Folks
Just a quick update here. I found (accidentially) that the problem
was the eps file. After some googling, I have found that ghostview
creates postscript files which look much better.
Thanks for all your answers :-)
Cheers
André
PS: Actually, I was writing quite a long version of th
> [André]
>
> Just one more question about the background image. Here, and in the doc
> you
> sent, too, the picture looks like a badly compressed jpeg, although we
> feed a
> nice clean eps. I found no information about this, neither in the
> graphicx nor
> in the eso-pic documentation. Do you
_/ On Thu 24 Nov 2005 14:26:41 GMT, [Bonhôte, André] wrote : \_
Hi Uwe
On Nov 24, 2005, at 1441, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
The problem is not the pixelization, rather the bad quality. I
have put up some examples here[1].
- Header.png is the png I am using
The problem _is_ the pixelation. Yo
Bonhôte, André wrote:
This works fine as long as it is "eps". Now, I have converted the eps
to a zip-compressed pdf (Photoshop), and replaced the filename. Tadaa!
Not working. "LaTeX Error: Cannot determine size of graphic".
I really hope to get this sorted soon, somehow. Can I ask pdflatex
Hi Uwe
On Nov 24, 2005, at 1441, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
The problem is not the pixelization, rather the bad quality. I
have put up some examples here[1].
- Header.png is the png I am using
The problem _is_ the pixelation. You will always have bad results
when you zoom into a jpg, gif, png etc
Bonhôte, André schrieb:
Why are you surprised? PNG is a bitmap format, so of course things look
pixelated if you zoom in. The only real way to solve your problem is to
create a vector graphics image. There are some really intuitive svg
editors out there...
The problem is not the pixelization
Hi all
On Nov 24, 2005, at 1143, Angus Leeming wrote:
Why are you surprised? PNG is a bitmap format, so of course things
look
pixelated if you zoom in. The only real way to solve your problem
is to
create a vector graphics image. There are some really intuitive svg
editors out there...
Martin A. Hansen wrote:
> INKSCAPE!!!
>
> www.inkscape.org
>
> i am totally in love with inkscape, which is the coolest application next
> to lyx. inkscape needs to be mentioned in the wiki and in the lyx docs
> (which endorses xfig - and xfig is crap compared to inkscape!).
Oh, xfig is good for
INKSCAPE!!!
www.inkscape.org
i am totally in love with inkscape, which is the coolest application next to
lyx. inkscape needs to be mentioned in the wiki and in the lyx docs (which
endorses xfig - and xfig is crap compared to inkscape!).
;oP
martin
On 24/11/05, Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTEC
Bonhôte, André wrote:
> I have a PNG which I have converted to .eps using Photoshop (Mac). I
> set it as background image using eso-pic and graphicx. Now,
> everything looks fine, seen from far. But zooming in, the background
> image looks like a badly compressed jpeg, like 60% quality. I have
> te
Hi!
Slowly, my old and rusty LaTeX knowledge is coming back.
Unfortunately, I stumble over a problem I can't solve using Google.
I have a PNG which I have converted to .eps using Photoshop (Mac). I
set it as background image using eso-pic and graphicx. Now,
everything looks fine, seen fro
11 matches
Mail list logo
