"R. Lahaye" a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I started a docbook document, hoping that this would be the base format for
> conversion later to sgml, html, latex etc. Is that the right choice?
I bet on it. :-)
> When I export the LyX-Docbook document as html or latex, the sgml2html/sgml2latex
>complains:
T
> I started a docbook document, hoping that this would be the base format for
> conversion later to sgml, html, latex etc. Is that the right choice?
>
> PS: I have SGML-Tools version 1.0.9 on my Linux Mandrake 7.2 PC.
> LyX version is 1.2.0cvs
docbook is dosbook and sgml-tools are sgml-tools. In
Hi,
I started a docbook document, hoping that this would be the base format for
conversion later to sgml, html, latex etc. Is that the right choice?
When I export the LyX-Docbook document as html or latex, the sgml2html/sgml2latex
complains:
load_char_maps: no entity maps found
parse_data: no
Thanks for answering.
Yes I should change to Redhat 6 BUT -
the machines are heavily used for software developemnt.
I cannot upgrade without a rather disruptive unload and restore.
I am now too tight for room in the vital partitions for an
uneventful upgrade.
I also have a lot of Informix applicat
I didn't see this till now since your Emails (from hotmail) are put into
my junk folder by my procmail junkfilter recipes.
On Sun, Mar 05, 2000 at 01:31:50AM -0800, John O'Gorman wrote:
>
> The site was a revelation to me. I was not aware of their carrying
> the sgmltools ball on from sgml.org.
Thanks to Chris Sawtell, Luc Taesch, and Jose Matos I now do
have Docbook capability on Redhat 6.1.
The answer there was as Luc and Jose said - to use the sgmltools
from the sylvan.com site.
The site was a revelation to me. I was not aware of their carrying
the sgmltools ball on from sgml.org. W
