Am 09.12.2016 um 08:31 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Am Donnerstag, den 08.12.2016, 15:22 +0100 schrieb Oliver Margraf:
>> Am 08.12.2016 um 15:15 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
>>> Am Donnerstag, den 08.12.2016, 14:58 +0100 schrieb Oliver Margraf:
Sure - see attachment (exported for XeTeX).
>>>
Am 09.12.2016 um 08:31 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Am Donnerstag, den 08.12.2016, 15:22 +0100 schrieb Oliver Margraf:
>> Am 08.12.2016 um 15:15 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
>>> Am Donnerstag, den 08.12.2016, 14:58 +0100 schrieb Oliver Margraf:
Sure - see attachment (exported for XeTeX).
>>>
Am Donnerstag, den 08.12.2016, 15:22 +0100 schrieb Oliver Margraf:
> Am 08.12.2016 um 15:15 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 08.12.2016, 14:58 +0100 schrieb Oliver Margraf:
> > > Sure - see attachment (exported for XeTeX).
> >
> > Strange. I don't get the comma with this file eit
Am 08.12.2016 um 15:15 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Am Donnerstag, den 08.12.2016, 14:58 +0100 schrieb Oliver Margraf:
>> Sure - see attachment (exported for XeTeX).
>
> Strange. I don't get the comma with this file either.
Strange indeed...
> Does it help if you modify/remove this definition f
Am Donnerstag, den 08.12.2016, 14:58 +0100 schrieb Oliver Margraf:
> Sure - see attachment (exported for XeTeX).
Strange. I don't get the comma with this file either.
Does it help if you modify/remove this definition from your preamble?
\DefineBibliographyStrings{german}{andothers = {{et\,al\add
to start investigation?
>
> Could you post the LaTeX export of your file?
Sure - see attachment (exported for XeTeX).
Oliver
%% LyX 2.1.4 created this file. For more info, see http://www.lyx.org/.
%% Do not edit unless you really know what you are doing.
\RequirePackage{fixltx2e}
\docume
Am Donnerstag, den 08.12.2016, 14:17 +0100 schrieb Oliver Margraf:
> That is interesting - could this be related to a certain version of
> biblatex
Don't think so.
> or what would be a good place to start investigation?
Could you post the LaTeX export of your file?
Jürgen
>
> Oliver
signatu
Am 08.12.2016 um 14:10 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Am Donnerstag, den 08.12.2016, 14:05 +0100 schrieb Oliver Margraf:
>> When I compile it, I get it with a comma - please see attachment.
>
> I don't.
That is interesting - could this be related to a certain version of
biblatex or what would be
Am Donnerstag, den 08.12.2016, 14:05 +0100 schrieb Oliver Margraf:
> When I compile it, I get it with a comma - please see attachment.
I don't.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Am 08.12.2016 um 13:13 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Am Donnerstag, den 08.12.2016, 11:14 +0100 schrieb Oliver Margraf:
>> Thank you, that almost solves my problem, yet it still puts a comma
>> after the author (basically the initial problem I tried to circumvent
>> with bibpunct). Is there a way
Am Donnerstag, den 08.12.2016, 11:14 +0100 schrieb Oliver Margraf:
> Thank you, that almost solves my problem, yet it still puts a comma
> after the author (basically the initial problem I tried to circumvent
> with bibpunct). Is there a way to get rid of that as well?
I don't see that in your tes
Am 08.12.2016 um 11:08 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> \renewbibmacro*{textcite:postnote}{%
> \ifbool{cbx:parens}
>{\bibcloseparen}
>{}
> \iffieldundef{postnote}
> {}
> {\ifbool{cbx:parens}
>{\setunit{\postnotedelim}}
>{\setunit{\extpostnotedelim\bibopenp
Am Donnerstag, den 08.12.2016, 11:03 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Am Donnerstag, den 08.12.2016, 10:42 +0100 schrieb Oliver Margraf:
> > Thanks, but these commands are already in the document - that's why
> > I'm
> > not getting it, where the problem is. You can check in the example
> > -
>
Am Donnerstag, den 08.12.2016, 10:42 +0100 schrieb Oliver Margraf:
> Thanks, but these commands are already in the document - that's why
> I'm
> not getting it, where the problem is. You can check in the example -
> has
> the same settings as my original doc.
I see, I misread. Try
\renewbibmacro*
Am 08.12.2016 um 10:36 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Am Donnerstag, den 08.12.2016, 10:24 +0100 schrieb Oliver Margraf:
>> Dear LyXers,
>>
>> after using LyX now for over a decade (thanks to the developers,
>> great
>> job!), I recently ran into a slight problem where I haven't been able
>> yet t
Am Donnerstag, den 08.12.2016, 10:24 +0100 schrieb Oliver Margraf:
> Dear LyXers,
>
> after using LyX now for over a decade (thanks to the developers,
> great
> job!), I recently ran into a slight problem where I haven't been able
> yet to figure out what the cause could be.
> I'm currently writin
he \usepackage{natbib} in the
preamble, I get also an error, that natbib is already in use - which is
logical, since it is activated in the settings.
I'm using XeTeX for compiling, LyX 2.1.4 and TeXlive 2015 - running on
Linux Mint
Attached is a small example with my current settings.
Would b
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:07:42AM +0200, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 6:52 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 05:18:16AM +0200, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 03:40:48AM +020
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 6:52 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 05:18:16AM +0200, Liviu Andronic wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 03:40:48AM +0200, Liviu Andronic wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Scott K
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 05:18:16AM +0200, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 03:40:48AM +0200, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 07:04:27AM +00
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 03:40:48AM +0200, Liviu Andronic wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 07:04:27AM +, Hermann Josef Eckl wrote:
>> >> Thank you Liviu for this further exp
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 03:40:48AM +0200, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 07:04:27AM +, Hermann Josef Eckl wrote:
> >> Thank you Liviu for this further explanation. I understand that LyX has a
> >> history of problems
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 07:04:27AM +, Hermann Josef Eckl wrote:
>> Thank you Liviu for this further explanation. I understand that LyX has a
>> history of problems with clipoard managers. In the current case this seems
>> triggered by
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 07:04:27AM +, Hermann Josef Eckl wrote:
> Thank you Liviu for this further explanation. I understand that LyX has a
> history of problems with clipoard managers. In the current case this seems
> triggered by a buggy version of gpaste, which causes also other problems.
Thank you Liviu for this further explanation. I understand that LyX has a
history of problems with clipoard managers. In the current case this seems
triggered by a buggy version of gpaste, which causes also other problems.
But fortunately, there is an easy solution, if gpaste is replaced by
ano
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 10:41 PM, Hermann Josef Eckl
wrote:
> Thank you, Scott and all here.
>
> I have tested now the situation on 4 computers and I can confirm, that the
> gpaste-extension for the GNOME Shell interferes with LyX, so that problems
> in selecting text occur.
>
> As soon as I remov
Thank you, Scott and all here.
I have tested now the situation on 4 computers and I can confirm, that the
gpaste-extension for the GNOME Shell interferes with LyX, so that problems
in selecting text occur.
As soon as I remove gpaste LyX works normally. The gpaste extension
consists of 4 packag
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 09:08:16PM +, Hermann Josef Eckl wrote:
> Thank you very much, Jean-Marc. It seems, that you gave me an important
> hint for the solution of my problem.
>
> I have installed the "gpaste"-extension for the GNOME Shell, which is
> provided as a package of Ubuntu 16.04.
and fails after some words or paragraphs, regardless of
>>>> whether I am selecting with the mouse or with keyboard shortcuts. ALl
>>>> other programmes (text editor, Libre Office etc.) are working
>>>> correctly and I can select text withput any problems.
>>
Thank you very much, Jean-Marc. It seems, that you gave me an important
hint for the solution of my problem.
I have installed the "gpaste"-extension for the GNOME Shell, which is
provided as a package of Ubuntu 16.04.
It seems that gpaste has some severe bugs. As soon as I remove it, the
text
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 09/06/2016 11:11, Hermann Josef Eckl a écrit :
>>
>> Thank you, Guillaume, for your advice. I tried this PPA with LyX 2.2.
>>
>> Unfortunately the problem persists also with this new version.
>> Additionally, the selection of text is VERY
Le 09/06/2016 11:11, Hermann Josef Eckl a écrit :
Thank you, Guillaume, for your advice. I tried this PPA with LyX 2.2.
Unfortunately the problem persists also with this new version.
Additionally, the selection of text is VERY slowly and the selection
breaks again after some words or lines.
You
Le 08/06/2016 à 09:06, Hermann J. Eckl a écrit :
Currently I have installed Ubuntu 16.04 LTS - and am facing a very strange
an annoying problem: I have difficulties to select longer or even shortes
pieces of text with the keyboard or mouse.
That seems very strange an annoying indeed.
If I am
less of
>>> whether I am selecting with the mouse or with keyboard shortcuts. ALl
>>> other programmes (text editor, Libre Office etc.) are working correctly
>>> and I can select text withput any problems.
>>>
>>> I am facing this problem with at least 4 c
ardless of
>> whether I am selecting with the mouse or with keyboard shortcuts. ALl
>> other programmes (text editor, Libre Office etc.) are working correctly
>> and I can select text withput any problems.
>>
>> I am facing this problem with at least 4 computers, all of
the mouse or with keyboard shortcuts. ALl other programmes
> (text editor, Libre Office etc.) are working correctly and I can select text
> withput any problems.
>
> I am facing this problem with at least 4 computers, all of them have
> installed Ubuntu 16.04 LTS and LyX 2.1.4. I am ru
computers, all of them have
installed Ubuntu 16.04 LTS and LyX 2.1.4. I am running another machine with
Debian 8.x and have no problems at all. Of course I have tried different
keyboards and mice, I have also reinstalled Lyx and TexLive and I have
deleted my old Lyx configuration files.
I would
select text
withput any problems.
I am facing this problem with at least 4 computers, all of them have
installed Ubuntu 16.04 LTS and LyX 2.1.4. I am running another machine with
Debian 8.x and have no problems at all. Of course I have tried different
keyboards and mice, I have also reinstalled Lyx and
the problem? In any case,
> > it's good news that it happens less often on 2.2.0alpha2 than 2.1.4.
> >
> > Scott
> >
> >>> On 1 Mar 2016, at 17:32, PhilipPirrip wrote:
> >>>
> >>> In addition to what Scott said: can you share the doc
t; > Scott
> >
> >>> On 1 Mar 2016, at 17:32, PhilipPirrip wrote:
> >>>
> >>> In addition to what Scott said: can you share the document that's causing
> >>> you problems, I can test it on Fedora 23 in both LyX 2.1.4 and LyX
> >
rrip wrote:
>>>
>>> In addition to what Scott said: can you share the document that's causing
>>> you problems, I can test it on Fedora 23 in both LyX 2.1.4 and LyX 2.2.0dev
>>> for you.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 03/
rrip wrote:
>>>
>>> In addition to what Scott said: can you share the document that's causing
>>> you problems, I can test it on Fedora 23 in both LyX 2.1.4 and LyX 2.2.0dev
>>> for you.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>&g
t; On 1 Mar 2016, at 17:32, PhilipPirrip wrote:
> >
> > In addition to what Scott said: can you share the document that's causing
> > you problems, I can test it on Fedora 23 in both LyX 2.1.4 and LyX 2.2.0dev
> > for you.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
every day). One
good reason to try the new beta!
> On 1 Mar 2016, at 17:32, PhilipPirrip wrote:
>
> In addition to what Scott said: can you share the document that's causing you
> problems, I can test it on Fedora 23 in both LyX 2.1.4 and LyX 2.2.0dev for
> you.
>
>
&
In addition to what Scott said: can you share the document that's
causing you problems, I can test it on Fedora 23 in both LyX 2.1.4 and
LyX 2.2.0dev for you.
On 03/01/2016 04:18 AM, Alexander Stasinski wrote:
(Apologies if this has already been discussed. I searched the archive
an
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 09:18:48AM +, Alexander Stasinski wrote:
> (Apologies if this has already been discussed. I searched the archive
> and bug reports and did not find anything related. Perhaps I didn't
> search well enough.)
>
> I'm using LyX 2.1.4 on Fedora
(Apologies if this has already been discussed. I searched the archive
and bug reports and did not find anything related. Perhaps I didn't
search well enough.)
I'm using LyX 2.1.4 on Fedora 22 (4.3.4-200.fc22.x86_64) with instant
math preview on. After editing about a page of maths for
On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 01:04:01AM +0100, Cristoforo Demartino wrote:
> I installed LyX 2.1.4. on a Mac with El Capitan. When I insert a pdf or eps
> figure, LyX displays an error in converting the file; accordingly I can't see
> the figure in the software.
> The output PDF i
I installed LyX 2.1.4. on a Mac with El Capitan. When I insert a pdf or eps
figure, LyX displays an error in converting the file; accordingly I can't see
the figure in the software.
The output PDF is created without any problem.
I was able to start LyX using the command line and this i
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 07:12:38AM -0700, James Sutherland wrote:
> I can confirm this problem.
> My suggestion is to type out the latex form for characters rather than
> using the palettes. This is faster, but does require that you know the
> latex form.
> James
James and Pierre,
The bug you tw
I can confirm this problem.
My suggestion is to type out the latex form for characters rather than
using the palettes. This is faster, but does require that you know the
latex form.
James
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Pierre Bessière
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just updated Lyx to 2.1.4 on a Po
Hi all,
I just updated Lyx to 2.1.4 on a Powerbook Pro with OS X (10.11.1).
There is a very interesting, strange and bothersome phenomena : the math
palettes are „transparent“ for the mouse.
If you click on a math palette with a background that is not the Lyx window, it
works.
On the contrary if
ly_
5. reinstall LyX using the latest bundle installer:
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/2.1.4/LyX-2.1.4-Bundle-4.exe
This should do the job.
Please report if this helped you.
thank and regards
Uwe
I believe that " MiKTeX you got" should read " MiKTeX you will get".
Michael is suggesting installing the complete MiKTeX. It takes up a lot of
space but can be awfully useful when you need some obscure package to tweak
that last formatting problem. Otherwise you waste a lot of time loading
indiv
On 10/28/2015 05:33 AM, Michael Berger wrote:
You got errors in the first place because some packages were still
missing. By installing the complete content of MiKTeX you got every
single packag needed or not.
Michael
No, I never installed the complete content of MikTeX, I only had it
download
On 10/28/2015 09:44 AM, PhilipPirrip wrote:
On 10/28/2015 03:28 AM, QIN Peng wrote:
I have installed MikTex 2.9 through ProTex before. Then I installed Lyx
2.1.4 bundle version and during the installing process, it reminded me
to update MikTex's package, and I updated it with MikTeX Pa
On 10/28/2015 03:28 AM, QIN Peng wrote:
I have installed MikTex 2.9 through ProTex before. Then I installed Lyx
2.1.4 bundle version and during the installing process, it reminded me
to update MikTex's package, and I updated it with MikTeX Package Manager
through the internet.
I don
Hello,
It is my first time to use Lyx and LaTex.
I have installed MikTex 2.9 through ProTex before. Then I installed Lyx
2.1.4 bundle version and during the installing process, it reminded me to
update MikTex's package, and I updated it with MikTeX Package Manager
through the internet.
W
Dear LyXers,
it was not possible to spell-check English (US and Canadian) under LyX
2.1.4 for Windows. This problem is now fixed.
There are 2 possibilities:
- replace the 2 files
en_CA.aff
en_US.aff
in the LyX installation folder with these ones:
http://sourceforge.net/projects
The Lyx Team,
Have upgraded from 2.1.3 to 2.1.4 on MX14 Linux. Had an initial problem
with a graphic being misplaced but this error disappeared after a reboot.
All is now behaving.
Many thanks for the work put into 2.1.4
Gordon
Tauranga N.Z.
Windows binaries for LyX 2.1.4 are now available for download.
Public release of LyX version 2.1.4
===
We are proud to announce the release of LyX 2.1.4. This is the fourth
maintenance release in the 2.1.x series.
Please note that, at this time, there are
Public release of LyX version 2.1.4
===
We are proud to announce the release of LyX 2.1.4. This is the fourth
maintenance release in the 2.1.x series.
Please note that, at this time, there are no binaries for Windows. These
will be released when some issues with
62 matches
Mail list logo