On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 08:59:31PM +0200, Tuukka Toivonen wrote:
> Just noticed something I previously hadn't, if I start lyx
> from terminal window, it says:
>
> Xlib: XDM authorization key matches an existing client!
> Error: Couldn't find per display information
> GS [12590] error 256 E:1 1 S
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Tuukka Toivonen wrote:
>I'm having rendering errors. 23 of 31 images do not display this time,
>so the percentage is big although some images randomly do display.
Just noticed something I previously hadn't, if I start lyx
from terminal window, it says:
Xlib: XDM authorizati
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 09:25:51PM +0200, Tuukka Toivonen wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Tuukka Toivonen wrote:
>
> >gs --version
>
> 6.51
last debian patchset I checked had the patch. I don't know if it's in
testing or whatever, but I have seen it ...
regards
john
--
"In no sense is [in]sta
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Tuukka Toivonen wrote:
>gs --version
6.51
(sorry for the missing line)
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, John Levon wrote:
>don't debian have a 6.52 package ? I believe this includes the necessary patch.
gs --version
Apparently not.
>Though given that some figures are rendering it sounds more like you are
>using the menus whilst rendering is completing which triggers the bug.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 05:48:21PM +0200, Tuukka Toivonen wrote:
> You wrote in November, as I saw in LyX-archives, but I couldn't find
> out your email address, so this answer is public:
>
> >Interesting. Can people email me privately to tell if they have rendering
> >problems, if so, which ver
You wrote in November, as I saw in LyX-archives, but I couldn't find
out your email address, so this answer is public:
>Interesting. Can people email me privately to tell if they have rendering
>problems, if so, which versions of LyX, which versions of xforms, and
>which versions of ghostscript
On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 04:09:57PM -0800, Ron Bardell wrote:
> Thanks! for the tip, Kathryn,
>
> It WORKS!! LyX can render included graphics, again.
> >
> > I am totally exhausted, but, just in case you are still struggling - two
> > months later - I thought I should email you. By the way, if y
ephen Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 18:34:06 -0800 (PST)
> From: Stephen Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Lyx Figure Rendering
>
> I hope you don't mind me contacting you off the mailing list, but I
> can't seem to
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 09:09:37AM -0800, Rich Shepard wrote:
> ghostscript versions < 6.0 have several problems. Version 6.5.0 is
> reported to be buggy, but 6.5.1 and higher are reported to be much more
> stable.
>
> I would suggest regenerating your eps results from xfig using the newer
>
On Sat, 10 Nov 2001, Norm Finlay wrote:
> My eps figures (from xfig) will not render either since upgrading from
> redhat62 to redhat72. Looks like the current thinking is that the
> problem stems from ghostscript. redhat62 used ghostscript5.50 and
> redhat72 uses ghostscript6.51. Version 6.52
Hello All:
My eps figures (from xfig) will not render either since upgrading from
redhat62 to redhat72. Looks like the current thinking is that the
problem stems from ghostscript. redhat62 used ghostscript5.50 and
redhat72 uses ghostscript6.51. Version 6.52 is available at
www.cs.wisc.edu/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 17:47, John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 11:39:08AM -0500, Laurent Duperval wrote:
> > Is 6.51 OK?
>
> it should be (was for me)
Well, it did not work for me. It said rendering..., but it didn't do
anything. So I now re-instal
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 11:39:08AM -0500, Laurent Duperval wrote:
> Is 6.51 OK?
it should be (was for me)
regards
john
--
"I'm dismayed whenever libertarianism and programming are associated; in my
mind, it is as nebulous as associating people who write books as communists or
those who read
On 3 Nov, Markus Mohr wrote:
> Nelson Hogg wrote:
>>
>> I can see that others have had problems with figure rendering in lyx
>> but I can't find the solution. Maybe one of you experts can point me
>> there. Before upgrading to mandrake 8.1 figures were render
Nelson Hogg wrote:
>
> I can see that others have had problems with figure rendering in lyx but
> I can't find the solution. Maybe one of you experts can point me there.
> Before upgrading to mandrake 8.1 figures were rendered properly in the
> lyx window. Now it just says
I can see that others have had problems with figure rendering in lyx but
I can't find the solution. Maybe one of you experts can point me there.
Before upgrading to mandrake 8.1 figures were rendered properly in the
lyx window. Now it just says "rendering" and the box r
17 matches
Mail list logo
