > > I like the

Re: Newbie: linuxdoc and forced page breaks

2003-01-22 Thread José Matos
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 12:24, Richard Huxton wrote: > I'm putting together about a 20-page help doc for pdf and html output using > the linuxdoc (article) template. Good. :-) > I like the linuxdoc pdflatex output (bookmarks, links, standard fonts etc) > but can't

Re: Newbie: linuxdoc and forced page breaks

2003-01-22 Thread Richard Huxton
On Wednesday 22 Jan 2003 2:02 pm, Helge Hafting wrote: > Richard Huxton wrote: > > I'm putting together about a 20-page help doc for pdf and html output > > using the linuxdoc (article) template. > > > > I like the linuxdoc pdflatex output (bookmarks, links, standar

Newbie: linuxdoc and forced page breaks

2003-01-22 Thread Richard Huxton
I'm putting together about a 20-page help doc for pdf and html output using the linuxdoc (article) template. I like the linuxdoc pdflatex output (bookmarks, links, standard fonts etc) but can't force a page break at the start of a new section. I've tried the Layout | Paragr

problem with perl scripting when exporting to linuxdoc and text format

2003-01-10 Thread Etienne Herlent
I use the following statement for exporting to linuxdoc: ($status, $data) = $lyx->command("buffer-export linuxdoc","[M-f E x]"); An alert says : No information for exporting to linuxdoc and debuging info (with -dbg 8192 option) tells me : LyXComm: No such file or directo

Re: conversion to linuxdoc

2002-07-22 Thread thomas schönhoff
José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote: > On Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 03:44:22PM +0200, thomas schönhoff wrote: > >>Hello, >> >>this is related to LyX-1.2.0 . >>I just wanted to start creating a file and convert this to >>Linuxdoc-format as described in help docs. >

Re: conversion to linuxdoc

2002-07-22 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 03:44:22PM +0200, thomas schönhoff wrote: > Hello, > > this is related to LyX-1.2.0 . > I just wanted to start creating a file and convert this to > Linuxdoc-format as described in help docs. > So I unsuccessfully browsed Herbert's website and fi

LinuxDoc/DocBook for CJK-LYX

2002-02-19 Thread Niklaus Giger
I successfully installed (with some tricks) CJK-LYX on my Debian GNU/Linux system. I just wanted to use the DocBook or LinuxDoc document class to write a small users guide for ami. But both classes do not render correctly the korean characters. The article class is okay. Does anybody have a

Re: Basic Questions - linuxdoc-sgml.sty

2002-01-22 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Monday 21 January 2002 21:22, Herbert Voss wrote: > > On RHL7.2, I assume that this change is to be made to > > /usr/lib/sgml-tools/linuxdoc-sgml.sty ... ? Yes it is there where it should be changed, and not on preamble. In the preamble only goes linuxdoc specific stuff.

Re: Basic Questions - linuxdoc-sgml.sty

2002-01-21 Thread Herbert Voss
, but as I said, I'm a newbie. > > On RHL7.2, I assume that this change is to be made to > /usr/lib/sgml-tools/linuxdoc-sgml.sty ... ? I never used this style, so I can't say any more at this time. will have a look tomorrow. Maybe that others can help. > Hm ... most of the

Re: Tables disappear in LinuxDoc

2002-01-08 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 13:03, Yannick Patois wrote: > On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Peter J. Braam wrote: > > The table doesn't make it into the SGML export. Is there a workaround > > for that? > > I have been told that support for tables in linuxdoc had never been > i

Re: Tables disappear in LinuxDoc

2002-01-08 Thread Yannick Patois
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Peter J. Braam wrote: > The table doesn't make it into the SGML export. Is there a workaround > for that? I have been told that support for tables in linuxdoc had never been implemented in Lyx. For this, you'r on your own. Maybe some wise cut&pastle fr

Re: Tables disappear in LinuxDoc

2002-01-03 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Sunday 30 December 2001 20:08, Peter J. Braam wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to get a table into a LinuxDoc document (version 1.1.6 > Mandrake 8mk). > The table doesn't make it into the SGML export. Is there a workaround > for that? Not for 1.1.6. For 1.2.0 it w

Tables disappear in LinuxDoc

2001-12-30 Thread Peter J. Braam
Hi, I'm trying to get a table into a LinuxDoc document (version 1.1.6 Mandrake 8mk). The table doesn't make it into the SGML export. Is there a workaround for that? Thanks!

Re: Lyx and LinuxDoc

2001-10-31 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
> That's what I hope. Will also Lyx be ble to configure it's visual > représentation and menues items according to such a description file ? Yes. If I remember correctly can already do that for menus. I think that this is true also for 1.1.6. > > If you have any

Re: Lyx and LinuxDoc

2001-10-30 Thread Yannick Patois
you notice carefully this is the same both for > latex, linuxdoc and docbook. He have discussed this last year in > Norway, and Lars suggested powerful scheme for lists (enumerate, > itemize, description, etc) that is becoming easier to implement after > all the code cleanup that we h

Re: Lyx and LinuxDoc

2001-10-30 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
I went to the Lyx > code): What were your problems? > I found that the DTD was somehow hardwired in C++ code. I dont know much > about sgml, but couldnt it be done more easily by a generic sgml/xml > engine that could parse the LinuxDoc/DocBook DTD and match it against Lyx > for

Re: Lyx and LinuxDoc

2001-10-26 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 03:15:46PM +0200, Yannick Patois wrote: > Hi, > > I've already spoke about this question before, that is, the use of > LinuxDoc in Lyx. > > The question is that LinuxDoc is so simplier to use than DocBook (by hand) > that this format h

Lyx and LinuxDoc

2001-10-26 Thread Yannick Patois
Hi, I've already spoke about this question before, that is, the use of LinuxDoc in Lyx. The question is that LinuxDoc is so simplier to use than DocBook (by hand) that this format has been chosen for editing documentation, but me and some other would like to use Lyx. So my question is s

Re: LinuxDoc : table not rendered (in english ;)

2001-09-20 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 06:35:09PM +0200, Yannick Patois wrote: > Heloo again, > > On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: > > > I am trying to deal with socks 5 and ssh... but I already answered > > previous message. :-) > > (what's socks 5 ?) That's a type of firewall. I d

Re: LinuxDoc : table not rendered (in english ;)

2001-09-20 Thread Yannick Patois
Heloo again, On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: > I am trying to deal with socks 5 and ssh... but I already answered > previous message. :-) (what's socks 5 ?) > They do. See my last message. [...] > There are plans for that. We need to define the path to follow, one

Re: LinuxDoc : table not rendered (in english ;)

2001-09-20 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 05:21:26PM +0200, Yannick Patois wrote: > Hi, > > Once again, I reply to myself ;) I am trying to deal with socks 5 and ssh... but I already answered previous message. :-) > On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Yannick Patois wrote: > > > It seems that fontification is not converted

Re: LinuxDoc : table not rendered (in english ;)

2001-09-20 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 02:18:41PM +0200, Yannick Patois wrote: > Thanx for your answer. > > In fact I'm back to docbook... > > I answered myself one of the layout questions I had before (printing date > and version), and feel more confident since I read: > http://docbook.sourceforge.net/project

Re: LinuxDoc : table not rendered (in english ;)

2001-09-20 Thread Yannick Patois
Hi, Once again, I reply to myself ;) On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Yannick Patois wrote: > It seems that fontification is not converted in the docbook output: > > Lyx: > extract from newfile6.lyx > \layout Standard > > This sould be > \family typewriter > typewriter > \family default > and then >

Re: LinuxDoc : table not rendered (in english ;)

2001-09-20 Thread Yannick Patois
old several times before. If > someone wants to add this support for linuxdoc great, I will help. But > that's it. I can point were to look. > Try again docbook? :-)

Re: LinuxDoc : table not rendered (in english ;)

2001-09-20 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
). > ** Pas de problème pour moi. :-) > Lets me write this again: > > When I create a LinuxDoc doc with lyx, I can see that table I created are > not reproduced in the sgml output. There is just a small empty space > instead of the table. At moment the tables aren't outpu

LinuxDoc : table not rendered (in english ;)

2001-09-20 Thread Yannick Patois
Hum, ** Sorry for my previous message it was wrote in an un-undestandable jargon used by a small tribe somewhere in europa called 'French' (which means 'humain' in theyr own language). ** Lets me write this again: When I create a LinuxDoc doc with lyx, I can see that tab

LinuxDoc : tables non rendues

2001-09-20 Thread Yannick Patois
Bonjour, EN créant un document linuxdoc avec lyx, je me suis appercu que les tableaux que j'avais créés n'étaient pas reproduit une fois cojnvertis en sgml, il ne met 'rien' à la place. Une idée ? Merci, Yannick -- _/ Yannick Patois ___

Re: Autoconf check for lyx with linuxdoc

2001-08-19 Thread Arien Malec
I think my approach works: the problem was that I seemed to have a textclass.lst that listed docbook even thought I didn't have sgmltools v2. Perhaps the .debs don't reconfigure? When I ran configure manually as root, I got things cleaned up. So I believe that my Autoconf macro should be sufficien

Re: Autoconf check for lyx with linuxdoc

2001-08-18 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 06:04:31PM -0700, Arien Malec wrote: > I'm using lyx (1.1.6fix3) as a front-end to build Linuxdoc SGML. I've had some > problems with users either not using a version of Lyx that supports this, or > who haven't configured Lyx with sgmltools support

Autoconf check for lyx with linuxdoc

2001-08-14 Thread Arien Malec
I'm using lyx (1.1.6fix3) as a front-end to build Linuxdoc SGML. I've had some problems with users either not using a version of Lyx that supports this, or who haven't configured Lyx with sgmltools support, so I thought I'd write an Autoconf macro to check whether Lyx support

Re: LinuxDoc: I cant nest and

2001-08-04 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
hat the 'import' function from a linuxdoc document > doesnt reconstruct this structure (that let me think that Lyx couldnt do > it) should be considered as a bug ? I have fixed some bugs in sgml2lyx, but now since sgml-tools version 1 is dead I don't expect more bug fixes to it.

Re: LinuxDoc: I cant nest and

2001-08-03 Thread Yannick Patois
On Fri, 3 Aug 2001, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: > You want to do something like what is done in this attachement... Thanx you very much ! That's it. In this case, the fact that the 'import' function from a linuxdoc document doesnt reconstruct this structure (that let

Re: linuxdoc and windows

2001-06-07 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 12:29:35AM -0300, Orlando de Andrade Figueiredo wrote: > > Hello, Ola', ;-) > I want to generate Linuxdoc files with Lyx on Windows. Is it possible? The linuxdoc files are only useful if you can convert them to other formats. Is sgml-tools v1.

linuxdoc and windows

2001-06-05 Thread Orlando de Andrade Figueiredo
Hello, I want to generate Linuxdoc files with Lyx on Windows. Is it possible? Thanks, -- Orlando de Andrade Figueiredo -- Estudante de Mestrado em Computacao, USP, S.Carlos * Computer Science Graduate Student, Brazil

Re: LinuxDoc cannot handle pictures ?

2001-04-08 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 12:37:57PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote: > > Hi, > > When I use "SGML (LinuxDoc Article)" as my document format, I can include graphics > into the LyX-document, but when I export it as HTML, LaTeX or PS, the graphics is >gone. > > Is that a

LinuxDoc cannot handle pictures ?

2001-04-07 Thread R. Lahaye
Hi, When I use "SGML (LinuxDoc Article)" as my document format, I can include graphics into the LyX-document, but when I export it as HTML, LaTeX or PS, the graphics is gone. Is that a "feature" of LinuxDoc or a bug in my setup? Regards, Rob.

Re: SGML - Linuxdoc

2001-03-11 Thread ben
Guido Milanese a écrit : > This is probably a stupid question: I think the problem will regard > some basic environment setting, but I could not find a solution. > > In the Extended LyX manual I studied the section concerning LinuxDoc > and it works fine. I save the file as sgm

SGML - Linuxdoc

2001-03-11 Thread Guido Milanese
This is probably a stupid question: I think the problem will regard some basic environment setting, but I could not find a solution. In the Extended LyX manual I studied the section concerning LinuxDoc and it works fine. I save the file as sgml and I can use sgmltools to export the file as

Re: using include: with LinuxDoc Articles

2000-04-13 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 05:04:55PM -0400, Paul Lussier wrote: > > Hi all, Hi. > We're trying to use LyX here to document our network and computing enviroment. > We wanted to use the SGML Linuxdoc Class so we could produce PS and HTML from > the same source easily. &g

using include: with LinuxDoc Articles

2000-04-12 Thread Paul Lussier
Hi all, We're trying to use LyX here to document our network and computing enviroment. We wanted to use the SGML Linuxdoc Class so we could produce PS and HTML from the same source easily. What we wanted to do, though, we keep each major section as a standalone entity, which would

Re: Combination of DocBook, LinuxDoc and LyX -- once more

1999-11-25 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Fri, Nov 05, 1999 at 04:27:37PM +, Horst G Kausch wrote: > Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > One option here is to allow the user configuration of the docbook to dvi > > process. Something like: > > > > \docbook_dvi "sgmltools -b dvi $$FName" > > That would be

Re: eps imaaages don't work for LinuxDoc documents

1999-11-22 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Mon, Nov 22, 1999 at 09:38:11AM +0100, Marcel Lanz wrote: > hi, > > I am not on the mailinglist, please send me a response directly to my > email-address. tank you. Done. :) > My Problem: If I have a document with linuxDoc as document-class on all > exports to sgml o

eps imaaages don't work for LinuxDoc documents

1999-11-22 Thread Marcel Lanz
hi, I am not on the mailinglist, please send me a response directly to my email-address. tank you. My Problem: If I have a document with linuxDoc as document-class on all exports to sgml or ps or dvi failed for all included eps images. I can edit my sgml file and don't find anything abo

Re: LinuxDoc

1999-11-16 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Carlos A M dos Santos on Tue, 16 Nov 1999 12:07:01 -0200: > LinuxDoc is not a class. It is a style and must be used with article, book > or repor classes. It is part of sgml-tools an you can get a copy of it at > http://www.sgmltools.org. Ok, thanks for the clarification.

Re: LinuxDoc

1999-11-16 Thread Carlos A M dos Santos
On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, Andy Bradford wrote: > I realize that I may be slightly off topic asking about a cls for LaTeX but > could anyone give me some pointers as to where I can find a .cls for the > LinuxDoc documentclass? LinuxDoc is not a class. It is a style and must be used wit

Re: LinuxDoc

1999-11-16 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
> Hmm, maybe I am incorrect in assuming that there is a .cls for linuxdoc. > Maybe it is something else as it seems that linuxdoc uses sgml... linuxdoc is a SGML dtd, when previewing the document lyx converts the document to linuxdoc sgml and then the sgmltools, v1.0.x convert it to

Re: LinuxDoc

1999-11-15 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Andy Bradford on Mon, 15 Nov 1999 21:44:45 MST: > I realize that I may be slightly off topic asking about a cls for LaTeX but > could anyone give me some pointers as to where I can find a .cls for the > LinuxDoc documentclass? Hmm, maybe I am incorrect in assuming that t

LinuxDoc

1999-11-15 Thread Andy Bradford
I realize that I may be slightly off topic asking about a cls for LaTeX but could anyone give me some pointers as to where I can find a .cls for the LinuxDoc documentclass? Thanks. Andy -- +== Andy == TiK: garbaglio ==+ |Linux is about freedom of choice

Re: Finding linuxdoc-sgml.sty

1999-11-12 Thread Reuben Thomas
> Note that LyX-configure uses LaTeX to find the packeages so if > LyX-configure does not find it, LaTeX can not find it. That's not true, because the sgml2tex script sets up the paths so that LaTeX can find the relevant style files. -- http://sc3d.org/rrt/ | certain, a. insufficiently analyse

Re: Finding linuxdoc-sgml.sty

1999-11-11 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Reuben Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | needed for sgml2latex to work. It seems to me that LyX-configure should be | fixed so that it finds linuxdoc-sgml.sty without needing such a link. Note that LyX-configure uses LaTeX to find the packeages so if LyX-configure does not find it, LaT

Finding linuxdoc-sgml.sty

1999-11-11 Thread Reuben Thomas
I've just installed sgmltools v1 (LinuxDoc) as a RedHat package. When I reconfigured LyX, it found the converter sgml2lyx OK, but it didn't find linuxdoc-sgml.sty. Scanning the list archive, I find the solution: make a symlink from the TeX tree to /usr/lib/sgmltools. However, this i

Re: Table problem with Linuxdoc template

1999-10-15 Thread jdd
On ven, 15 oct 1999, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos à écrit >Hi David, > the linuxdoc dtd doesn't support tables. > > I should be warned that linuxdoc with lyx doesn't support >also figures. it's possible to trick this using both ps and gif (or jpeg)

Re: Table problem with Linuxdoc template

1999-10-15 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
Hi David, the linuxdoc dtd doesn't support tables. I should be warned that linuxdoc with lyx doesn't support also figures. So unless you have any major objection to docbook, my advice is to use docbook. Best regards, -- José

Re: Table problem with Linuxdoc template

1999-10-14 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 09:44:25PM -0400, David Nedrow wrote: > Why is it that tables are not rendered properly when the LinuxDoc > template is used? When rendered, the cell values are simply placed one > after another on a single line with no table regardless of output format.

Table problem with Linuxdoc template

1999-10-14 Thread David Nedrow
Why is it that tables are not rendered properly when the LinuxDoc template is used? When rendered, the cell values are simply placed one after another on a single line with no table regardless of output format. The DocBook template works, but I haven't figure out how to add a TOC to it.

LinuxDoc? DocBook?

1999-09-09 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
Is LyX only setup to work with the sgml-tools v1.0? I'm needing to produce documents in multiple formats and was thinking about using LyX to produce the SGML. How do I use DocBook instead of LinuxDoc with LyX? Is it possible? ---Kayvan -- Kayvan Aghaiepour S

Re: math/linuxdoc

1999-09-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>>>>> "Perez" == Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Perez> Hi, Math mode works fine but when I export my LyX document to Perez> Linuxdoc format (or when I try to preview my document with View Perez> Dvi or View Postscipt) all my math equations have P

math/linuxdoc

1999-09-06 Thread Perez
Hi, Math mode works fine but when I export my LyX document to Linuxdoc format (or when I try to preview my document with View Dvi or View Postscipt) all my math equations have disappeared. Any suggestions? I'm using LyX 1.0.1 and sgmltool 1.0.9 on a SuSE 6.2 box manuel

Re: Preserving Tables in LinuxDoc

1999-03-18 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>>>>> "Hugh" == Hugh Caley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hugh> Is there any way to preserve a table when a Lyx doc is converted Hugh> to SGML Linuxdoc? As far as I know, linuxdoc does not support tables. This means there is not much we can do about it, unfortunately. JMarc

Preserving Tables in LinuxDoc

1999-03-17 Thread Hugh Caley
Is there any way to preserve a table when a Lyx doc is converted to SGML Linuxdoc? Hugh -- "Brain-eating mutants are bad for business" - Battle Angel

Re: Finding linuxdoc-sgml.sty

1999-01-16 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>>>>> "Reuben" == Reuben Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Reuben> I've just installed sgmltools v1 (LinuxDoc) as a RedHat Reuben> package. When I reconfigured LyX, it found the converter Reuben> sgml2lyx OK, but it didn't find linuxdoc-sgml.s

Re: Combination of DocBook, LinuxDoc and LyX -- once more

1999-01-03 Thread Horst G Kausch
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One option here is to allow the user configuration of the docbook to dvi > process. Something like: > > \docbook_dvi "sgmltools -b dvi $$FName" That would be good since it allows to specify additional options, for example user defined s

Re: Combination of DocBook, LinuxDoc and LyX -- once more

1999-01-03 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
g both linuxdoc and docbook sgmltools is a problem with the rpm implementations. It should be easy to setup both rpm to reuse the common components. Second, when configuring lyx looks for the sgmltools installed, that was a strategic decision relating the docbook implementation. That is, the present d

Re: index list with Linuxdoc template

1999-01-03 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Fri, Nov 05, 1999 at 11:15:43AM +0100, Manuel Perez wrote: > I'm using LyX v 1.0.1 and the linuxdoc-template to generate SGML files. > > I've insert some Index entries and an Index list at the end of my Lyx > document but no index is generated on the SGML docum

Re: verbatim with Linuxdoc template

1999-01-03 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Fri, Nov 05, 1999 at 11:20:14AM +0100, Manuel Perez wrote: > I'm using LyX v 1.0.1 and the linuxdoc-template to generate SGML files. I'm using the same... > I want to insert source code in my document, when using "Code Style" > the white spaces are preserved

verbatim with Linuxdoc template

1999-01-03 Thread Manuel Perez
I'm using LyX v 1.0.1 and the linuxdoc-template to generate SGML files. I want to insert source code in my document, when using "Code Style" the white spaces are preserved but I have to put on all the end of lines a !! Is there another more friendly way to insert source code

index list with Linuxdoc template

1999-01-03 Thread Manuel Perez
I'm using LyX v 1.0.1 and the linuxdoc-template to generate SGML files. I've insert some Index entries and an Index list at the end of my Lyx document but no index is generated on the SGML document. What may be wrong? Does the linuxdoc-template support the index lists? manuel

Combination of DocBook, LinuxDoc and LyX -- once more

1999-01-02 Thread Prokopis Prokopidis
ion I added the following sgml related RPMs from the distribution cd and the RedHat powertools collection (ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/powertools/6.1/): sgml-common-0.1-6 sgml-tools-1.0.9-2 docbook-3.0-12 stylesheets-0.11rh-2 jade-1.2.1-6 jadetex-2.5-1 At this point, I was able to produce, Lin