Hi, On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 03:15:46PM +0200, Yannick Patois wrote: > > PS: I have a few other questions, that I asked myself about the way Lyx > > does this things (when fixing a few stuff in DocBook I went to the Lyx > > code): > > What were your problems? It's mentionned in: http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg14340.html But I think you replyed to me on those points. > The only place where the docbook is hardcoded is the one that refers > to listing environments. If you notice carefully this is the same both for > latex, linuxdoc and docbook. He have discussed this last year in > Norway, and Lars suggested powerful scheme for lists (enumerate, > itemize, description, etc) that is becoming easier to implement after > all the code cleanup that we had. OK. > As soon as we have a script language this could be passed to it. So > that the adition of a new export type would only require to add a > plugin for each inset to export the appropriate format. That's what I hope. Will also Lyx be ble to configure it's visual représentation and menues items according to such a description file ? > Not necessarely, what is important is the internal structure that > for some cases is not generic enough to support all the xml power. And > those even if correlated are not the same. > > If you have any ideas or hints regarding linuxdoc or docbook I would > like to hear. Thanks, I'm probably not that much good with it. But as I may have to work with this for some time, I may come with more remarks. Thanks for your attention, Yannick
