Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 10:05:13AM +0200, Roy Dragseth wrote:
> [...]
> > Of course, I still miss many of the nifty emacs features, marking
> > blocks of text in one keystroke, transposing chars, words, lines, but
> > all in all I'm more pr
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 02:29:59PM +0100, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
>
> > So, kudos to the LyX team!
>
> Taken on behalf of the LyX team. (Since today is friday no smile.)
Replying to myself: Wrong list, I can smile again. :-) ;-)
--
José
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 10:05:13AM +0200, Roy Dragseth wrote:
[...]
> Of course, I still miss many of the nifty emacs features, marking
> blocks of text in one keystroke, transposing chars, words, lines, but
> all in all I'm more productive using lyx than typing LaTeX directly.
Can't you mark b
"Piotr R. Sidorowicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Out of curiosity, if you're going to go through the trouble of learning
> LaTeX, why bother using LyX? ;)
>
I see the smiley, but can't resist.
Here is my 10cents, or øre as we would say in Norway.
I turned to LyX after writing LaTeX direc
On 7 Sep 2001, at 10:25, Piotr R. Sidorowicz wrote:
> Out of curiosity, if you're going to go through the trouble of
> learning LaTeX, why bother using LyX? ;)
Because LyX is better (at least for me). I am able to write in
LaTeX (and occassionally do so, when not on Linux), but when I
really w
On Friday 07 September 2001 10:25, Piotr R. Sidorowicz wrote:
>
> Out of curiosity, if you're going to go through the trouble of learning
> LaTeX, why bother using LyX? ;)
> Piotr
An excellent question! My top priority as a writer is to use an absolutely
no-brainer tool. Even with a no-brainer
Piotr R. Sidorowicz writes:
Out of curiosity, if you're going to go through the trouble of learning
LaTeX, why bother using LyX? ;)
I used to write with LaTeX, using xemacs/auc-tex, and switched to LyX
for two reasons:
1) because the LyX interface is less off-putting to others who we
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Steve Litt wrote:
> >
> > Would you recommend Lamport's book to someone who is writing a book in Lyx
> > and needs lots of custom Environments and character styles? Is it
> > understandable for someone who, let'
nder "programming
> > languages".
> Would you recommend Lamport's book to someone who is writing a book in Lyx
> and needs lots of custom Environments and character styles? Is it
> understandable for someone who, let's put it this way -- doesn't have the
&g
Steve Litt wrote:
>
> Would you recommend Lamport's book to someone who is writing a book in Lyx
> and needs lots of custom Environments and character styles? Is it
> understandable for someone who, let's put it this way -- doesn't have the
> world's best atten
On Thursday 06 September 2001 18:51, Kathryn Andersen wrote:
>
> LyX wasn't actually free -- it cost me $72 (the price of Lamport's LaTeX
> book). Oddly enough, I found the book catalogued under "programming
> languages".
>
> Kathryn Andersen
Kathryn,
11 matches
Mail list logo
