On 2014-04-01, Wolfgang Keller wrote:
> Probably the only thing that's still left from the original LyTeX (must
> have been 1.6.x back then) is the folder structure and the startupt
> script.
Hey, if you have a fairly uncommon setup, dont expect everything to work out
of the box!
...
> So if an
> Thanks, I was not aware of that LyTeX is still alive.
> Apparently this version writes something to the registry (this can
> also be done by portable versions). However, I wonder that they
> provided a beta version as portable LyTeX
They don't, at least not for me.
I installed the version they
Am 30.03.2014 16:54, schrieb Steve Litt:
On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 19:07:35 -0400
Richard Heck wrote:
On 03/29/2014 04:58 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Wolfgang Keller
wrote:
Looks like someone wanted to be extra-smart, but this only prevents
people from being able t
On Sun, 30 Mar 2014 18:08:24 -0300
John Coppens wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 20:22:41 +0100
> Wolfgang Keller wrote:
>
> > Looks like someone wanted to be extra-smart, but this only prevents
> > people from being able to do what they need to do. Which, to me, is
> > compulsive, imperious and to
On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 20:22:41 +0100
Wolfgang Keller wrote:
> Looks like someone wanted to be extra-smart, but this only prevents
> people from being able to do what they need to do. Which, to me, is
> compulsive, imperious and totally braindead, if you prefer these
> adjectives to "bullshittish".
On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 19:07:35 -0400
Richard Heck wrote:
> On 03/29/2014 04:58 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Wolfgang Keller
> > wrote:
> >> Looks like someone wanted to be extra-smart, but this only prevents
> >> people from being able to do what they need to do.
Richard Heck skrev 2014-03-30 00:07:
On 03/29/2014 04:58 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Wolfgang Keller
wrote:
Looks like someone wanted to be extra-smart, but this only prevents
people from being able to do what they need to do. Which, to me, is
compulsive, imperio
Am 26.03.2014 22:41, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Public release of LyX version 2.1.0rc1
LyX 2.1.0rc1 is the culmination of three years of hard work.
This release is meant for testing before we actually release LyX 2.1.
Dear LyX testers,
please note that if you are on Windows _and_ have a
Am 29.03.2014 20:22, schrieb Wolfgang Keller:
Can you give me more information please. What LyX version are you
using?
LyX Version 2.1.0beta2
(Sonntag, 10. November 2013)
Ah, then it is clear. The beta releases were test builds to test LyX's new features. Its installer
was not updated for a
On 03/29/2014 04:58 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Wolfgang Keller wrote:
Looks like someone wanted to be extra-smart, but this only prevents
people from being able to do what they need to do. Which, to me, is
compulsive, imperious and totally braindead, if you prefe
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Wolfgang Keller wrote:
>> > LyX is already installed.
>> > Please uninstall LyX first.
>> >
>> > WTF?!
>> >
>> > First, this error message is *wrong*, since I don't have LyX
>> > "installed". I use it in portable mode.
>>
>> Can you give me more information please.
> > LyX is already installed.
> > Please uninstall LyX first.
> >
> > WTF?!
> >
> > First, this error message is *wrong*, since I don't have LyX
> > "installed". I use it in portable mode.
>
> Can you give me more information please. What LyX version are you
> using?
LyX Version 2.1.0beta2
(Sonnt
Am 28.03.2014 20:40, schrieb Wolfgang Keller:
LyX is already installed.
Please uninstall LyX first.
WTF?!
First, this error message is *wrong*, since I don't have LyX
"installed". I use it in portable mode.
Can you give me more information please. What LyX version are you using? From where d
> You can download LyX 2.1.0rc1 from ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/.
>
> We hope you will enjoy the result!
LyX is already installed.
Please uninstall LyX first.
WTF?!
First, this error message is *wrong*, since I don't have LyX
"installed". I use it in portable mode.
Second, what's that bul
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 7:34 AM, William Seager wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 26, 2014 22:41:50 Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>> We are proud to announce the first release candidate of the new
>> LyX 2.1 series.
>
> great news - but I've been bitten before by incompatibility
> of formats between ve
On Wednesday, March 26, 2014 22:41:50 Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> We are proud to announce the first release candidate of the new
> LyX 2.1 series.
great news - but I've been bitten before by incompatibility
of formats between versions. Does 2.1rc1 permit export
to old lyx versions?
thanks,
Hi guys,
first of all thanks for your efforts, it does look great! However I am
still frustrated in using it on my device with a high resolution screen
(Windows), as the icons are too small (the problem that I highlighted here:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/81497
but was
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Public release of LyX version 2.1.0rc1
>
>
Ubuntu packages are now available from the PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/daily/+packages
Liviu
> We are proud to announce the f
Public release of LyX version 2.1.0rc1
We are proud to announce the first release candidate of the new
LyX 2.1 series.
With this release, LyX celebrates 18 years of existence. The 2.1 series
has a rich set of new features compared to the current stable se
19 matches
Mail list logo
