Re: About DocBook conversion

2002-04-03 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Wednesday 03 April 2002 18:18, Yannick Patois wrote: > Hi, Hi, > I checked your fix and it does work well, thanks again. Good. :-) > But I disnt already saw it in the CVS, am I right that you didnt commited > it yet ? I have a live besides LyX, do you know? ;-) Ok, commited. :-) Tom

Re: About DocBook conversion

2002-04-03 Thread Yannick Patois
Hi, I checked your fix and it does work well, thanks again. But I disnt already saw it in the CVS, am I right that you didnt commited it yet ? Yannick

Re: About DocBook conversion

2002-04-03 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 02 April 2002 22:02, Yannick Patois wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for your fast reply. :-) > I think I got something from it. But does it also apply to and some > other tags ? Ok, once more you are right, since they cann't be inside a table, I will output the correct newline for thos

Re: About DocBook conversion

2002-04-02 Thread Yannick Patois
Hi, Thanks for your fast reply. On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: > > - There are not enough newline (\n) in the generated sgml, that makes it > > hard to read when needed (no new line after a or even a ). > The problem is know as the "pernicious mixed content" since entry

Re: About DocBook conversion

2002-04-02 Thread Yannick Patois
Hi, On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: > I send the fix attached if you want to try it. Thanks for the fix, I'll test it tomorow. I wasnt very far in my own tries btw ;) Yannick

Re: About DocBook conversion

2002-04-02 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
Hi, I send the fix attached if you want to try it. -- José Abílio Index: src/insets/insetfoot.C === RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/insets/insetfoot.C,v retrieving revision 1.45 diff -u -p -r1.45 insetfoot.C

Re: About DocBook conversion

2002-04-02 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 02 April 2002 18:27, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: > > > - Footnotes are not acknowledged correctly (no 'footnote' in the output > > code). > > This should be easy to fix. Thanks for the report. Ok, as I thought, very easy to change. I have the fix in my tree I will commit it

Re: About DocBook conversion

2002-04-02 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 02 April 2002 14:17, Yannick Patois wrote: > Hi, Hi Yannick, > (latest CVS devel version) > > A few remarks about docbook mode: > > - There are not enough newline (\n) in the generated sgml, that makes it > hard to read when needed (no new line after a or even a ). This is on pu

About DocBook conversion

2002-04-02 Thread Yannick Patois
Hi, (latest CVS devel version) A few remarks about docbook mode: - There are not enough newline (\n) in the generated sgml, that makes it hard to read when needed (no new line after a or even a ). - Footnotes are not acknowledged correctly (no 'footnote' in the output code). Unfortunately, I