Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > - possibility to use graphics dialog for changin group definition as it
> > is now without any additional clicking around (i'm not sure we agree
> > here) - possibility to define new group inside the graphics dialog (also
> > not sure about your position)
>
> I thin
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> - possibility to use context menu for assign (i think we agree here)
Yes
> - possibility to use graphics dialog for changin group definition as it
> is now without any additional clicking around (i'm not sure we agree
> here) - possibility to define new group inside the gra
> > imho Document->Settings way is very unpractical. my usual worflow is not to
> > define set of groups and then assign them images, but to have set of images
> > and start to create new groups via dialog without even closing it.
>
> My problem with the current approach is that graphic groups are
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> imho Document->Settings way is very unpractical. my usual worflow is not to
> define set of groups and then assign them images, but to have set of images
> and start to create new groups via dialog without even closing it.
My problem with the current approach is that graphic g
> Pavel Sanda writes:
> > i also accept your critics, but this was to be addressed when i was trying
> > to
> > get the attention for design details of this feature. when i didn't get the
> > feedback i did it the way i like to use it;
>
> Pissed off already?
friday!
ok, on wrong list :)
pavel
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > i also accept your critics, but this was to be addressed when i was trying
> > to get the attention for design details of this feature. when i didn't get
> > the feedback i did it the way i like to use it; now i don't have time nor
> > interest to rewrite it for a different
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> i also accept your critics, but this was to be addressed when i was trying
> to get the attention for design details of this feature. when i didn't get
> the feedback i did it the way i like to use it; now i don't have time nor
> interest to rewrite it for a different philosoph
Pavel Sanda writes:
> i also accept your critics, but this was to be addressed when i was trying to
> get the attention for design details of this feature. when i didn't get the
> feedback i did it the way i like to use it;
Pissed off already?
JMarc
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > the point 2 is the only one i was a bit worried about. context menu
> > selection is done on purpose, since it seemed to be most effective
> > way how to work with groups for me.
>
> User actions should never ever be restricted to context menu exclusively.
yes, thats why
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> the point 2 is the only one i was a bit worried about. context menu
> selection is done on purpose, since it seemed to be most effective
> way how to work with groups for me.
User actions should never ever be restricted to context menu exclusively.
Frankly, the graphic group
> 1. The gui works in another way than many lyx options. Take the
> 'local layout' option from the document options (In document
> class tab) as an example on how I would expect it to work.
> (A list of layouts-> add layout button-> new window to specify
> the new layout-> new layout added)
>
> -Opprinnelig melding-
> Fra: Pavel Sanda [mailto:sa...@lyx.org]
> Sendt: 9. januar 2009 09:51
> Til: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
> Emne: Re: What is groupId in GraphicsUi
>
> Manveru schreef:
> > I hadn't read this in manual, but from your explanations it
> seem to be
> > very user not-
12 matches
Mail list logo
