> I see my gcc 3.0 is missing :-) am I among the 2.96?
x+ means 'x or newer and not falling in one of the other classes'.
Yes, you got counted towards the 2.96+. I hope you do not feel
discriminated ;-)
> I'd opt for not supporting anything older than 2.95.2.
>
> one reason: it is not likely
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| The picture has not changed much from the intermediate results. It is now
|
| 1 g++ 2.7.3
| 0 2.8.1
| 7 2.91.66+
| 21 2.95.2+
| 1 Digital C++ V6.1
| 1 Sun CC 6.0
| 1 Compaq cxx V6.2-024
| 6 2.96+
| 6 .rpm
|
| I might have got somethin
The picture has not changed much from the intermediate results. It is now
1 g++ 2.7.3
0 2.8.1
7 2.91.66+
21 2.95.2+
1 Digital C++ V6.1
1 Sun CC 6.0
1 Compaq cxx V6.2-024
6 2.96+
6 .rpm
I might have got something wrong in the lower part, but the important bit
should be right: Nob
