On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Angus Leeming wrote:
AL> Conclusion: if you like xforms better, then stick with it.
Goodie.
Both QT and GTK+ are counter-productive and ugly for me. (But then I think
both GNOME and KDE are that as well... :-])
/Henrik (xforms, WindowMaker, Slackware, ...)
Henrik Edlund wrote:
> I was just looking at http://www.devel.lyx.org/guii.php3 and it
> seems there that the xforms interface is more complete. I am
> pondering whether I should move from xforms to QT or not. I like
> xforms better, but if QT is getting more settings/options/etc then I
> should
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Angus Leeming wrote:
AL> default in what sense? IMO, the only difference between the two
AL> frontends in that
AL> $ ./configure
AL> will build the xforms frontend. In all other respects, they are /
AL> should be equal.
That is what I mean by default.
AL> Incidentally, in 1.4
Henrik Edlund wrote:
> Will QT become the default GUI in 1.4? Or does xforms still support
> more options/configurability so it will remain default?
default in what sense? IMO, the only difference between the two
frontends in that
$ ./configure
will build the xforms frontend. In all
Will QT become the default GUI in 1.4? Or does xforms still support more
options/configurability so it will remain default?
