Helge Hafting wrote:
You can use lists and reimplement enumeration. Lists are supported
to 6 levels. I don't know if you need to change lyx too.
This takes about half a page of latex code.
I did something similiar. Not to get more levels, but to get
enumerations with a very different layout.
th
Jim Ragsdale wrote:
Is there a way to get around the 4 deep limit on an enumeration? I am making
an outline and it would be nice to go to a depth of 5.
Thanks,
Jim Ragsdale
You can use lists and reimplement enumeration. Lists are supported
to 6 levels. I don't know if you need to change lyx too.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:33:57PM -0600, Jim Ragsdale wrote:
> Is there a way to get around the 4 deep limit on an enumeration? I am making
> an outline and it would be nice to go to a depth of 5.
I think this is a LaTeX limitation.
I'd think you could simply copy relevant parts from
.../texmf/t
Is there a way to get around the 4 deep limit on an enumeration? I am making
an outline and it would be nice to go to a depth of 5.
Thanks,
Jim Ragsdale
gt; > i
> > ii
> > 2.
> >
> > Would like to skip the first level and get directly to the second enumeration
>depth as default.
> >
> > Is there any quick fix (in the LaTeX preamble)??
>
> in latex preamble or anywhere in the text
Staffan Ringbom wrote:
>
> Hi,
> The default enumeration style in lyx is
> [(1)], [(a)],, [(i)] "number, letter, i" something like this
>
> 1.
>a
> i
> b
> i
> ii
> 2.
>
> Would like to skip the first level a
this
>
> 1.
>a
> i
> b
> i
> ii
> 2.
>
> Would like to skip the first level and get directly to the second enumeration depth
>as default.
>
> Is there any quick fix (in the LaTeX preamble)??
>
> (The nasty way to do it
Hi,
The default enumeration style in lyx is
[(1)], [(a)],, [(i)] "number, letter, i" something like this
1.
a
i
b
i
ii
2.
Would like to skip the first level and get directly to the second enumeration depth as
default.
Is there any quick fix (in
