Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

2005-12-15 Thread Stephen Harris
- Original Message - From: "Angus Leeming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 1:03 AM Subject: Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into] "The installer searches the Registry in various ways in order to find

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

2005-12-14 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:23:01 -0800, Stephen Harris wrote: > I don't want to generalize from your particular aptitude. I think maybe > (conservatively) 3 in 100 Windows users realizes the value of adding the > LyX helper apps to the Windows Path variable. Which is why I wrote: [snip very long repl

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

2005-12-14 Thread Stephen Harris
- Original Message - From: "Enrico Forestieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 3:57 AM Subject: Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into] On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 23:54:21 -0800, Ste

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

2005-12-14 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 23:54:21 -0800, Stephen Harris wrote: > No, he did not. I'll get back to that. I appreciate your calm response. > > This is what Angus initially said to me: > > "The installer searches the Registry in various ways in order to find the > whereabouts of sh.exe, gswinc.exe, pyth

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

2005-12-14 Thread Angus Leeming
Stephen Harris wrote: > No, he did not. I'll get back to that. I appreciate your calm response. ;-) > This is what Angus initially said to me: > > "The installer searches the Registry in various ways in order to find the > whereabouts of sh.exe, gswinc.exe, python.exe, etc. It's blindingly > obv

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

2005-12-13 Thread Stephen Harris
- Original Message - From: "Enrico Forestieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 7:02 PM Subject: Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into] Stephen Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I wish I were

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

2005-12-13 Thread Stephen Harris
- Original Message - From: "Angus Leeming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 2:41 PM Subject: Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into] Think of both the registry and the PATH environment variable as simply *hint

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

2005-12-13 Thread Enrico Forestieri
Stephen Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I wish I were smarter so that it would be blindingly obvious to me too. > I envision four(5) scenarios: I see that Angus already answered your questions. I think that your doubts are due to a misconception of the PATH. Please, have a look here http:

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

2005-12-13 Thread Angus Leeming
Stephen Harris wrote: >> The installer searches the Registry in various ways in order to find the >> whereabouts of sh.exe, gswinc.exe, python.exe, etc. It's blindingly >> obvious that it should first ascertain whether these things are already >> in the PATH. Never mind ;-) By which I meant that I

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

2005-12-13 Thread Stephen Harris
- Original Message - From: "Angus Leeming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 11:11 AM Subject: Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into] Stephen Harris wrote: On my computer, the contents of \path_prefix are a

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

2005-12-13 Thread Stephen Harris
- Original Message - From: "Enrico Forestieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 9:17 AM Subject: Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into] Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Formally, that's t

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

2005-12-13 Thread Angus Leeming
Stephen Harris wrote: > On my computer, the contents of \path_prefix are a subset of the > Windows PATH environment variable because I've manually added > them. Checking the contents of PATH and comparing it to LyX's > \path_prefix to determine accuracy seems awfully smart, like AI. The installer

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

2005-12-13 Thread Angus Leeming
Enrico Forestieri wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Formally, that's the PATH environment variable. To be honest, I don't >> think that I check the contents of this variable when generating the >> contents of \path_prefix. Clearly I should have > > Angus, you did a wonderfu

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

2005-12-13 Thread Stephen Harris
- Original Message - From: "Angus Leeming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 4:54 AM Subject: Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into] Stephen Harris wrote: - Original Message - From: "Enrico For

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

2005-12-13 Thread Enrico Forestieri
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Formally, that's the PATH environment variable. To be honest, I don't think > that I check the contents of this variable when generating the contents of > \path_prefix. Clearly I should have Angus, you did a wonderful job. I saw people which started us

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

2005-12-13 Thread Angus Leeming
Stephen Harris wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "Enrico Forestieri" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: > Sent: Monday, > December 12, 2005 5:17 PM Subject: Re: There's Something About > Textclass.lst [WinXP, in

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

2005-12-12 Thread Stephen Harris
- Original Message - From: "Enrico Forestieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 5:17 PM Subject: Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into] because I think it is very likely that if

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

2005-12-12 Thread Stephen Harris
- Original Message - From: "Paul A. Rubin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 3:05 PM Subject: Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into] Angus Leeming wrote: Enrico Forestieri wrote: Angus, what about a

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

2005-12-12 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:42:19 -0800, Stephen Harris wrote: > > This particular subject was about the Uwe .51 complete installer. > The OP had already tried "sh.exe configure" and it didn't work. > The OP does not have admin rights and that most likely is the > problem. I must have missed this bit.

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

2005-12-12 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Angus Leeming wrote: Enrico Forestieri wrote: Angus, what about a configure.bat script? Y'know, sometimes the simplest ideas are the best ;-) However, don't we need admin privileges to generate files in C:\Program Files\LyX\Resources\lyx ? Not positive, but I don't think so. Whomsoever

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

2005-12-12 Thread Enrico Forestieri
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > However, don't we need admin privileges to generate files in C:\Program > Files\LyX\Resources\lyx ? > I really don't know. My win2k came preinstalled on a FAT32 partition, so I don't need privileges to write everywhere on disk, and I never used Windo

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

2005-12-12 Thread Stephen Harris
- Original Message - From: "Enrico Forestieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 8:48 AM Subject: Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into] Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: From an MSYS terminal w

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

2005-12-12 Thread Angus Leeming
Enrico Forestieri wrote: > Angus, what about a configure.bat script? Y'know, sometimes the simplest ideas are the best ;-) However, don't we need admin privileges to generate files in C:\Program Files\LyX\Resources\lyx ? -- Angus

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

2005-12-12 Thread Enrico Forestieri
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > From an MSYS terminal window (maybe even a cmd.exe one for all I know): > > cd "C:/Program Files/LyX/Resources/lyx" > /sh.exe configure > > That will generate the missing files. Angus, what about a configure.bat script? Perhaps it can also solve th

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

2005-12-12 Thread Angus Leeming
Tariq Kamal wrote: > Hello! > > I'm a relatively new user to LyX (installed it a couple of months ago > in my laptop, and I've barely scratched the surface of its > functionality). As it was, I figured that installing LyX into my work > system would be a good idea. So I downloaded the > LyXWin137

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

2005-12-11 Thread Stephen Harris
- Original Message - From: "Tariq Kamal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "LyX Users Mailing List" Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2005 11:28 PM Subject: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into] Hello! Everything so far has failed, and I

There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

2005-12-11 Thread Tariq Kamal
Hello! I'm a relatively new user to LyX (installed it a couple of months ago in my laptop, and I've barely scratched the surface of its functionality). As it was, I figured that installing LyX into my work system would be a good idea. So I downloaded the LyXWin137preComplete-0-51.exe package for i