Thank you Matej for your attention to this problem,
Have a nice day,
Wayan
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 00:32:12 -0500
> From: Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Re: amsref (was: customizing natbib)
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 01:45:58PM +0100, Wayan wrote:
> thank you. I have already used ERT, but the problem is the
> citation not appears in the text. I have only use \cite{} and
> \ocite{}. When I viewed as PostScript, that only show: (?mil99)
> for \cite{mil99) and () for \ocite{mil99). I am us
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Matej Cepl wrote:
> I believe that amsrefs should be AMS-independent and that there must be
> some problem with it. I did proposed to turn to AMS-managed list with
> further questions.
Sorry, I did not make a reply for your suggestion. I have sent an email to
the amsrefs de
Matej Cepl wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 08:46:12AM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>>it's a problem to choose a special ams package and a german
>>textclass.
>>
>
> I believe that amsrefs should be AMS-independent and that there
> must be some problem with it. I did proposed to turn to
> AMS-m
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 08:46:12AM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> it's a problem to choose a special ams package and a german
> textclass.
I believe that amsrefs should be AMS-independent and that there
must be some problem with it. I did proposed to turn to
AMS-managed list with further questions.
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Wayan wrote:
> > don't use package hyperref. Delete it from
> > preamble and try again. At least load hyperref at
> > very last package.
>
> Thank you for your respons. Now the \cite{} command is right,
> but the \ocite{} command is still false. The \ocite{} command
> do not
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Herbert Voss wrote:
> don't use package hyperref. Delete it from
> preamble and try again. At least load hyperref at
> very last package.
Thank you for your respons. Now the \cite{} command is right,
but the \ocite{} command is still false. The \ocite{} command
do not make
Wayan wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Matej Cepl wrote:
>
>
>>Could you send short example file, please?
>>
>
> Thank you for rapid respons. I attaced an zip file
> which consist of example.lyx, example.pdf and
> myref.bib.
don't use package hyperref. Delete it from
preamble and try again. At
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 03:25:11AM +0100, Wayan wrote:
> > Could you send short example file, please?
>
> Thank you for rapid respons. I attaced an zip file
> which consist of example.lyx, example.pdf and
> myref.bib.
I am clueless. I have my paper tonight, so I cannot spent much
time with that,
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Could you send short example file, please?
Thank you for rapid respons. I attaced an zip file
which consist of example.lyx, example.pdf and
myref.bib.
TIA,
Wayan
example.zip
Description: example
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 01:45:58PM +0100, Wayan wrote:
> thank you. I have already used ERT, but the problem is the citation not
> appears in the text. I have only use \cite{} and \ocite{}. When I viewed
> as PostScript, that only show: (?mil99) for \cite{mil99) and () for
> \ocite{mil99). I am us
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Guenter Milde wrote:
> Just now (1.1.6fix3), the popup only supports \cite, all other citations
> need ERT. (if you only need one different command, you can redefine
> \cite in the preamble)
thank you. I have already used ERT, but the problem is the citation not
appears in
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002 12:38:41 +0100 (MET) wrote Wayan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> How can we make a different between \cite{} and \ocite{} in the pop-up
> menu Citation. I haven't seen it, or should we use manually with ERT
> command?
Just now (1.1.6fix3), the popup only supports \cite, all other cit
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Guenter Milde wrote:
> I totally agree. My feature request was to enable the >Insert>Citation
> dialog to work with a amsref *.ltb database as well as with a *.bib, showing
> the available keys and their content.
>
> Also, amsref has a more helpfull error-reporting, so that
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002 11:51:44 +0100 (MET) wrote "Jean-Pierre.Chretien"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You may use the bib record structure to declare more fields than
> what is actually needed by the bst files (I personnaly used for a while
> bib records for address database indexing with bibindex), so
15 matches
Mail list logo
