[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, lamikr wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks, I did not know these hard spaces and hard lines before. But
>>> actually I think I was searching something opposite, like "soft lines"
>>> which would be visible in the
> "lamikr" == lamikr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
lamikr> Thanks, I did not know these hard spaces and hard lines
lamikr> before. But actually I think I was searching something
lamikr> opposite, like "soft lines" which would be visible in the
lamikr> editor but not anymore in the final text. B
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, lamikr wrote:
Thanks, I did not know these hard spaces and hard lines before. But
actually I think I was searching something opposite, like "soft lines"
which would be visible in the editor but not anymore in the final text.
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, lamikr wrote:
Thanks, I did not know these hard spaces and hard lines before. But
actually I think I was searching something opposite, like "soft lines"
which would be visible in the editor but not anymore in the final text.
Buf this was just an idea I got to my mind while
> As noted elsewhere, this violates the "what you see is what you meant"
> philosophy underlying LyX. That said, to string out multiple spaces
> in a row, you can just enter hard spaces (C-space); to enter a bunch
> of blank lines (that won't collapse), use C-enter.
Thanks, I did not know these h
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 07:19:20PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> lamikr wrote:
>
> >And as I see the Lyx editor anyway as a smart code editor for Latex, I
> >would not think it being against the WYSIWYM principles Lyx try to
> >follow if it would allow writers to set some more "air" to their
