Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| The picture has not changed much from the intermediate results. It is now
|
| 1 g++ 2.7.3
| 0 2.8.1
| 7 2.91.66+
| 21 2.95.2+
| 1 Digital C++ V6.1
| 1 Sun CC 6.0
| 1 Compaq cxx V6.2-024
| 6 2.96+
| 6 .rpm
|
| I might have got something wrong in the lower part, but the important bit
| should be right: Nobody is forced to use g++ 2.8.* right now, but the
| 2.7.3 does not want to upgrade because the software is tuned to compiler
| version/c-lib.
I see my gcc 3.0 is missing :-) am I among the 2.96?
I'd opt for not supporting anything older than 2.95.2.
one reason: it is not likely that number of 2.91.66 users will
increase, rather the opposite.
Lgb
