Andrew Parsloe wrote:
> >Is someone else around running lyx on Qt>5.7 on different OS than on suse?
> >What are current windows versions use?
> >
> >Pavel
> My 2.3.0 (not quite Riki's final version) uses Qt 5.10.1. Integrals
> display correctly.
That's good news, meaning it might be something spec
On 30/08/2018 4:00 a.m., Pavel Sanda wrote:
M.B. Schiekel wrote:
I agree with your bet, Pavel :-)
In my last email with my suggested workaraound I wrote:
I compiled LyX-2.3.0 on an openSUSE-Leap-15.0 system with QT-4.8.7
. And hey, all integrals are displayed right :-) So this
integral-display-
M.B. Schiekel wrote:
> I agree with your bet, Pavel :-)
> In my last email with my suggested workaraound I wrote:
> > I compiled LyX-2.3.0 on an openSUSE-Leap-15.0 system with QT-4.8.7
> > . And hey, all integrals are displayed right :-) So this
> > integral-display-bug will be most likely in the L
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 29.08.2018 um 14:00 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> [bernhard]:
> 1. now I managed to compile LyX-2.3.0 and LyX-2.2.4 on an
> older openSUSE-Leap-42.3 system with KDE-Plasma-5.8.7 with
> Qt-5.6.2 and TeXLive 2016. Result: /int, /iint, /iiint,
M.B. Schiekel wrote:
> >>> 1. now I managed to compile LyX-2.3.0 and LyX-2.2.4 on an
> >>> older openSUSE-Leap-42.3 system with KDE-Plasma-5.8.7 with
> >>> Qt-5.6.2 and TeXLive 2016. Result: /int, /iint, /iiint,
> >>> /nt, /ioint - all are displayed correctly by LyX.
> >>>
> >>> 2. And as befo
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 03:26:32PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 08:37:18PM +0200, M.B. Schiekel wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Am 22.08.2018 um 18:23 schrieb M.B. Schiekel:
> > > [bernhard] 1. now I managed to compile LyX-2.3.0 and L
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 08:37:18PM +0200, M.B. Schiekel wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am 22.08.2018 um 18:23 schrieb M.B. Schiekel:
> > [bernhard] 1. now I managed to compile LyX-2.3.0 and LyX-2.2.4 on
> > an older openSUSE-Leap-42.3 system with KDE-Plasma-5.8.7 with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 22.08.2018 um 18:23 schrieb M.B. Schiekel:
> [bernhard] 1. now I managed to compile LyX-2.3.0 and LyX-2.2.4 on
> an older openSUSE-Leap-42.3 system with KDE-Plasma-5.8.7 with
> Qt-5.6.2 and TeXLive 2016. Result: /int, /iint, /iiint, /nt,
> /ioin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 25.08.2018 um 17:21 schrieb Ricardo Berlasso:
> ... I also have problems with int display in 2.3.0 (openSUSE 15.1).
> When looking at LyX's fonts I can see what's shown in the
> attachment.
>
> Regards, Ricardo
Hi Ricardo,
welcome in our group o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 25.08.2018 um 17:09 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> ... 'Times New Roman' is not 'Latin Modern Roman' ...
Hi Kornel,
right :-)
Changing from 'Times New Roman' to 'Latin Modern Roman' resulted in no
change, so I restored my original 'Times New Roman'.
But
Am Samstag, 25. August 2018 16:41:20 CEST schrieb M.B. Schiekel
:
> GuiFontLoader.cpp (356): Font 'Roman, Medium, Upright, Normal, none, Emphasis
> Off, Underline Off, Strike out Off, Cross out Off, Double underline Off, Wavy
> underline Off, Noun Off, ' matched by
> Times New Roman
>
'Times N
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> ... You could look at the output from:
>
> lyx -dbg font
>
> Maybe it provides clues.
Hi Scott,
thank you for your kind reply. I added the output of
lyx -dbg font .
Might be you see more in this output than me ?
Cheers,
bernhard
- --
Homep
On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 11:43:37AM +0200, M.B. Schiekel wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am 23.08.2018 um 18:13 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> > ... That is a problem. The preferences there apply only to
> > text-fonts. We don't have yet preferences for math font in
> > lyx-di
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 23.08.2018 um 18:13 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> ... That is a problem. The preferences there apply only to
> text-fonts. We don't have yet preferences for math font in
> lyx-display. Could be made a feature request though. OTOH, some
> fonts have own ma
Am Donnerstag, 23. August 2018 17:50:30 CEST schrieb M.B. Schiekel
:
> Am 23.08.2018 um 08:36 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> > Am Mittwoch, 22. August 2018 21:07:38 CEST schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> > :
> >> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 06:23:48PM +0200, M.B. Schiekel wrote:
> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 23.08.2018 um 08:36 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> Am Mittwoch, 22. August 2018 21:07:38 CEST schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> :
>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 06:23:48PM +0200, M.B. Schiekel wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Am 18.08.
Am Mittwoch, 22. August 2018 21:07:38 CEST schrieb Scott Kostyshak
:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 06:23:48PM +0200, M.B. Schiekel wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Am 18.08.2018 um 23:48 schrieb M.B. Schiekel:
> > > ... Now I downloaded the sources of lyx-2.3.0 and
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 06:23:48PM +0200, M.B. Schiekel wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am 18.08.2018 um 23:48 schrieb M.B. Schiekel:
> > ... Now I downloaded the sources of lyx-2.3.0 and lyx-2.2.4 and
> > compiled. ... Result: I got this \int display-error in 2.3.0 an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 18.08.2018 um 23:48 schrieb M.B. Schiekel:
> ... Now I downloaded the sources of lyx-2.3.0 and lyx-2.2.4 and
> compiled. ... Result: I got this \int display-error in 2.3.0 and
> also in 2.2.4. This seems to indicate for me, that the change of
> KDE-
On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 11:48:53PM +0200, M.B. Schiekel wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> > ... Are you able to compile LyX? If so, you could see if the bug is
> > still there in 2.3.1dev and in master. Also, if it is still there,
> > you could do a bisect to find out wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> ... Are you able to compile LyX? If so, you could see if the bug is
> still there in 2.3.1dev and in master. Also, if it is still there,
> you could do a bisect to find out which commit caused it. Since I
> can't reproduce on 2.3.x or current master,
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 08:53:33PM +0200, M.B. Schiekel wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am 17.08.2018 um 17:23 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > ...If you are feeling inspired, it would be helpful if you could go
> > back through your old bugs that are not marked as fixed (
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 17.08.2018 um 17:23 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> ...If you are feeling inspired, it would be helpful if you could go
> back through your old bugs that are not marked as fixed (let me
> know if you need help finding these) and say whether you can still
Hi Bernhard,
Thanks for your nice email. Comments are in-line below.
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 01:37:42PM +0200, M.B. Schiekel wrote:
> The last time I read and wrote on lyx-users was in 2012, and now and
> then I got a message of a resolved minor bug from our hardworking
> developers. Again thank
Hi everybody,
first of all want to thank the LyX-community for our wonderful
LyX-program! I'm doing my mathematical physics with LyX since the 1.0
versions :-)
The last time I read and wrote on lyx-users was in 2012, and now and
then I got a message of a resolved minor bug from our hardworking
d
25 matches
Mail list logo