On 26.02.08, rgheck wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Quoting rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You don't have "Use Paragraph's Default Alignment"? The point of this
> option is to undo customization. That's why I added it. ;-)
So it works similar to
* the [default] option in the line-sp
Quoting rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
From my view I was trying to format a footnote and get rid of an
extra blank line in the footnote footer region. So it didn't
occur to me that "justified" would apply to that. But maybe it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
From my view I was trying to format a footnote and get rid of an
extra blank line in the footnote footer region. So it didn't occur
to me that "justified" would apply to that. But maybe it does.
(paragraph formatting is otherwise
Quoting rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
From my view I was trying to format a footnote and get rid of an
extra blank line in the footnote footer region. So it didn't occur
to me that "justified" would apply to that. But maybe it does.
(paragraph formatting is otherwise defined in the class?)
My take is that if "justified" wasn't there I probably would have
tried it. But if it actually removes paragraph formatting (even if
it resorts to the default for the context) wouldn't it be clearer
to say "Remove Paragraph Formatting"? I'm surmising it's doing
both. So I understand th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
You don't have "Use Paragraph's Default Alignment"? The point of this
option is to undo customization. That's why I added it. ;-)
Ah! I didn't try it before because it says "[justified]" But this
indeed fixes the formatting of t
Quoting rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
You don't have "Use Paragraph's Default Alignment"? The point of this
option is to undo customization. That's why I added it. ;-)
Ah! I didn't try it before because it says "[justified]" But t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
You don't have "Use Paragraph's Default Alignment"? The point of this
option is to undo customization. That's why I added it. ;-)
Ah! I didn't try it before because it says "[justified]" But this
indeed fixes the formatting of t
Quoting rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
You don't have "Use Paragraph's Default Alignment"? The point of this
option is to undo customization. That's why I added it. ;-)
Ah! I didn't try it before because it says "[justified]" But this
indeed fixes the formatting of the pasted footnote conten
You don't have "Use Paragraph's Default Alignment"? The point of this
option is to undo customization. That's why I added it. ;-)
Ah! I didn't try it before because it says "[justified]" But this
indeed fixes the formatting of the pasted footnote content. Thanks!
Hmm. We had a really, reall
Quoting rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
1) creating a footnote from existing text causing unusable formatting.
I'm not following your description of this problem. Is the problem that
when you copy and paste, LyX is copying the paragraph formatting? -- If
so, you can edit the formatting by selecti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Feb 24, 2008, at 9:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In summary, I'm mentioning a few problems here:
Main one is:
1) creating a footnote from existing text causing unusable formatting.
I'm not following your description of
On Feb 25, 2008, at 12:00 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
3) Getting view source to view the paragraph in which the
cursor resides as the User Guide says it will.
It seems like this problem arises when the "Automatic update"
option is
unchecked; this indeed seems to be a bug. The workaround is to
Quoting Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Feb 24, 2008, at 9:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
In summary, I'm mentioning a few problems here:
Main one is:
1) creating a footnote from existing text causing unusable formatting.
I'm not following your description of this problem. Is th
On Feb 24, 2008, at 9:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
In summary, I'm mentioning a few problems here:
Main one is:
1) creating a footnote from existing text causing unusable formatting.
I'm not following your description of this problem. Is the problem
that when you copy and paste, Ly
Hi, I'm converting some documents into LyX. As a side-note, I can't
get .rtf import to work but can seem to import latex files. It would
be easier if I could import .rtf files.
Anyway, the problem is that once imported, I need to re-configure the
footnotes. When I create a footnote and co
K. Elo wrote:
This is exactly what Charles suggested - and this works, no doubt!
But because I did NOT know LyX being smart enough to interpret a
footnote directly after a title as \thanks, I just had to figure
out a solution of my own (why on earth would I have posted my
question if I had known
Hi,
Herbert Voss, 11.12.2005 22:58:
> K. Elo wrote:
> > This is exactly what Charles suggested - and this works, no doubt!
> > But because I did NOT know LyX being smart enough to interpret a
> > footnote directly after a title as \thanks, I just had to figure
> > out a solution of my own (why on
K. Elo wrote:
This is exactly what Charles suggested - and this works, no doubt! But
because I did NOT know LyX being smart enough to interpret a footnote
directly after a title as \thanks, I just had to figure out a solution
of my own (why on earth would I have posted my question if I had kno
Hi Herbert,
Herbert Voss, 11.12.2005 22:08:
> > Another thing are urls within a \thanks. I tried to include my
> > email as a url, but all I've got were a bundle of Latex errors.
> > After examining my thick and quite expensive ;-) TLC2e, I figured
> > out the trick:
> >
> > Preamble:
> > \usepack
K. Elo wrote:
Hi,
Charles de Miramon, 10.12.2005 17:35:
K. Elo wrote:
Hi,
Axel Dessecker, 9.12.2005 19:50:
Kimmo,
Am Freitag, 09. Dezember 2005 15:27 schrieb K. Elo:
1) The title should be followed by a footnote marked with *,
i.e. bla bla bla*
2) All other footnotes should be marked w
Hi,
Charles de Miramon, 10.12.2005 17:35:
> K. Elo wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Axel Dessecker, 9.12.2005 19:50:
> >> Kimmo,
> >>
> >> Am Freitag, 09. Dezember 2005 15:27 schrieb K. Elo:
> >> > 1) The title should be followed by a footnote marked with *,
> >> > i.e. bla bla bla*
> >> > 2) All other foot
K. Elo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Axel Dessecker, 9.12.2005 19:50:
>> Kimmo,
>>
>> Am Freitag, 09. Dezember 2005 15:27 schrieb K. Elo:
>> > 1) The title should be followed by a footnote marked with *, i.e.
>> > bla bla bla*
>> > 2) All other footnotes should be marked with numbers (1,2,...).
>> > Actually,
Hi,
Axel Dessecker, 9.12.2005 19:50:
> Kimmo,
>
> Am Freitag, 09. Dezember 2005 15:27 schrieb K. Elo:
> > 1) The title should be followed by a footnote marked with *, i.e.
> > bla bla bla*
> > 2) All other footnotes should be marked with numbers (1,2,...).
> > Actually, the idea is the same as in
Kimmo,
Am Freitag, 09. Dezember 2005 15:27 schrieb K. Elo:
> 1) The title should be followed by a footnote marked with *, i.e. bla
> bla bla*
> 2) All other footnotes should be marked with numbers (1,2,...).
> Actually, the idea is the same as in TLC2e, p. 115.
What about something like
\thanks{
Hi @ all,
I am desperately trying to get the following layout for an article
straight.
1) The title should be followed by a footnote marked with *, i.e. bla
bla bla*
2) All other footnotes should be marked with numbers (1,2,...).
Actually, the idea is the same as in TLC2e, p. 115.
Unfortunate
On 30-Jul-2001 Jacek M. Holeczek wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a file written with 1.1.5fix2 which contains some long-tables. Many
> of rows contain "footnotes". I used ctrl-enter to place "linebreaks", so
> that the table fits to the screen (in lyx window), but new lyx (1.1.6fix3)
> ignores them. All ce
Hi,
I have a file written with 1.1.5fix2 which contains some long-tables. Many
of rows contain "footnotes". I used ctrl-enter to place "linebreaks", so
that the table fits to the screen (in lyx window), but new lyx (1.1.6fix3)
ignores them. All cells are made "one-row". Then the table does not fit
28 matches
Mail list logo
